Rhetorical Analysis Of Sojourner Truth

Being a Woman, and a Woman of color in the early 1800’s wasn’t easy. Sojourner Truth, formally known as Isabella Baumfree, is one of the many female suffragist to break the barriers of being silenced. Truth was born into slavery, owned by a wealthy Dutch Family. Eventually, she got away from slavery, and started a new life in New York. She was known for her activism for suffragist, and abolitionists. However, she didn’t start off with a huge audience. Her public speaking era began on the streets, and inside small churches until the 1850’s. 1851, is when Sojourner Truth presented her most reputable speech, “Ain’t I a woman”, at the Women’s rights convention. Truth captured the audience’s attention with her credibility, reasoning, and emotionally connecting with the audience while miraculously keeping her stance in the debate over Women’s rights.
Therefore, she’s insinuating that her opinion is valid. This can be labeled as a rhetorical way to communicate with the audience, which is also called Ethos. She points out the common belief from men that women aren’t capable of being intellectuals. Again, she uses herself to verify her argument, by speaking from a woman’s point of view. Truth sustains the attempt by referring women’s brains as “pints”. Yes, pints are small, but what’s wrong with filling them until they’re full(Sojourner Truth, “Address at the Woman’s rights convention in Akron, ohio)? Yes, women are thought of as small-minded beings, but what’s wrong with them learning until they’ve reached their pinnacle(Sojourner Truth, “Address at the Woman’s rights convention in Akron, ohio)? Furthermore, she does more than listing