Preview

Rousseau and the U.S. Government

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rousseau and the U.S. Government
Remnants of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's beliefs in human rights, government elected by the masses, and the limited governmental control of the masses can be compared to the methodology of the democratic republic that governs the United States. Rousseau believed above all else that people's rights were of most importance. He stated the people are born free into a world that puts them in chains, restricting their rights from birth. The U.S. government was built on the grounds of combating oppression of citizens so as they may live and believe as they wish. Such a governmental concept was unheard of in the European nations until Great Britain introduced the parliamentary system, thus giving birth to limited monarchy. To keep the government working towards the general good of the people, Rousseau believed that any governing body should be elected by the individuals of a nation. In the American republic, mayors, senators, even the President, are elected by the citizens. In this fashion, the general good is put before individual interests. Rousseau had faith that people were generally good, but became corrupted by the evils of society. In that respect, he believed that the government should have limited control over the citizens to whom it served. In today's United States government, documents such as the Constitution and its Bill of Rights assist in keeping the government's influence over the lives of citizens minimal. Such documents guarantee citizens certain liberties under which they are able to live to the maximum degree of freedom. The United States government does, however, control many economic aspects of the country. The Constitution protects the economic rights of people by allowing for free enterprise so individuals may work and earn income as they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For the past many years, people have been trying to figure out the relationship between the government and nature of man. The theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau about the connection between nature of man and the government have been debated for many years. These three philosophers have remarkably influenced the way our system works today. Although each theory had its flaws and merits, Jean Jacques Rousseau’s theory is superior in comparison to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau made a distinction of natural liberty, civil liberty, and moral liberty. This is basically his classification of various categories of freedom. Natural liberty is the most basic and thrives in the state of nature, in natural liberty, man has unlimited freedom and right to anything he/she desires and is capable of attaining. Civil liberty is gained upon entry into a civil society through a social contract. Men give up the natural liberty which is less secure in exchange for civil liberty which is secured collectively. Rousseau, however, believes that the loss of natural liberty is a fundamental loss…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau says, “no man has natural authority over his fellows, and since Might can produce no Right, the only foundation left for legitimate authority in human societies is Agreement” (60). Therefore, readers can understand that there is no natural slave or ruler, and it is people who select their rulers after they have had “agreements” with their rulers. On the other hand, Jefferson writes, “that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (78). At this passage, Jefferson explains that governments are established by people who are “governed” based on their agreements with the governments. Moreover, he adds, “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness” (78). At this point, Jefferson has expanded Rousseau’s ideas and states clearly that once the “agreements” between the people and rulers are broken, the rulers can be overthrown, and people have rights to select a new ruler. Jefferson later supports his expansion by presenting…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau added to the idea of democracy by creating the idea that people are born good but can be corrupted by society, therefore they need to make the laws themselves and willingly obey them. He believed that if left to itself, society would follow these equally created laws and society would maintain its naturally born goodness. He believes that only the general society is capable enough to run themselves with laws created by the people for the people. Much of these ideas are still around today combined with other ideas in our own…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Locke, the purpose of a government is to help people achieve equal natural rights. The government is obligated to defend and protect its citizens. However, the government must rule with the consent of the people. Also if the citizens have given their voluntary consent, they must support and obey a government that has claimed power. The citizens are obliged to obey the government if it has established legitimacy. However, one cannot be obligated to obey the government unless one has…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Declaration of Independence was a revolutionary piece of writing that impacted the whole world for decades after it was written, by starting a chain of angry citizens overthrowing unjust governments. But the elements that made it so different and revolutionary were not thought up all at the time; many of the ideas put into the Declaration had been envisioned by a wide variety of thinkers during the Enlightenment. The Declaration of Independence reflects many aspects of Enlightenment philosophy. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, for example, believed a direct democracy was the best government because it protected people’s rights. He felt that a government’s power was granted by the citizens who lived under it. The Declaration uses this notion several times, including in the quote, “governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”. Another philosopher who contributed to the ideas in the Declaration of Independence was John Locke. He was the first to consider the idea of natural rights. He believed every person was entitled to life, liberty and property. The Declaration of Independence uses this idea that every person is endowed “with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”, as a main argument, because they felt that colonists, citizens of a colony of England, were not given these rights, or even the same rights as citizens of England. Also John Locke believed that unfair governments should be overthrown, and that it was the responsibility of the citizens to rebel if the government wasn’t protecting the rights of the people. The Declaration echoes this several times to justify their unhappiness with British rule. Clearly, the Enlightenment thinkers played a large role in the development of the ideas in the Declaration of Independence and in the American…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the present political spectrum, democracy is essentially understood as both the most humane and effective means by which to govern a body politic. While democracy is currently relatively non-controversial, this was not the case during its establishment. The democratic experiment in America was viewed somewhat indifferently by many of the world's prominent political philosophers. Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill existed among those most apprehensive of the democratic experiment. To each of these men, democracy certainly possessed certain positive attributes, but at the same time, represented a potential threat to the individual freedoms of man, through a much feared 'tyranny of the majority'.…

    • 982 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau states in his Social Contract “democracy is for gods, not men.” He considers the assembly of the whole citizen body a too euphoric and utopian arrangement for men to take on. Once the boys make up order and start making decisions democratically, they are setting themselves up for failure. The quote “The bright morning was full of threats and the circle began to change. It faced out rather than in,” suggests that the ‘circle’ represents unity and…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When one thinks about the major historical documents that have shaped a country or a religion throughout history such as The United States Constitution or The Ten Commandments, an impersonal image of (In this case) words on paper or words on a stone tablet pops into mind. The reader rarely takes the time to analyze the rigorous process behind the creation of the laws and rules that encompass their everyday lives, be it in the United States or in any other country in the world. The creation and execution of laws are two individual processes that ultimately come together as they are being indoctrinated into a singular society, country or state. In Rousseau’s The Social Contract, he contrasts both aspects of law-making and law-executing, more…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau influenced many people in the eighteenth century, including Robespierre and Maria Montessori. With his strong say in social inequality and dysfunctional democracy, he not only managed to impact the life of leaders and other famous philosophes during the French Revolution, but also help shape the world we live in today. Rousseau believed in a Direct Democracy, meaning that everyone has the right to an individual vote. In other words, he strongly influenced the development of the Liberal, Conservative, and Socialist theory. Likewise, today in Canada, we have individual voting for everyone above the age of eighteen. In addition, Rousseau also influenced movements for political reforms and revolutions in Europe. His “Social Contract,” stating that everyone is equal and good by nature, but corrupted by society, caused an uproar. The contract also argued against the idea that monarchs were empowered to legislate. However, Rousseau developed theories that some, or even all people would govern.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1700's, ideas of the Enlightenment began to come into affect. In North America, the American government started to form after two famous documents were finished, The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the United States. The Political and Social ideas of Rousseau and Baccaria from the Enlightenment are replicated in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. The Declaration was used to declare independence, and the Constitution was written to limit the powers of government.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without a belief that political efficacy is strong, and each citizen making a personal input into society, it is the belief of both Rousseau and myself that “the State is not far from its fall.” Faith and activity in the political system has been replaced with financial activity. Rousseau states that, “In a country that is truly free, the citizens do everything with their own arms and nothing by means of money; so far from paying to be exempted from their duties, they would even pay for the privilege of fulfilling them themselves.” If people so desire to make their input to society purely financial, perhaps they should be punished financially for not being politically active.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rousseau believed that in order for a society to be justified it must 'best affirm the individual freedom of all citizens'. In Rousseau's theory of a state of nature, he claims that human beings were once able to live 'uncorrupted by society' and could essentially do as they wished. Within all states of nature, when conflicts being to arise each society needs some form of structured government to offer protection and security. For this theory to be successful, each individual must relinquish a portion of their freedom for choice in order to gain protection and maintain physical freedom within their society. Rousseau believed in a 'collective will' theory where the people are represented by a 'sovereign' who expresses the general will that aims for the common good. The sovereign is not one singular person although they defend the rights and desires of individuals. However, Plato believed that the theory of giving the people the choice over the actions of their society cannot be successful as it is assumes that they have the ability to determine what is the best decision. By assuming this one is not considering that when making a decision, people are often…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He concluded that without freedom one cannot trust another, and form alliances ; without this ability Rousseau believes humans would perish. Additionally, Rousseau thinks there should be a democratic government. Such as the social contract,…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Answer: Can individuals delegate their legislative power in Rousseau’s philosophy? Critically evaluate the relationship of individuals to the sovereign.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays