Dave Sharland – Mr. Sharland a physical therapist for the North Florida/South Georgia Veteran’s Administration (VA) reported that during his career, he has participated in over 800 physical therapy visits in home settings and been very positive. The Council questioned Mr. Sharland on licensure requirements, technical platform, types of services offered, and patient and patient representative access to services. Mr. Sharland to explain the health care providers working with the VA are only required to obtain a license in one state, but they are limited to providing services to only VA patients. He noted that that necessary technology is sometimes provided directly to patients and that in other instances the patient is responsible for purchasing…
Steven Truscott was a Canadian man. He was born in Vancouver, British Columbia. He was sentenced for death in 1959 for the murder of Lynne Harper. His death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment and he continued to maintain his innocence until 2007, when his conviction was declared a miscarriage of justice and he was formally acquitted of the crime. Truscott was scheduled to be hanged. On December 8, 1959; however, a temporary reprieve on November 20, 1959 postponed his execution to February 16, 1960 to allow for an appeal. On January 22, 1960, his death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment. On November 29, 2001, Truscott filed a section 690 Criminal code application for a review of his 1959 murder conviction. Hearings…
Date of Decision: June 28th, 1996. The portion of the regulations, which permitted cable operators to restrict offensive or indecent programming on leased cable channels, was constitutional. However, those portions of the regulations, which allowed the operator, tore strict such programming on public access channels, and which required cable operators to put patently offensive programming on separate channels, which cannot be received unless a viewer requests to have the channel "unblocked," were unconstitutional restrictions on free speech.…
Emmett Till was a 14 year old African American boy who was brutally beaten and murdered for allegedly whistling at a white woman. Emmett Till grew up in a working class family and never experienced much segregation (1). Till went to a segregated school in Chicago. At age five he had gotten polio so he whistled for his stutter. A few days after Emmett flirted with a cashier, he was kidnapped and savagely killed by her husband and brother. He was visiting family in Money, Mississippi and supposedly whistled at Carolyn Bryant.Carolyn’s husband and brother-in-law, Roy and Milam, found out what Emmett did so, they brutally murdered Emmett. They gouged his eye out, shot him in the head, and threw him in a river. Roy and Milam were not indicted…
Almost all of the rights protected by the First Amendment are governed by the same legal standard, developed in a case called Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987). In Turner, prisoners in Missouri brought a class action lawsuit challenging a regulation that limited the ability of prisoners to write letters to each other. The Supreme Court used the case to establish a four-part test for First Amendment claims. There are four questions that are asked using this test: 1. Is the regulation reasonably related to a legitimate, neutral government interest? 2. Does the regulation leave open another way for you to exercise your constitutional rights? 3. How does the issue impact other…
The Jacob Wetterling case is, at its core, a dispute over whether access to nonessential government files by the press, specifically investigative reports, or the privacy rights of individuals is ensured by the Constitution of the United States and without the realm of the state. The family of Jacob Wetterling, a young boy who was abducted and murdered in 1989, issued a lawsuit against the Stearns County as it prepared to release the opened state files to government watchdog groups and media coalitions as per their requests and state law. The investigation itself has been closed and a conviction issued, so the basis for the Wetterling’s lawsuit is a concern that their privacy is being violated as the files contain information they deem confidential.…
The challenges that Rod Serling faced were because the censors were censor his controversial topics. One of the more legendary cases of this was in 1956, when a penned script for the kidnapping and murder of Emmett Till, was whittled down until nearly none of the original plot remained. Rod Serling's ideas were always censored because of their controversial ideals. He choose to write Sci-fi as a way to express his anger. He expressed his anger at topics such as racism, Cold War Paranoia, the horrors of war and many others. Using Sci-fi, he expressed his anger about these taboo and sensitive topics without fear of censorship. He never gave up on trying to find a way to express his anger.…
Another issue that is being battled are the profanity laws, laws to control "obscene" material. ACLU believes that "a free and equitable society should ensure each individual the privilege to choose what craftsmanship or stimulation they read, watch, or listen to" which implies everyone has the option to see and acquire media in which they need. Since whats "obscene" is not a widespread understanding, what is considered obscene is made up because of situations. This is likewise contradicting with the constitution particularly, in light of the fact that America is a vote based nation. In the 1997, the Supreme Court ruling against the communication decency act of the Reno v ACLU case. This made a more extensive protection that restrains the content of what's communicated on the radio and television. I bolster ACLU in light of the fact that I trust that we as a whole have voices and we ought to have the capacity to convey what needs be however to the degree where our message is heard yet non…
“When I was at church they taught me something else/ If you preach hate at the service those words aren't anointed/ That holy water that you soak in has been poisoned/ When everyone else is more comfortable remaining voiceless/ Rather than fighting for humans that have had their rights stolen/ I might not be the same, but that's not important/…
Nowadays, we probably take for granted that the majority of films created in Hollywood have no moral or content boundaries whatsoeverAlthough today the boundaries might seem a little blurred, it was not always like this. The censorship process in Hollywood films (as well as in many other media) is a process that has grown and fluctuated along with American society. Behind many of these films there have been struggles, debates, and confrontations of ideas to have power over what could be shown. Films have always been a main target for censorship, primarily because movies are a major audiovisual form of entertainment and mass communication with a tremendous power over the public.…
Shirley Chisholm's speech,” Equal Rights for Women”, is about equal rights for women. When a women graduates and looks for a job she is most likely going to be asked “ Do you type?” as the first question in an interview. This is prejudice due to men thinking women can only be secretaries and librarians while men are managers and administrators. The term happy little homemaker and contented old darkey are also prejudice as they assume that one person is happy in their position when they might not be.…
In “The Call of The Wild” Buck gets kidnapped, watches his friend die, and kills a dog. I didn’t find this story to be entertaining. Censoring this wouldn't have changed anything about this story, except making it more boring for the people that did enjoy reading this. Plus it’s not like censoring the stuff will make us magically forget about violence or other stuff that I’m not sure I’m allowed to mention in this letter, and that also helps me prove my point that people act like if you ignore things that are natural and happen every day all over the world then it will all magically disappear. In “the Call of the Wild” the main character kills another dog. Censoring this wouldn’t change the fact that he killed a dog and that we know that there is violence in our world so it's pointless. Others may say that some younger audiences may not be able to handle more sensitive topics and that even older people might not like violence or certain topics. While that may be true, all those people can just stay away from content that they don’t like and let the ones who do like it enjoy…
Movies, everyone has seen them and they play a huge part in our world today. Much of our entertainment comes from movies, along with our understanding of historical events. It use to be that we received our knowledge from books and more credible sources, but now an emerging age of , well for lack of a better word "laziness" has resulted in many people receiving their history from Hollywood. Now there is a fine line when it comes to Hollywood credibility, simply for the fact that directors want to captivate audiences through added pizzazz that might not exactly correlate with the actual event. A great example of this happening is with the 1988 film Mississippi Burning, in which the murders of three civil rights workers working down in Mississippi during the freedom summer is interpreted and made into a movie. Though this film won an Oscar and did a decent job of conveying what really happened, there were some inconsistencies, stretchers, and overall misconceptions regarding the event in question and the civil rights movement as a whole.…
McCarthy did not like the idea of doing the dog lab because she found it unethical to use dogs as the experimental subject. She could have learned the material in other ways. For example, many other animals that were similar to humans could be used for experimentation. Despite her emotional struggle, she made up her mind to participate in the lab and help anesthetize the dogs. After doing the lab, she felt regretful for her decision. She stressed her sadness and grief, “I was disappointed in the lab and disappointed in myself for doing it. I know now that doing the lab was wrong. Maybe not wrong for everyone—it was clearly a complicated and individual choice—but wrong for me.”(McCarthy, p484) Though dogs are being killed humanely, it’s unacceptable to kill innocent animals in order to gain knowledge especially because she unconsciously attached more emotion to dogs. The fondness she has for dogs makes her change her position. She wishes she could be the person she was before and make decisions without worrying about what a doctor would do. Similarly, King felt discontent and dissatisfied with the segregation and unjust laws when making an ethical decision. He revealed the unfair treatment that the colored suffered, “When you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brother at…
Teachers suspended, radio and television personalities fired, authors disinvited to speaking events, all because their words, views and shows did not agree with what a handful of people consider appropriate. One would think these types of situations regarding censorship happened decades ago, not in a time now, where people pride themselves on having an open-mind and the ability of forward thinking. However, censorship still prevails in America today, and not only censorship of pornography or violence on television, but it seeps into our textbooks and classrooms too, all in the name of protecting the children.…