Preview

Schiavo's Case Timeline

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1946 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Schiavo's Case Timeline
CASE: Artificial Nutrition and Hydration--
Questions Raised by the Schiavo Case”

Timeline of Schiavo Case

• February 25, 1990: Terri’s heart stops, most likely as a result of a potassium imbalance, causing severe brain damage • November 1992: Terri’s husband, Michael Schiavo, wins malpractice suit; awarded $700,000 for her care plus an additional $300,000 • February 14, 1993: Terri’s parents, Mary and Bob Schindler, and Michael have falling out over Terri’s care • July 29, 1993: Terri’s parents file petition to have Michael removed as guardian but the case is thrown out • May 1998: Michael files petition to remove Terri’s feeding tube • February 11, 2000: Circuit Judge George W. Greer rules feeding tube can be removed • January 24, 2001: 2nd District Court of Appeal upholds Greer’s decision • March 29, 2001: Judge Greer orders feeding tube to be removed 4/20/01 • April 18, 2001: Florida Supreme Court refuses to hear the case • April 20, 2001: U.S. District Judge Richard Lazzara grants the Schindlers a stay until 4/23/01 to exhaust legal options • April 23, 2001: U. S. Supreme Court refuses to hear the case • April 24, 2001: Feeding tube is removed from Terri • April 26, 2001: Circuit Judge Frank Quesada orders physicians to reinstate the feeding tube; Schindlers pursue lawsuit against Michael accusing him of perjury for saying under oath that Terri would refuse life support • October 3, 2001: After hearing arguments from the Schindler’s attorneys citing seven doctors’ views that Terri can recover, the 2nd District Court of Appeal delays removal of feeding tube indefinitely • October 17, 2001: 2nd District Court of Appeal rules that five physicians can examine Terri to determine if she has any hope of recovery, two of which are picked by Schindlers, two by Michael, and one by court • October 12, 2002: Week long hearing begins with three physicians, including the one appointed by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The first time the case went to court was to resolve the dispute over her neurologic devastation and how her parents and her husband were interpreting her wishes regarding life support. The courts ruled in her husband’s favor, that Terri would not want continued life support and the decision was made to withdraw life sustaining treatment. Her parents appealed the decision to remove treatment and won, because their physicians stated that Terri was not in a permanent vegetative state. Her husband and parents again went to court regarding PVS, and once again her husband was granted the right to remove…

    • 2096 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedural History: Lower court entered a directed verdict for Dr. Turk b/c there was an absence of evidence that he intended to inflict personal injury…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Facts: Michael and Theresa Schiavo married on November 10, 1984. They were in a happy relationship and had no children. However on February 25, 1990, Theresa Schiavo had a cardiac arrest from potassium imbalance and hasn’t gained consciousness since. Her life was dependent on feeding tubes and constant care. Throughout the years, Michael maintained a good relationship with Theresa’s parents, Robert and Mary Schindler. However their relationship ended when they stopped talking in 1993. On May 1998, Michael requested the guardianship court to allow him to end the life-prolonging procedures that had kept Theresa alive. Mr. and Mrs. Schindler opposed the petition and went through…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief A4

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On November 11, 1974, Gnazzo had an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted in her uterus for contraceptive purposes. The IUD was developed, marketed and sold by G.D. Searle & Co. (Searle). When Gnazzo’s deposition was taken, she stated that her doctor had informed her that “the insertion would hurt, but not for long,” and that she “would have uncomfortable and probably painful periods for the first three to four months. On October 11, 1975, Gnazzo found it necessary to return to her physician due to excessive pain and cramping. During this visit she was informed by her doctor that he thought she had Pelvic inflammatory Disease (PID). She recalled that he stated that the infection was possibly caused by venereal disease or the use of the IUD. The PID was treated with antibiotics and cleared up shortly thereafter. Less than one year later, Gnazzo was again treated for an IUD-associated infection. This infection was also treated with antibiotics. Gnazzo continued using the IUD until it was finally removed in December of 1977.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Catherine I. Hanson and Astrid G. Meghrigian, Amicus Curiae for California Medical Association in support of Appellant Khajavi.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bennet began his second day of trial against Dr. Wecht in Pittsburgh 2008. Be ynnet still feels so uncomfortable having to testify against Wecht, but he still had no choice in the matter. Bennet just wanted to go back to his wife and home in California. The defendant lawyer than began his questioning on Bennet. He asked Bennet about how he was paid, if he was afraid during the FBI investigation, and about his immigration. Finally he asked Bennet about CTE and his discovery. He asked Bennet about the publicity that came along with it and Bennet says that he does not like it and sometimes wishes he never discovered the disease because of all the trouble that has come along with it. The trial ends 10 days later in a hung jury in April of 2008.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Christine Stevens a Tennessee woman filed a malpractice lawsuit against Hickman Community Hospital, the emergency room services and physicians who cared for her husband Mark Stevens, which subsequently resulted in his demise. The case however is being challenged as a result of failing to comply with regulatory requirements set forth in the Tennessee Medical Malpractice Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    U.s. vs prince

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages

    * After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As three years had passed, Ms. Spears contends that she is a victim of a medical malpractice and of Texas’ newly reformed tort laws. Texas lawmakers unanimously passed a tort reform package in 2003 which topped noneconomic damages that a plaintiff could receive in medical malpractice at $250,000. That became the negligence standard for emergency care. It also required an expert witness to substantiate evidence of negligence before a trial. Tort reform advocates approve the law as a way to reduce frivolous lawsuits against health care providers and organizations. Plaintiffs would be required to find a physician in the equivalent practice to serve as the expert witness. Laws also held plaintiffs accountable for defendants’ legal fees if they are unable to…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Terri Schiavo Case

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On February 28, 1990, twenty six-year old Terri Schiavo suffered severe brain damage when her heart stopped for five minutes. Terri's condition was the subject of intense debate and media scrutiny over the subject of euthanasia and guardianship. Given the circumstances of Terri's vegetated condition, and no physical proof of her wishes, the last word on whether or not Terri would stay alive was given to her husband Michael Schiavo, by the state of Florida. Michael's argument was that he was carrying out her wishes to not be kept alive in that state. Terri's family challenged Michael's claims saying she is responsive and in no discomfort, that her condition does not meet the medical definition of "vegetative," and that she would not wish to die. Although she never wrote a living will expressing a wish to refuse nutrition or medical treatment if disabled, her condition and future life span should have been her family's decision rather then her husbands. Despite of Michael's intentions, the method of starvation as a means of relieving her of her pains and suffering can still be seen as down right unethical as it is immoral. Terri suffered a legal and public murder. Though Mr. Michael Schiavo's intention and objective were presented as selfless, the government had failed to look into other mitigating reasons for his choice.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Tort No Worries

    • 7925 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Anna Katzmann of Counsel, instructed by Leitch Hassan Dent, Solicitors for the Royal North Shore Hospital and Doctors Nicole Williams, Azizi Bakar, Galina Palachevskaia.…

    • 7925 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Terri’s relationships are abusive. While it's clear that Terri and Ed’s relationship is abusive, a little less clear is the abuse of Terri and Mel’s relationship. Ed abused Terri physically, but Mel abused her verbally. Terri seems willing to take any form of abuse without limits. This, however, would just encourage the abusers to abuse her more. it is an endlessly deteriorating cycle. Terri's methods of dealing with abuse seem bad at best.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A case that took place in may 2013, Palmdale, California; an eight year old boy, Gabriel Fernandez, was beaten up and tortured for 8 months until he faced death. He suffered unspeakable, simply revolting, abuse. This special treatment was given by no other than Isauro Aguirre. Just recently in the month of november, 2017, jurors has been conspiring the well earned consequence for Aguirre. Many people have-and still are- fighting for what the young boy could not have voiced out. Innumerable individuals have pulled out all the stops to give this man what he deserves. Eight months of constant abuse; after several reports of probable abuse within the boys home, Gabriel could not be rescued from that nightmare.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1936 was when the act was first put into place against Hubert Moore. Moore was convicted five times for various criminal acts. The Attorney General filed for Moore to be sterilized. When Moore and the other inmate caught word of this they rioted. The riot was so big that many inmate were injured and some escaped including Moore. With Moore on the loose the Attorney General filed for another criminal to be sterilized and this was Jack Skinner. Skinner was convicted three different times. “In 1926 Skinner was convicted of stealing three chickens and sentenced to the State Reformatory. In 1929 he was convicted of armed robbery and returned to the Reformatory. In 1934, he was again convicted of armed robbery but this time sent to the Oklahoma state penitentiary (Skinner v. Oklahoma - Oklahoma Prisoner Sterilization)”. When Skinner heard about this instead of rioting he brought this to court. The Skinner v. Oklahoma was one of the first US Supreme Court cases to introduce the concept of strict scrutiny analysis as a means to evaluate the constitutionality of laws (Gur-Arie). Skinner was prosecuted under the act in front of a jury which he lost. The case was appealed by Skinner's lawyers to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. His lawyers argued that the act is violating the fourteenth amendment. The Court ruled against the appeal and the majority was in favor of the Sterilization Act. The court was five votes…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Damon Weber was an energetic, likable young man whose life ended at the young age of sixteen as a result of what his father, Mr. Weber, believes was a deviation from the expected standard of care at the hand of physicians at the New York Columbia Presbyterian Hospital (Weichselbaum, 2012). As a result, Mr. Weber filed a medical malpractice suit on behalf of Damon against New York Columbia Presbyterian Hospital and the medical director of pediatric heart transplants, Dr. Mason. The case is currently being heard in the Brooklyn Supreme Court. We will take a look at the issues and parties affected in this case as well as the stakeholders involved. When the case is reviewed we will see how this is not just another medical malpractice case of wrongful death. This is a story of change and how one father takes on the “fiefdom” (Weber, 2012) of a world-renowned metropolitan hospital to vindicate the death of his eldest son.…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays