Preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Fatter, Bigger And Cheaper'

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
148 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Fatter, Bigger And Cheaper'
The claim that the farmer is using in this video is that "Fatter , Bigger, and Cheaper" livestock isn't better than grass-fed livestock. The rhetorical appeal they used in this video is Logos due to the everything they talk about that is a system for farmer markets and farms. Some evidence that shows he used logos, is when he talked about the way they grow their livestock is in disagreement with the USDA when they have been successful by paying attention to the ecological problems. The USDA kept using the performance of how sanitary they are even thought they had an average CFU of 130. They also grow animals that are mainly grass fed which is way better than corn-fed cows along with taking care of the heavier harvest, transport of cows, food,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Omnivore's Dilemma Summary
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Omnivore's Dilemma Summary

    After reading The Omnivore’s Dilemma CH 8-10 by Michael Pollan, he mainly talks about the organic farms and the importance of grass in farming. Joe Salatin uses many modern technologies and many biological ways to create a natural ecosystem. In Polyface Farm, there are many species of animals and plants, and the fresh grass is all over around which makes the farm more natural. The reason why Salatin consider himself as a “grass farmer” is that the grass has a high status in Salatin’s farm, which is one of the main factors that make the high quality of this farm. The industrial farm setting includes “a great machine, transforming inputs of seed and fossil energy into outputs of carbohydrate and protein” (Pollan 130). In the other hand, the industrial farm makes everything perform like a machine, which makes the food become not natural any more in the process of producing food. Comparing the Salatin’s farm to the big organic farms, Salatin gets a different farming system, less trading, healthy soils and localized transport. In contrast to the Naylor’s farm, Salatin’s farm seems that he intends to make a more natural crop farming system, and he makes diversified species which keeps the balance of the ecology. I think that it is better to get a small-scale organic farming, which provides the high quality food; however, the requirement of the organic food is much higher than the outputs of the small-scale organic farming so that…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Home And Family Farm
    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Home And Family Farm

    The thesis of this video is that home/family-run farms run the right way and naturally but efficiently can be more successful than corporate factory farms while having cleaner and natural produces (meat) and harvests. The rhetorical appeals of this video is based on ethos - representing credibility and appeal. The 2 examples of ethos appeal in this video are, first in general, displaying himself as a family/natural farmer conducting his daily chores and working on the farm the "right way" by his definition. Secondly, the farmer is showing the natural conductivity's effectiveness on his farm while bashing the corporate farms and slaughter houses/factories for their ignorance on the way they run their factories and the abuse of integrity on…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Of The Only Way To Have A Cow By Bill Mckibben
    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analysis Of The Only Way To Have A Cow By Bill Mckibben

    The Only Way to Have a Cow" by Bill McKibben tries to inform humans to decrease the intake of meat eating and how this habit could harm our environment. Cow would release harmful substance like methane when they fart or belch. These actions could actually lead to a bigger problem, global warming. Turning into vegans could make environment more friendly. Eating grass fed cows are more healthy that eating corn fed cows. However another problem forms, grass fed cows are more expensive then corn fed grass which causes people with low incomes couldn't afford to eat…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fast Food and Samantha Guerra Period
    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fast Food and Samantha Guerra Period

    In this advertisement ethos is illustrated by having the cows hold the signs that read “EAT MOR CHIKIN”. The cows are not really saying it because they really want us to eat more chicken, but instead it is to show that the cows have united in an effort to reform American food, in an effort to reduce the amount of beef consumed. They wish the American public to refrain from eating beef burgers, and instead focus on eating chicken.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Feedlots In John Robbins's Diet For A New America
    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Feedlots In John Robbins's Diet For A New America

    But a cow’s digestive system is not designed to digest corn and all the feeding causes massive health problems in cows” (Robbins 2). I believe that owners of the feedlots should not feed their cattle grain, even though it makes the cattle grow faster and is probably cheaper. I personally believe that everyone should do what is healthier for the cattle and those eating the cattle. Instead they should allow the cattle to graze, allowing them to become more lean and healthy. If they were to do this then the meat from the cattle would have less fat, therefore be healthier. Instead they not only feed the cattle corn, but also give them antibiotics to keep the animal “healthy.” In reality, this is not making them any healthier, but instead is producing a meat that is a larger money maker for the cattle…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Vegans vs. Meateaters
    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Vegans vs. Meateaters

    feathery chickens that run wildly about, and the pink pigs that roll in the mud. We may also sing about that nice farmer, Old McDonald, and all of his nice animals. The truth is that Old McDonald with a straw hat has been replaced by a business man in the hard hat. Ninety-five percent of the meat we eat does not come from Old McDonald's farm. Hens, chickens, turkeys, and over half of beef cattle, dairy cows, and pigs come from an “animal factory" which is a mechanized environment. This new farming method finds blue skies, tall silos, and grassy hillsides good for calendars but, bad for business. Those pictures are not cost effective. Animals are not treated with the loving care of a farmer but, are treated like inmates on death row.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap lang food Inc logical fallacies

    • 1923 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ap lang food Inc logical fallacies

    To begin with, the film argues against the corporate interests and works to make its audience view the companies as exploitative of being the ones who are exploiting the farmers and taking them away from their traditions. For example, at one point, one of the farmers who was interviewed said, “theyThey not only changed the chicken, they changed the farmer...today chicken farmers no longer control their birds. A company like Tyson owns the birds from the day they are dropped off to the day they are slaughtered.” This statement makes companies like Tyson look like they are completely responsible for the way that farmers now farm and for the lack of control that a farmer has over the way that he choseschooses to raise his chickens. This logical fallacy doesn’t state how such companies control the chickens and how they have “changed the…

    • 1923 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fast Food Rhetorical Analysis
    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page

    Fast Food Rhetorical Analysis

    Most people are visual and many organizations use graphics in advertisement or communication to relay information with the public. However, just like a fast food advertisement showcasing a delectable burger stacked with perfect vegetables and mouthwatering (animal of your choice) is not ‘exactly’ what you get, but a representation of the included ingredients. Not only is this one way honesty and integrity is misrepresented, but the same is done with graphs in the media, especially concerning political parties and the supposed media’s affiliation when comparing their favored with the opposing party. Some prime example would be misrepresentation with America’s unemployment rate, and when this information is poorly and intentionally designed to…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Omnivore's Dilemma Analysis
    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Omnivore's Dilemma Analysis

    Section Two Pollan brings to light organic foods and the difference between mass produced and local farms. He exaggerates, he describes grass as it is capable of becoming something else. Page 126 “End of season Grasses transformed into 25,000 pounds beef, 50,000 pounds pork, 12,000 broilers, 800 turkeys, 500 rabbits, and 30,000 dozen eggs.” All this is within 100 acres of pasture and it comes to show that grass truelt feeds many and all that feeds…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fast Food Nation Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fast Food Nation Rhetorical Analysis

    Eric Schlosser’s outlook on fast food is negative. Schlosser argues that fast food and fast food chains are the reason behind obesity in America, as well as health issues. He backs up his argument against fast food by spending over two years traveling around the world researching why he believes fast food only leads to negative affects, and then he writes about it in his book, Fast Food Nation. Schlosser emphasizes throughout the book that fast food industry has contributed to changes in urban life, and has impacted American culture for the worse. Eric Schlosser’s attentive analyzations and his effective use of persuasion using logos, ethos and pathos convinces the reader about the fast foods negative impact on the economy and society. Schlosser's use of these three rhetorical devices helps the reader understand how strong his views are on fast food, and just how passionate he feels on sharing another, better perspective,…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Food Inc. Research Paper
    • 355 Words
    • 1 Page

    Food Inc. Research Paper

    The United States has grown so much in the food industry from the past. One of the industries which accounts for most of the market in the US is the meat packing industry. The top 5 meat industries controlled 25% of the market back in 1970, and now that number has risen to an outstanding 80% of the market (“100 Days of Real Food”). This is indeed a great accomplishment for our country; however what is the secret behind these companies success? The answer is simple; Make and sell cheap food products and end up getting enormous income! When companies use this method, the food that they are selling is not of best quality and is always unhealthy for the consumers. Michael Pollan a food expert says, “Cows are not designed by evolution to eat corn. They’re designed by evolution to eat grass. And the only reason we feed them corn is because corn is really cheap and corn makes them fat quickly … The industrial food system is always looking for greater efficiency. But each new step in efficiency leads to problems. If you take feedlot cattle off their corn diet, give them grass or five days, they will shed eighty percent of the E. coli in their gut” (Foodincmovie). There have been many cases where children have died just by eating food that has been processed by the food industries. Barbara Kowalcyk, a woman whose 2-year old son went from a perfectly healthy boy to...…

    • 355 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay
    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    The author starts off strong with logos, which appeals to logic. In response to the comments about animals in our food production, she writes, “the studies show only that the prevailing methods of producing meat — that is, crowding animals together in factory farms, storing their waste in giant lagoons and cutting down forests to grow crops to feed them — cause substantial greenhouse gases” (Niman), meaning that small farms and farms can cut down on greenhouse gases if, “they keep their animals outdoors on pasture and make little use of machinery.” (Niman) She points out, “In contrast to traditional farms, industrial livestock and poultry facilities keep animals in buildings with mechanized systems for feeding, lighting, sewage flushing, ventilation, heating and cooling, all of which generate emissions,” which are what most statistics pointing the guilt finger at meat production are referring to. The author, being a “rancher…who raises cattle, goats and turkeys the traditional way (on grass)” (Niman), neatly brushes off relations of “meat (especially beef) is closely linked to global warming” (Niman), to her own farm. Meat and dairy would certainly win the greenhouse gas competition if not…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Down On The Factory Farm Analysis
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Down On The Factory Farm Analysis

    Singer’s article criticizes factory farms for industrializing their farming practices and sacrificing good animal husbandry practices for increases in production. Singer indicates the ridiculous amount of animals affected by factory farm mistreatment by stating “[t]he use and abuse of animals raised for food far exceeds, in sheer numbers of animals affected, any other kind of mistreatment” (“Down on” 19). Singer evaluates the reasoning behind factory farmer’s unethical practices, and concludes that “farming is competitive and the methods adopted are those that cut costs and increase production” (“Down on” 20). By cutting costs and increasing production rates factory farming industry workers accumulate more wealth, and consumers are able consume more meat then physically necessary. One can evaluate this luxury the “Principle of Disproportionality” which states that “[a]ctions that meet nonbasic or luxury needs of humans are prohibited when they aggress against the basic needs of animals” (Sterba…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Food Inc
    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Food Inc

    This documentary also covered the meat is being produced in unsafe and unnatural way. While feeding cattle corn is a great way to make them larger quicker, it still is not the right way to feed cattle because feeding them too much corn can cause them to die because of a disease called e-coli. When cattle get this disease it sometimes is not caught and the cow gets slaughtered and ends up on our dinner plate and then we receive the disease by eating the meat. This needs to change cows need to be fed grass and hay, and should not be on a corn only diet.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Only Way To Have A Cow By Bill Mckiibben Summary
    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Only Way To Have A Cow By Bill Mckiibben Summary

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics