Preview

Bennet's Trial Against Dr. Wecht

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
407 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bennet's Trial Against Dr. Wecht
Bennet began his second day of trial against Dr. Wecht in Pittsburgh 2008. Be ynnet still feels so uncomfortable having to testify against Wecht, but he still had no choice in the matter. Bennet just wanted to go back to his wife and home in California. The defendant lawyer than began his questioning on Bennet. He asked Bennet about how he was paid, if he was afraid during the FBI investigation, and about his immigration. Finally he asked Bennet about CTE and his discovery. He asked Bennet about the publicity that came along with it and Bennet says that he does not like it and sometimes wishes he never discovered the disease because of all the trouble that has come along with it. The trial ends 10 days later in a hung jury in April of 2008.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Officer LESSANE met the DEFENDANT PHILLIP SCARBROUGH at the Law Enforcement Center in reference to warrant service. The DEFENDANT was placed under arrest and transported to Beaufort County Detention Center per department policy. Warrant # 2016A0720600260 was served and I cleared the call for service.…

    • 45 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case commenced when a group of various parents and families suspected that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause “who is going to apologize to you when you don’t know who did it and pay me” [1], he perceived that 2 corporations sat on the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and filed a major lawsuit, which stated that that the two corporations, W.R Grace and Beatrice Foods, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste.”Lawsuits are a declaration of war. They begin the same way: with a complaint” [1]. The…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Candidate Hecht delivered an incomplete brief. SNC was nervous and unsure of the information he was relaying to his team. This uncertainty was displayed through him constantly repeating himself stumbling or stuttering and briefing the order out of sequence. SNC’s orientation simply stated that his team was located on MCB Quantico, Brown Field. SCN briefed his friendly situation in conjunction with the beginning of his mission statement. SNC failed to brief the entirety of the coordinating instructions. His brief as a whole lacked the structure of a five paragraph order. SNC lacked confidence and due to the lack of information, his order did not completely make sense. Prior to execution, SNC did not establish a plan which made it difficult for…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schiavo's Case Timeline

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    • April 26, 2001: Circuit Judge Frank Quesada orders physicians to reinstate the feeding tube; Schindlers pursue lawsuit against Michael accusing him of perjury for saying under oath that Terri would refuse life support…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Craig Anderson was an African American male, in his late forties, who was murdered in what was classified as a hate crime. In Jackson, Mississippi on a Sunday morning, June 26, 2011, a group of white teenagers had been drinking all night and were on a mission, specifically seeking out a black person to cause harm to. James Anderson happened to be in a parking lot, near his car, when the group of teenagers pulled up and started to beat him while yelling racial slurs at him as well as yelling, “White power”. The teens then proceeded to hop in their truck and encouraged the driver to run over the victim, James Anderson, causing his immediate death. James Anderson was a well loved and respected member of his community, who attended church…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bell, California corruption trial pertains to a group of city officials who misappropriated more than five million dollars of public funds (CNN Wire Staff, 2010). These officials were receiving compensation for conducting phantom meeting, wrote their own employment contracts without the approval of the City Counsel, and authorized approximately two million dollars in loans to their selves (CNN Wire Staff, 2010). To grasp the corruption of the city officials we need analyze the median annual income of the residents of Bell. The median annual income for the residents of Bell is less than thirty-five thousand dollars annually, and Bell’s City Manager Robert Rizzo annual base salary was 787,638 (CNN Wire Staff, 2010). Additionally, Bell’s Chief of Police Randy Adams earned 457,000 annually, and the council members of Bell earned 96,000 annually when the average salary for council members in similar-sized cities is 4,800 annually (CNN Wire Staff, 2010). Ultimately, this lead to the conviction of five elected officials for…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Dr Roylott Guilty

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sherlock was not guilty due to the fact he did not know that Dr. Roylott would be bit by a snake; swamp adder. In the story, “The Adventures of the Speckled Band,” Dr. Roylott was murdered by his snake the he had trained over a period of time. Audience may believe that Sherlock was guilty and many think that he was not. In Sherlock’s offense, he did not mean to kill Dr. Roylott; meaning that the murder of Dr. Roylott was not premeditated. Also, Sherlock was self-defending himself. Sherlock did not want to die and he also had to protect the lives of two other people because it was his job. Helen had to hire Sherlock to protect her from her peculiar husband. Another reason in which that Sherlock should not be guilty is Sherlock did not know that Dr. Roylott was sitting in the chair next to the ventilator. Sherlock was certain that Dr. Roylott killed Julia and wanted to murder Helen due to money concerns.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Twenty-nine years ago on February 23, 23 year old Jaye Potter Mintz was found brutally murdered in her not stark but blood-splattered bedroom by her mother, Lorene Potter. Jaye Potters throat had been slit, her hands tied behind her back, a pillow had covered her face, and she had been raped by her murderer. Potter's son was found crying in a corner holding on for dear life apprehensively as he saw his mother murdered right before his eyes. Earlier that week Potter had put an ad in a newspaper about a waterbed that she was selling, it was believed at the time that the murderer was a possible buyer for the bed and also knew Potter personally.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Hecht Summary

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the issues that Justice Hecht presented is that veterans aren’t getting the basic civil legal services. In other words, when servicemen and women come back home from the military, they are having a hard time finding a job, paying off debt, having their family struggling, and benefits delayed. Hecht has presented that since many veterans are facing this problem when they return home, sometimes these veterans commit suicide by struggling from economic problems. The Supreme Court requested $4 million to help provide legal aid to veterans since many veterans are facing legal problems which they cannot afford lawyers. The Texas Veterans Commission has reviewed the Court’s request and in return they provided $1.5 million for legal aid and…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the History Court’s trial of John Brown, the jury found him to be guilty. John Brown was deemed guilty of being morally unjustified for an insurrection. This insurrection was the killing of several slave owners and their families, and the starting of a slave uprising. The Prosecution made several key points. Their first witness, William Wilberforce, was able to nonviolently stop the slave trade in Britain. Through his use of nonviolence, many people followed him. William stated that it was worth it, although it may have taken longer than if he had used violence. He said that if the process had been faster, people would’ve had to die. The Prosecution’s second witness, Levi Coffin, was an abolitionist and the president of the Underground…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He had another evaluation, being court ordered before his trial. The evaluation was at the Center…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flippery Slope Analysis

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He makes a false conclusion within his own statement, all of the other jurors noticed this at this point. These are the final words of the Man with a Cold before he goes and sits in a corner.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D. , Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Convicting Hester Prynne

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Does the sinner deserve repentance? Do we the right to be merciful or can only the Lord have mercy? Philosophical questions like those are not easy to answer, but thankfully there are pastors and judges to provide us with insight.The crime Hester Prynne has committed is plain adultery. The child she now has is evidence of her crime. Hester Prynne has broken the law, she has shamed her family, and she will sin again.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article by Matthew James Nance titled “A Mockery of Justice” he writes about an inmate’s tale of what happen to David Martin Long in the late 80’s. While David Long was still incarcerated there was a reporter that was interested in writing about his story her name was Laura Miller and in 1994 she came to the prison to interview him. She wrote about his injustice in which he wanted to be executed but because Texas law had an automatic appeal process his execution could not be carried out and therefore no matter how many times that he wanted to oppose this the state of Texas denied him his execution. He tells her about his trial and how short the deliberation was. He goes into great, detail in telling her of his wrong doing and how he knows…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays