Preview

Roosevelt's Adoption Of The Atomic Bomb

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
261 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roosevelt's Adoption Of The Atomic Bomb
Roosevelt should not have dropped the atomic bomb. First, he shouldn’t have dropped “Little Boy” in Nagasaki because “The explosion in Nagasaki immediately wiped out 90% of the city and it killed over 80,000 people”. That is an incredibly large amount of population. If you think about it, that’s very sad and no one should suffer the attack from a nuclear bomb. Secondly the bomb was illegal to use (yes I said ILLEGAL). “On September 30th, 1938 the League Of Nations issued an unanimous resolution outlawing the intentional bomb of civilian population. In other words the League Of Nations agreed to outlaw the bomb to be used on civilian population. I think the League Of Nations was smart because bombing unarmed civilians is unethical. Thirdly,

Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summer Assignment Guided Questions: Hiroshima By John Hersey
    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summer Assignment Guided Questions: Hiroshima By John Hersey

    The views on the bomb, were that it was not the right thing to do, because it killed a lot of people and they had to suffer much more then others, in some cases people were suffering from the radiation, and also people were dying from the fires that were caused by the bomb…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb
    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Truman's Decision To Prevent The Atomic Bombing
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Truman's Decision To Prevent The Atomic Bombing

    The money that was involved in the creation of the atomic bomb was tremendous. It was massive, if it wasn’t experimented on then it was believed that the Americans would be highly disappointed. After the Japanese attack, President Truman took that as a great opportunity to use the bombing. The outcome was successful because it caused an atrocious amount of deaths in…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Truman's Decision To Drop Of The Atomic Bomb Justified
    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page

    Was Truman's Decision To Drop Of The Atomic Bomb Justified

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    The atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used in World War 2 to defeat Japan. America could have used other alternatives then the deadly atomic bomb. President Truman should of waited a few more weeks for russia to declare war on Japan. The thought of invasion by both of America and Russia probably had an even more scared effect on the Japanese government then the Atomic Bombs. America could of also continue the conventional bombings and blockade.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Harry S. Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb
    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Harry S. Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

    Harry S. Truman was a simple man from Missouri who, in his own words, stated “if ever there was a man forced to be President, I am that man” (Ferrell, 1980). During the 1944 election, the Democratic Party nominated Truman for the Vice Presidency against his wishes. His loyalty to the Party ran deep, however, so he humbly accepted and became Franklin Roosevelt’s running mate. It was no surprise when Roosevelt won his fourth term, but many people had never heard of Harry Truman. This was about to change. In April 1945, only 82 days into Truman’s Vice Presidency, he received word that President Roosevelt died. He now found himself President of a nation in the midst of World War II.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Pearl Harbor Bombing
    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Pearl Harbor Bombing

    The bomb caused great destruction to thousands of innocent lives. The bomb created a whole other problem, that could’ve been substituted with another weapon, that not as deadly. Bombs came with pros and cons, the bombs meant for people and those who have nothing to do with any incident. Overall the bombs were pure cruel.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing

    The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    American Involvement In Ww2 Essay
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    American Involvement In Ww2 Essay

    Firstly, the bombs saved more lives than it claimed. To illustrate, many American and Japanese lives would have been lost in the battles to capture Japan. Similar to the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, the Japanese would never surrender until all of their forces were lost, and this would result in a copious amount of death and despair. The Allied generals estimated over a 1,000,000 lives would have been lost in the upcoming battles if Truman did not decide to end the war with the atomic bombs. Additionally, the Japanese threatened to execute 100,000 Allied prisoners of war if they decided to invade the Japanese mainlands. Thus, by dropping the atomic bombs, many lives, including both Japanese and American, have been saved by bringing the war to an abrupt stop. Furthermore, the Japanese were given a fair warning before the Allies dropped the Atomic bombs. On July 26, a few days before the dropping of the bombs, President Truman issued a final ultimatum for the Japanese forces to surrender or be bombed. Yet, Emperor Hirohito declared that he would not surrender. On account of Emperor Hirohito not surrendering, Truman decided to drop the Atomic Bombs to end the war quickly. Hence, the Japanese were given a choice to surrender or to be bombed, but they chose to be bombed. Although many argue that the Atomic Bombs were not justified because they…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons
    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons

    The atomic bomb dropped on Japan was the correlated decision of the president at the time, Harry Truman, and his chief advisors. While the pros and cons were weighed heavily, it was decided that the least blood shed would be wrought if we shed the most blood on the first strike. On August 6, 1945, the enola gay, a class B-29 heavy bomber, departed from Tinian, an island to the southeast of Japan, carrying a heavy payload which would effectively be the beginning of the end of Japan’s war against the United States. The payload at hand would be called “Little boy”, a Uranium comprised atomic bomb created for the simple purpose of mass destruction. The target of this weapon would be a bridge formed at a junction between two rivers in the downtown…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    One reason the dropping of the atomic bomb was the right thing to do because it saved many more lives. It was estimated that millions of american soldiers lives’ were saved. If the bomb was not dropped then the United States would have lost millions of the young…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay

    The politicians in power when this traumatic event occurred could have agreed to a different course of action instead of dropping an atomic bomb to Hiroshima. Therefore, instead of thinking about the long-term effects and coming up with a reasonable solution to end the war, the politicians in power chose the easy route. Bomb! Particularly,…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb
    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page

    President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

    President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb was a difficult decision for one man to make. However, before he could ever make that difficult decision he first had to be told the weapon was even an option. The atomic bomb was a closely guarded secret that only a select few even at the highest levels in the government had knowledge of. So when the decision was made to use the bomb it was made to save the lives of not only American servicemen but those of the Japanese empire as well. That faithful decision did take the lives of many civilians of Japan but it also saved more that it ever took. President Truman sacrificed a few to save the many which is extremely hard to accept when the majority of those killed were civilians of all ages…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Essay
    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Essay

    “We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man” stated Leaflet B dropped on August 6th, 1945. Since the United States knew how destructive the bomb was, they should have not used it in the first place. Not only was japan in danger but Leo Szilard and 69 co-signers at the Manhattan Project stated “ the cities of the United States as well as the cities of other nations will be in continuous danger of sudden annihilation.” Most people working on the project for two and a half years did not even know what they were working on or hiding from the American public. Though, Japan killed and injured many Americans, the U.S. killed more people and left Japan with high levels of radiation for many years after the bomb was dropped. In conclusion, the United States was not in any way justified for the decision of dropping the atomic…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop the atomic bomb
    • 1235 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The decision to drop the atomic bomb

    In the summer of 1945 the United States was entering the final stages of World War II. One could assume that ending the war quickly was a priority. President Truman was demanding “unconditional surrender” from Japan. In a statement he released on May 8th, he described unconditional surrender as “Our blows will not cease until the Japanese military and naval forces lay down their arms in unconditional surrender. Just what does the unconditional surrender of the armed forces mean for the Japanese people? It means the end of the war. It means the termination of the influence of the military leaders who have brought Japan to the present brink of disaster.… Unconditional surrender does not mean the extermination or enslavement of the Japanese people. (Alperovitz, Gar (2010-12-29). The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb (p. 39).)” So if the war were to end the Japanese would have to unconditionally surrender, secretary of state James Byrnes said as much, “For instance, in his 1947 book Speaking Frankly, James F. Byrnes declared without qualification: “Had the Japanese Government listened to [Ambassador to Soviet Union] Sato and surrendered unconditionally, it would not have been necessary to drop the atomic bomb. (Alperovitz, p. 34)” The Japanese refused to surrender because of the terms they would be conceding to. They wanted a guarantee that their emperor would be protected and they felt unconditional surrender would put him in jeopardy. “The reality is that as the summer of 1945 progressed, most U.S. leaders fully realized that the only serious condition Japan’s leaders sought was an assurance that the Emperor would not be eliminated. (Alperovitz, p.34)” One could conclude that the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of Japan’s refusal to unconditionally surrender. There is also belief that the atomic bomb was dropped to intimidate the Soviet Union. As historian Barton Berstein put it, “The combat use…

    • 1235 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics