Preview

Rene Descartes Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
938 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rene Descartes Research Paper
Socrates is known as the father of Western Philosophy and Descartes is known as the father of Modern Philosophy. Both are key members in shaping the world today. Socrates taught us to question everything and about critical thinking. Descartes taught us that humans are thinkers and that true knowledge is acquired through reason. Their lessons have inspired many different people who have made a foot print in history. Even today, one can see their influence guiding our information. Socrates has taught the world a great deal of things. Even today, more than two thousand years later, people study his life and books for a glimpse of his wisdom. Among his many lessons, Socrates taught us about questioning everything. This was known as the Socratic …show more content…

He wanted to restructure the branches of knowledge (literature, Oratory and Poetry, Mathematics, Theology, Philosophy, and Sciences) so that only knowledge that is absolutely certain can be used. In his search for true knowledge, Descartes used the method of doubt to separate the the knowledge that was without a doubt true from those who still needed certainty. Descartes rejected anything that could not be proven. He refused to accept knowledge through senses because they can deceive. for example, when some one is dreaming, their senses deceive them by making them think that the dream is real. Their senses made the person think that the dream was reality. He also refuses hasty judgment and prejudice because they are not facts. Furthermore, Descartes refuses perceptual knowledge because that too is unreliable. For example, as some one walks down a street and has a feeling that they are being followed, does not mean that the person is actually being followed. Although one might think that because Descartes believes only on what is proven, he would not believe in God, he is in fact a believer of God. He was able to prove that God exists through deductive proof. He stated that the idea of God itself is proof of God's existence. The idea of perfection had to have an origin, which is God the only perfect being; therefore God is real. The proving of God being real whether one believes him or not is not important, but the fact that he did as a human being is important. This meant that humans can prove anything if applying the correct methods. It identified humans as thinkers who used reason to determine the truth. Because of Descartes' philosophy, the branches of knowledge that we learn today are accurate. Humans determine what is true through reason and not through faith, senses, and perceptions. Mankind's knowledge goes only where truth is certain, eliminating doubt. All the branches

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates is considered the “first philosopher,” although there were many before him. Plato was actually taught by Socrates, and Aristotle was taught by Plato. So Socrates’ teaching more or less helped develop the greatest thinkers to live, along with making personal contributions to philosophy. He is the founder of Western Philosophy, and his other personal contributions include the development of socratic irony and the socratic method. Most importantly he is respected for developing the practice of a philosophical version of pedagogy, which is where the teacher asks the students questions that will provoke the best answer and force the student to provide basic personal insight.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his first meditation, Descartes embarks on a journey to ensure that all his beliefs are true. He deems that he must rid himself of all false knowledge in order to obtain any true knowledge. Descartes decides to doubt everything he has previously held to be true. He will rely on his reasoning ability to rebuild his own knowledge, beginning with things of which he is completely certain. He states, “But reason now persuades me that I should withhold my assent no less carefully from opinions that are not completely certain and indubitable than I would from those that are patently false,” (18). Descartes refuses to accept anything that is possible to doubt. His reason for doing so is because he truly believes that this is the only way to discover the possible existence of something that cannot be doubted.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates A Tyrant

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates, the philosopher credited with forming the very bedrock of Western thought; whose very name is synonymous with the classical period in Greek philosophy surprisingly never actually wrote a single word. His works continue to live on in his teachings alone. He founded no school, taught in no classroom and accepted no fee, however his pursuit of truth, his intellectual methods and most importantly his incessant questions have survived the ages in the minds, and on the lips of his students. In fact, it was this very pursuit of truth through incessant questioning—the Socratic dialectic—which led to his rise as a teacher and wise man amongst Athenian society, and ultimately to his demise.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clear your mind, if you will, of everything you have ever seen or known to be true. To begin understanding Rene Descartes' method of doubt, you need to suspend all prejudice and prior judgments and start with a clean slate "for the purpose of discovering some ultimate truth on which to base all thought." (Kolak, Pg.225). Discouraged with much skepticism from his own beliefs, Descartes was embarrassed of his own ignorance. He set out to try and accomplish the task of finding an absolute truth in which he would base his beliefs. Placing upon himself a task to find an axiom or absolute truth to base all thought, "he ventured as a youth in travel to collect a variety in experiences to derive some profit in which he would be benefited." (Kolak, Pg.225). When analyzing the method of doubt "you must take complex conceptions into their constituents until the irreducible elements are simple, clear, and distinct ideas, and show that all such basic ideas can be derived from, or can depend upon, the primary consciousness of a being that it thinks." (Durant, Pg.639).…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He comes to the conclusion that there is only one thing we are sure of – the cogito (I think, therefore I am). Descartes claims the one thing we can be sure of is our existence. The mind, the soul, and one’s rational thinking capacity are the only things we can prove to exist. As long as a person doubts, questions, and thinks of the world around him, he is sure of is his existence (Meditation Two, 65). If the idea of a deceiver god was true, there must be someone the deceiver god is deceiving, which again, confirms our existence. Descartes chooses to make the knowledge of our existence, the cogito, a foundation of knowledge, as it is the only thing he is completely sure of. Descartes is not able to prove the existence of our bodies, of the external world, or even god. What he does prove is the existence of our ability to think…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Descartes

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rene Descartes didn't ask other people the questions he wanted the answers too. He asked himself. Descartes only wanted the truth so he had to forget everything he ever learned and start all over asking himself the questions that Socrates would ask of other people. Although Descartes wanted to know everything that was true, the way he figured these things out are still being questioned today. "I think, therefore I am" is that start that Rene Descartes needed to start proving everything he wanted to be true. Descartes was influenced by the precision and completeness of mathematics. Euclid, was the man that influenced him the most, because of his axioms and the thought that you must start all with things that you know…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    His principal aim of the book was to provide a foundation for scientific knowledge based on the mind and not on the senses. He also wanted to show how science and religion can be compatible by separating the body and mind. To discover a firm foundation of absolute certainty on which he can build his new system of knowledge, Descartes chose to use a method called “radical doubt,” trough which he would doubt everything that could possibly be doubted, until he can discover any suggestion that is logically undeniable. If such a thing is proofed to exist, it would be the base of all…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes as a philosopher, questions everything around him. He even questions whether or not he truly exists as a person. He believes he does exists as a thinking thing, so he decides he needs to figure out if it is possible to find more self-evident truths, to prove his theory. Descartes tries to develop a system for certain knowledge, but within his innovative plan he finds a flaw. The clear and distinct thoughts are only undoubted, so as long as Descartes attends to them they seem reliable, but as soon as they fall out of awareness, the doubt creeps back in. (page 26) He then begins to question that it may have been an evil demon that caused him to believe the certainty of his truths (page 29), Decartes system of knowledge doesn’t seem too reliable at…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes overall project is to find a definite certainty on which he can base all his knowledge and beliefs. A foundation that he will be able to prove without a doubt. To find a definite certainty he uses a methodical doubt, this states that anything that could be doubted must be taken as false. This is done to find an absolute certainty for which to base all knowledge. Descartes develops his Evil Genius theory to bring doubt to all senses and hence making them false. The theory says that it is possible that there is someone (an evil genius) who is controlling our mind. If so we wouldn't be sure whether or not what we see was real or just a dream, therefore all of our senses would be doubtable and thus taken as false. This theory proves that nothing external is certain and must be proven false to continue his quest for truth and certainty.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes has been known as the father of Western philosophy. This with his skeptic approach has profoundly changed the course of philosophy. Also…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smith, Kurt, comp. "Descartes ' Life and Works." Stanford Ecyclopedia of Philosophy. 9 Apr. 2001. Web. 2 Oct. 2009. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes-works/#Med.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Descartes

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates and Descartes have profoundly changed the philosophical thought of occident. Being both great thinkers, it is essay to portray their differences and similitudes base on how well they always exposed them. Descartes documented all his work; however, there is not any document written by Socrates himself, but by his student, for instance, Plato. Socrates was born 469 BC. He bounced between two branches of philosophy, ethics and epistemology.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    philosophy to which he was to devote the rest of his life. He made a pilgrimage…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Socrates’ relative contributions are not completely devoid of text; rather, since his offerings were more indirectly related to the modern definition of science, it prompts the switching of mindset from the scientific perspective to that of a historical one, in order to gain a true understanding of just how critical a figure he was to the field of natural philosophy. Socrates would, in using what little we do know about him as evidence, still be considered more of a philosopher than a scientist even today, as his impact throughout the fields of ethics, elenchus4 (or, Socratic Method) - a style of education he created and, consequently, in the field of epistemology cannot be understated. Socrates was born in Athens during the year 469 BCE, an era…

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Politics Assignment

    • 2622 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Socrates felt today in the use of the scientific method, in which hypothesis is the first stage. The development and practice of this method is one of Socrates' most enduring contributions, and is a key factor in earning his mantle as the father of political philosophy, ethics or moral philosophy, and as a figurehead of all the central themes in Western philosophy. Socrates most important contribution to Western thought is his dialectic method of inquiry, known as the Socratic Method of which he largely applied to the examination of key moral concepts such as the Good and Justice. It was first described by Plato in the Socratic Dialogues. To solve a problem, it would be broken down into a series of questions, the answers to which gradually distill the answer a person would seek. The influence of this approach is most strongly…

    • 2622 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays