Preview

Robber Barons or Industrial Statesmen

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
396 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Robber Barons or Industrial Statesmen
The three men, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan, were seen as robber barons BUT they were also seen as industrial statesmen. Robber baron was a term given to the rich who would pretty much do anything for money whether that meant the jeopardy of workers’ lives and crooked business practices. John D. Rockefeller started a standard oil company and was the first American billionaire. John R. was considered a robber baron mainly because he used his insight of business to ruthlessly force other oil and petroleum companies out of business, and whom managed to hide it all from the public. Rockefeller also, asked the railroad for secret rebates, thought only about money, and decisively brought the strongest men to his sides in order to completely envelop other oil and petroleum companies while at the same time taking no ones’ feelings into account. Andrew Carnegie was an industrialist and a philanthropist. Andrew started a steel company that revolutionized steel production. The way Andrew obtained the label of being a robber baron was by the way he ran his company. Although he made tons of money he, paid low wages, his workers suffered horrible and very unsafe conditions, and he took advantage of the government. J.P. Morgan, financier, art collector, and philanthropist. He was criticized for creating monopolies by making it difficult for any business to compete against his. Morgan dominated two industries in particular—he helped consolidate railroad industry in the East and formed the United States Steel Corporation in 1901. With J.P. and how he was considered to be a robber baron was through his tactics. One of the main reasons people considered John Pierpont Morgan as a robber baron was because of his process known as “Morganization.” In this process, he would take over troubled businesses and reorganize them in order to return them to profitability. Although they came across as being mean-spirited and ruthless, they weren’t all full of bad

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I've never viewed either of these men as bad men or as robber baron, i've always admires the men of the 19th and 20th century who saw these new industries developing and adapted to make a mostly honest profit. These men were friends of consumers because the put pressure on their competitors to provide better goods and services and reasonable prices. They embraces competition, made good products and sold them for low prices. When companies compete the consumer usually…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Pierpont Morgan was a successful financer, that more than once saved the U.S economy; he would manipulate the economy to his will, before the Federal Reserve was assembled. As a result in order to acquire all of this power he would create monopolies. John Pierpont Morgan was trying to create a steel monopoly, and was already a stockholder of every railroad company. According to investopedia John would merge with other strong competitors, this would expand his reach throughout the market and have more control over certain businesses, as well reduce competition, therefore, creating monopolies. Under those circumstances, people started questioning the immense control that he held over the economy, he was praised and criticized for his involvement…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John D. Rockefeller has earned a spot in the hall of shame. He became wealthy because of ruthless and dishonorable business tactics which then hurt the nation. Rockefeller became wealthy because, he lowered his prices way down and forced the Pennsylvania Railroad to lower their prices, and he also ran smaller companies out of business and then took them over for his own. After he took over most of the smaller businesses, he raised his own prices back up in order to bring in a bigger profit. Rockefeller’s robber baron side was reflected by this action because, he went behind people’s backs and turned the other way when it came to business partners.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morgan,Rockefeller and Carnegie were robber barons They were considered cruel and ruthless. Carnegie made his employees work long hours and gave them little pay he even tried to stop unions in his company. Employees pointed out that Rockefeller could have paid his workers a fairer wage and settled for being a half billionaire. Morgan criticized for creating monopolies by making it difficult for any business to compete against his.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The industrial capitalists of the late 19th century should be regarded “Robber Barons” for many reasons. One example was with religious places. Money corrupts anyone. Many people think that if they had that much power or money, then they’d only do good with it, and help everyone, but in the end, it corrupts them all. It’s human nature to want power and money and humans do what it takes to do so.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robber Barons was the negative term for the titans of industry or, as Professor Donald Miller calls them, the capitalist conquistadors. These were the guys like Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Gustavus Swift, Philip Armour, John D. Rockefeller and others who rose to the top and ran monopolies or near-monopolies in the Gilded Age (1870s-1900ish). They were seen as bad because they employed ruthless methods to run competion out of the market, but on the other hand, weren't breaking any laws or rules in this laissez faire timeperiod. These guys also gave a lot of money away: Carnegie built tons of libraries, and Carnegie Mellon University got a lot from him,…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2000 Dbq Analysis

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Carnegie did believe in survival of the fittest and that the rich was more competent and educated than the poor, middle class but, he also believed in aiding the less fortunate in a non-direct way by “ ...bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer,...”(Doc 4). In controlling multiple industries he provided the less fortunate with jobs and work experience, bettering them in a non-direct way. John D. Rockefeller on the other hand believed in boosting himself using horizontal integration, monopolizing the smaller businesses, expanding his industry further and further. Rockefeller once had monopolized almost 90% of the oil and oil refining businesses. He lowered his prices to attract a customer base slowly eliminating all of his competitors by either buying them out or forcing them out of business, to then jack up his prices once he owned most of the industry. Because of his monopoly in the oil industry he and the railroad tycoon Vanderbilt were in league together giving “discriminating rates” to outside , small business competitors (Doc 7). In 1890 the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed to…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of the time were John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan. The definition of a…

    • 600 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today, we know that John D Rockefeller the founder of Standard Oil company used his power to eliminate his competitors and tried to create a monopoly in oil industry. He made secret rebates with railroad companies, so railroads gave his company a lower rate than his competitors. As a result, he could drive out them from the market. In order to destroy the competitors, he raised prices in the areas with no competition, and lower prices in the areas with competition. His strategies ruined competitors, and made them to sell out or go bankrupt. He was considered a ruthless or tyrant who had a lot of enemies, but it was not considered illegal or unethical to monopolize an industry. I think after his first priority which was making money, he was…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1860 Dbq Analysis

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document 7 it states that “In 1882 the Carnegie Steel Company...inaugurated a policy whose object was to control all factors which contributed to the production of steel, from the ore and coal in the ground to the steel billet and the steel rail.” Andrew Carnegie’s company basically owned iron mines, steel mills, railroads, and shipping lines. Rockefeller used his profits to buy other oil companies and ended rivalry in the oil industry by forming the Standard Oil Trust. J.P. Morgan created a banking monopoly, Swift and Armour possessed meat packing, and Vanderbilt created a railroad…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I thought that people like Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.p Morgan were all robber barons. Because they would employ people and put them in these unsafe, and unsanitary conditions. Also they made education for immigrants coming in difficult because even though they built libraries and hospitals would the immigrants would be illiterate and not be able to pay for hospital bills. Lastly theses men were robber barons because they were using vertical integration and horizontal integration to take over small businesses and to raise prices on railroads.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What made them such a bad person? We all go through life learning these basic…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    J.P. Morgan: the banker who bought the Carnegie steel empire which became the core of the United States Steel Company.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robber Barons Men

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page

    These 3 men are robber barons because they all treated their men with disrespect. They made them work in harsh conditions, with low pay, and super long hours. They also discouraged unions between the workers and even tried to stop them.This is showing disrespect by them not letting the workers have a break and time to themselves.What they don't realize is no matter how much they get nagged they aren't going to work to their greatest potential because their worn out.Another thing that's cruel is giving them low pay after working all these hours,they may be doing it to save their own money but out of the millions they have they should be giving them a decent amount of money.With them working their workers so hard, it will make them quit then…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    advantage of a naïve and growing economy to reap its benefits without giving anything in…

    • 822 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays