Preview

Rome Vs Carthage

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
415 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rome Vs Carthage
Briefly discuss how the governments of Rome and Carthage differed.

The relationship between Rome and Carthage are most infamous for their conflicts over the course of ancient history (the Punic Wars). In fact, from my point of view, Carthage was only well-known as Rome's rival, thus, the amount of information discussing Carthage's government is not as extensive as their Italian counterpart. The fact that Rome reduced Carthage to ashes also contributed to the problem. Nevertheless, we still have enough information to see how the two governments compare.

Rome and Carthage started out similarly as both of them had some different forms of oligarchy. In Rome, most of the power was placed in the hand of the patricians (ancient.eu, nd), whereas in Carthage, the power belonged to the oligarchs (theancientworlds.net, nd). They both have a few elite ones as heads of state, which with Carthage they were called Suffets (or "judges"), and Consuls in Rome. Those heads of state were nominated by the Roman Senate and Carthaginian Council, which comprised of the aforementioned rich families.

One
…show more content…

Aristotle also suggests that Carthage's government is a mixed of both oligarchy and democracy (livius.org, nd). There was no record on whether Carthage "transform" themselves from oligarchy to democracy like Rome, so I think we can safely say that they started out as such. The reason for this unique form of government (for the time, at least) maybe due to the fact that Carthage started out as a trading empire, so trading was their core interest, they would suffer greatly if their bread and butter were treated poorly. The people assembly of Carthage has much more voice in the city's problem, even more so in the difficult times like the Punic Wars (theancientworld.net, nd). It's a very important to note this point as we will see how Rome differed from that in the next

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 500 years of no nation has everything stayed the same and Rome is no exception. While the economics of Rome managed to stay the same between 100 and 600 CE, and the laws of Rome with it, government and religion in 600 CE would not be recognizable to leaders and civilians from 100 CE.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap World History Dbqs

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Cesare marked the beginning of this empire. They had an autocratic form of government; held lots of land around the Mediterranean and throughout Europe. It was weak partly because of the many civil wars.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discuss the political and economic changes and continuities that occurred as Rome went from a Republic to an Empire…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Romans began a republic which had a 2 consuls, a senate, assemblies, and officials. The consuls were similar to modern day presidents but stayed in office for only a year. The Senate led religious events and foreign policy. It also was in control of the revenue. Roman senate consisted of the wealthy men. The assemblies were created so the people other than the wealthy could have their say in the government. However the people in the assemblies had to be full citizen males, meaning no foreigners or slaves. Roman republic officials did have decent authority but there laws were made to ensure they did not get too much power, leaving more of it to the wealthy. Rome was also centralized, because of its location and saw many migrations and invasions, from Po River people and those in Sicily. At 44 B.C. Rome became an empire, led by an emperor, with senators, advisers, and of course the massive army. Over time, the Roman army became more and more powerful. When Romans would conquer and expand they would normally devastate that area. Eventually, Rome became a military monarchy. Rome then split its empire in two, having a emperor in the west, and another in the east.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Carthaginian government make some valid points in their explanation of the blame for the Second Punic War Hannibal. Both they and Hannibal can be seen to share the responsibility for Carthage’s defeat in the Second Punic War. Hannibal’s quixotic plot to attack Rome without a veritable intention to destroy her left Carthage stranded in a war that would ultimately turn against her. However, the circumstances and misfortunes faced in a war on foreign soil against the might of Rome can at times be seen as beyond Hannibal’s control.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respective form of government of Rome and Carthage has an "outward similarity" in terms of structure. If Rome has two consuls, Carthage on other hand has two chief magistrates called as suffetes. Carthaginians have also a legislative body such like the Roman Senate which is called the hundreds or "the counsel of thirty Nobles" (Mackay, 1999). In addition, it has also a citizen assembly similar to Rome's comitia (Moray,1901). In governmental organization the two two great nations were parallel to each other, however in terms of the internal affairs of their respective states they were entirely antipodal.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Seeing as Rome had a new Democratic government, not one individual could rule. However, they still had votes on who to elect for government and for the contestants it was big competition. According to Document A “Life of Caesar” by Plutarch, even the competition for smaller, miserable-looking communities was tough. This is because there is always “jealous…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republican period of Roman history began in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan kings was dropped. The Republic was controlled by the Senate, which was an assembly by dominated upper-class families. This dominance by the aristocracy led to tensions between the social classes, especially among the lower classes who fought for equality in both the economy and the government. Despite these inner struggles, Rome's military power strengthened throughout the 5th and 4th centuries BCE and by 270 BCE they commanded the entire peninsula. 264 BCE brought the beginning of the three Punic Wars fought against Carthage over control of the western Mediterranean. These resulted in victories for Rome which granted them access to the wealth of Greece, Egypt,…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han and Roman Empires are highly praised with great wealth, inventions, and their success.While both societies saw new technological advancements as necessary, the Han dynasty always sought the most efficient route, the romans prioritized speed and was not very fond of craftsmanship.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome a. Definition of citizenship changed over time b. Pragmatic innovation and adaptation as empire's ideals c. Common language was Latin C. Patterns of imperial expansion 1. Both consolidated their power within their environmental limits using a common legal framework 2. They had different patterns of development, types of public servants, and government practices 3.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rome vs America

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All world powers assert their influence throughout the world by exerting their cultural, economic, diplomatic, or military strength. Of those fur characteristics, however it’s easiest to see the effects that arise when a nation employs its military. By far the least subtle means of establishing supremacy, military conquest is the most direct force used. Nations great enough to be determined a “superpower” has always asserted its power with at least some military might. One of the most admired empires in this regard was the Roman Empire, which showed the importance of an efficient professional military in subjugating and controlling other countries. The American “empire” (for lack of a better word) is a current superpower often compared with Rome, with good reason. Both nations overthrew their suppressive monarchs and gained sovereignty through revolution. America and Rome developed as world powers principally through military conquest. Both nations even declined due to their over reliance of military and the mismanagement of the country’s military finances in their budgets. The Roman Empire and the United States both rose and fell due to their reliance on their military.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The senate was old and stable but still did a great job taking care of countries.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    decided to face the Romans for doing so. This meeting was at Saguntum in 219…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Empires

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Between 200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E. The Roman Empire ruled with an iron fist controlling mostly and if not all of the Mediterranean. This was due to two main factors, these are it military power and the political system it was able to develop. However most of the Romans accomplishment didn’t happen as an empire, but a republic. While as a republic, Romans created a political system that heavily influenced many to move to the Rome. In the article Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer he states that the political system created “a written code of law offered plebeians (the poor class) some protection from abuse” from the upper or elite classes. Also this provided a better “system of public assemblies [that] provided an opportunity for lower classes to shape public policy and a new office of tribune” that would represent them in these assemblies. This was a huge part of Rome popularity and its growing number. This was the first time were the poorer classes had any kind of support from a political system. The Romans had get deal of pride with their newly developed system that benefited everyone. They also believed that the political system gave them a “greater freedom than did many of their more autocratic neighbors.”…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Regarding their social structures, both empires had very similar norms when it came to positions in society. On a the larger scale regarding the entire empires, both had capitals which were the center of wealth and social importance. In important Roman cities such as Rome and Constantinople there was an important…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays