It’s also evident from George Franklin’s murder case, that something always induces or spark the recovery process. I consider it to be kind of repressed memory stimulant. Flashes of memories continue repeat in like fragments that can be reassembled into a chronology of the whole shocking scene. Since some might not be recovered, there are difficulties in justifying if there resurfacing memories are not affected by deliberate lies, misremembering or honest mistakes.(Elizabeth F. Loftus, 1993). It is therefore possibly that resurfacing memories could be hallucination-mediated, fantasies, illusions, a combination of borrowed ideas from characters, myths, accounts from heard sources with “idiosyncratic internal beliefs” .(Elizabeth F. Loftus, 1993), or intentionally derived defense mechanism. However, the qualities of many resurfacing memories are so detailed, vivid and chronological, and considered true. A lot of anecdotal reports from psychotherapist, journal reviews, and criminal records, with supporting witnesses, cancel the idea of pseudo-memories and authenticate the whole idea. The only setback is the lack of concrete empirical scientific observations from experimental
It’s also evident from George Franklin’s murder case, that something always induces or spark the recovery process. I consider it to be kind of repressed memory stimulant. Flashes of memories continue repeat in like fragments that can be reassembled into a chronology of the whole shocking scene. Since some might not be recovered, there are difficulties in justifying if there resurfacing memories are not affected by deliberate lies, misremembering or honest mistakes.(Elizabeth F. Loftus, 1993). It is therefore possibly that resurfacing memories could be hallucination-mediated, fantasies, illusions, a combination of borrowed ideas from characters, myths, accounts from heard sources with “idiosyncratic internal beliefs” .(Elizabeth F. Loftus, 1993), or intentionally derived defense mechanism. However, the qualities of many resurfacing memories are so detailed, vivid and chronological, and considered true. A lot of anecdotal reports from psychotherapist, journal reviews, and criminal records, with supporting witnesses, cancel the idea of pseudo-memories and authenticate the whole idea. The only setback is the lack of concrete empirical scientific observations from experimental