Preview

Roland Freisler's Trial At Volksgericht

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
103 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roland Freisler's Trial At Volksgericht
On Monday, February 22, 1943 at 10:00 A.M., Hans and Sophie Scholl, along with Christoph Probst, were given trial at Volksgericht or, the People’s Court. This court regularly convicted a defendant and sentenced the person to death. The three were judged by Roland Freisler.

The defendants were allowed to offer a brief version of the events while Freisler continuously interrupted with rages, rants, and jumping to his feet. He conducted himself more as a prosecutor rather than a judge. While Sophie defended her actions, Christoph asked clemency as his wife was ill and his children would be left fatherless if he were executed.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the attempt had failed, “Hitler told German radio listeners a coup by a ‘clique of ambitious, conscienceless, and criminal and stupid officers’ had failed and would be dealt with in true National Socialist fashion” (McDonough). Five thousand people who were against Hitler were executed that day (McDonough). “In an attempt to protect himself, Fromm organized the execution of Stauffenberg along with three other conspirators in the courtyard of the War Ministry” (“Claus von…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 2 Journal

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was interesting to think how dangerous having truth commissions were since the people being tried still had connections to their superiors. The article explained how in certain situations, the truth commotions were forced to be private, in order to keep those associated with the trial…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bennet began his second day of trial against Dr. Wecht in Pittsburgh 2008. Be ynnet still feels so uncomfortable having to testify against Wecht, but he still had no choice in the matter. Bennet just wanted to go back to his wife and home in California. The defendant lawyer than began his questioning on Bennet. He asked Bennet about how he was paid, if he was afraid during the FBI investigation, and about his immigration. Finally he asked Bennet about CTE and his discovery. He asked Bennet about the publicity that came along with it and Bennet says that he does not like it and sometimes wishes he never discovered the disease because of all the trouble that has come along with it. The trial ends 10 days later in a hung jury in April of 2008.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He would refuse the request because he thought that it was unjust. “It always seemed to me inhuman and a travesty of justice if the executioner asked the victim to forgive” (207-208). Wiesenthal's anger was righteous because being in the place that he was in, the soldier probably is asking forgiveness to make himself feel better before he dies. Wiesenthal knows that the soldier is asking for forgiveness to the wrong person.The author organized his symposium by stating his opinion…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These were not speedy trials, so those who were accused of a crime often languished in prison awaiting their trial and ultimately, their fate. This gave them time to reflect on their upcoming punishment or execution. If they were sentenced to death, not only were these individuals going to be executed, but they were also forced to contribute to the spectacle of their death. For example, criminals “were driven from the prison to their deaths sitting with their coffins” (Executions 1). Such a thing would be considered by most as a further insult to injury. In particular the last words of nine different individuals will be examined in the paragraphs below. In order to properly convey these accounts in a historical context we will discuss the individuals in chronological order beginning with the year 1708 and ending with the year 1793, illustrating…

    • 2969 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    does not explicitly state that he is against the death penalty, his writing style subtly suggests that…

    • 567 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people have thought of the Nuremburg Trials as a very controversial topic, but I really only see one side to it. In my opinion, I believe that the Nuremburg Trials was a good and fair way to bring German military officials to justice. Firstly, after what they had done to the Jews, the Trials were the least that the Allies could have done. During WWII, the Nazi’s altogether managed to murder over 6 million Jews across Europe, so punishing the people who participated in the genocide wouldn’t be unfair at all. Therefore, the men who were forced to attend the Nuremburg Trials deserve to face the consequences for their crimes against humanity. In addition, if the trials never happened, the tragedy that happened to the Jewish population would have been left unanswered. For example, there were many Jewish holocaust survivors that had lost family and friends who were desperately looking for justice and revenge. For the sake of all the tragedies that the Jews had to face, the…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trials were a series of military courts, held by the Allied forces of World War II, defendent for the courts were men in the political, military, and economic leadership of the Nazi Germany. The first and best known of these trials was the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which was aginst 22 of the most important captured leaders of Nazi Germany. It was held from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. The second set of trials of lesser war criminals was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10 at the US Nuremberg Military Tribunals; among them included the Doctors' Trial and the Judges'…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Maximilian was sent free years later, he was recaptured and sent to a concentration camp in Auschwitz. It was at this camp where three prisoners escaped making the deputy commander in charge furious. As a punishment, the deputy ordered to choose 10 random men to starve to death to teach the other prisoners a lesson. Franciszek Gajowniczek was one of the chosen. He was a Polish husband and a father of two sons. When his name was called, Franciszek begged not to be killed, in fact, he yelled he had a family. In the meantime, Maximilian Kolbe saw was happening and asked the deputy if he could take his place instead. Consequently, Kolbe was executed with a lethal injection along the other prisoners on August 14, 1941.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Thomas Robinson Trial

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The most controversial issue in this story is probably the Thomas Robinson trial. The entire town of Maycomb was involved in this trial, and each took sides. I am certain that Thomas was innocent because all of the evidence pointed back to the “victim” and her father. I am 100% certain that Thomas is innocent because the bruises on the victim, 19-year-old Mayella Ewell, could only have been caused by a left-handed person. Thomas, however, lost all mobility in his whole left arm after a cotton gin accident as a child resulted in his entire left arm to be crippled.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Ultimate Punishment, Van Den Haag talks about the death penalty in the United States and takes the stance that it is morally justifiable and sometimes needs to be a punishment that is used to gain retribution. He states, “It ends the existence of those punished, instead of temporarily imprisoning them.” A murderer has taken away the lives of other people, as well as punishing the family members indirectly causing them pain. Therefore not only is this retribution to the person who was killed, but also to the people that the victim was survived by.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dread tribunal of five Judges, Public Prosecutor, and determined Jury, sat every day. Their lists went forth every evening, and were read out by the gaolers of the various prisons to their prisoners. The standard gaoler-joke was, “Come out and listen to the Evening Paper, you inside there!”…

    • 8941 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eugenia Ginzburg was officially prosecuted for acts of terrorism. She was told by officials that she was being charged with the murder of Kirov and when she told told them she was never in Leningrad they responded by saying to her, “it was your accomplices who killed him, and that makes you morally and criminally responsibly”. It’s clear that she truly had nothing to do with his murder, yet there was no getting out of it. For this Ginzburg was given “ten…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death of Ivan Ilych

    • 22553 Words
    • 91 Pages

    During an interval in the Melvinski trial in the large building of the Law Courts the members and public prosecutor met in Ivan Egorovich Shebek's private room, where the conversation turned on the celebrated Krasovski case. Fedor Vasilievich warmly maintained that it was not subject to their jurisdiction, Ivan Egorovich maintained the contrary, while Peter Ivanovich, not having entered into the discussion at the start, took no part in it but looked through the Gazette which had just been handed in. "Gentlemen," he said, "Ivan Ilych has died!" "You don't say so!" "Here, read it yourself," replied Peter Ivanovich, handing Fedor Vasilievich the paper still damp from the press. Surrounded by a black border were the words: "Praskovya Fedorovna Golovina, with profound sorrow, informs relatives and friends of the demise of her beloved husband Ivan Ilych Golovin, Member of the Court of Justice, which occurred on February the 4th of this year 1882. The funeral will take place on Friday at one o'clock in the afternoon." Ivan Ilych had been a colleague of the gentlemen present and was liked by them all. He had been ill for some weeks with an illness said to be incurable. His post had been kept open for him, but there had been conjectures that in case of his death Alexeev might receive his appointment, and that either Vinnikov or Shtabel would succeed Alexeev. So on receiving the news of Ivan Ilych's death the first thought of each of the gentlemen in that private room was of the changes and promotions it might occasion among themselves or their acquaintances. "I shall be sure to get Shtabel's place or Vinnikov's," thought Fedor Vasilievich. "I was promised that long ago, and the promotion means an extra eight hundred rubles a year for me besides the allowance." "Now I must apply for my brother-in-law's transfer from Kaluga," thought Peter Ivanovich. "My wife will be very glad,…

    • 22553 Words
    • 91 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Gentleman of the jury, be merciful. For God’s sake, be merciful. He is innocent of all charges brought against him. But let us say he was not. Let us say for a moment he was not. What justice would there be to take this life? Justice gentleman? Why I would just as soon put a hog in the electric chair as this”. (Chap. 1, pg. 8) My analysis of this story weighs on multiple dynamics:…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays