The century-old SATs have developed somewhat of a formula from the start of their creation. Some students have dissected this formula, even for means of profit. Security in SAT facilities is minimal as well; it has been proven easy to simply walk in and take the test for another person. This is the case for high-school student Sam Eshaghoff, who mastered the technique of acing the SATs. Eshaghoff took the test a total of 16 times for other students, gaining a profit of over 25,000 dollars. He achieved a perfect score almost every time he took the exam. A prestigious test that can be cheated on so easily should not be at the forefront of educational success. Eshaghoff was eventually caught, but the students he cheated for could not be reported. Most of his clients were accepted into elite schools that they do not deserve to be in. Eshaghoff’s plan was an immoral scheme; however, SAT supporters argue that the number of successful cheating attempts compared to the number of legitimate attempts makes the cheating negligible. On the other hand, having the ability to cheat on a such a life-changing exam exemplifies the uselessness of the
The century-old SATs have developed somewhat of a formula from the start of their creation. Some students have dissected this formula, even for means of profit. Security in SAT facilities is minimal as well; it has been proven easy to simply walk in and take the test for another person. This is the case for high-school student Sam Eshaghoff, who mastered the technique of acing the SATs. Eshaghoff took the test a total of 16 times for other students, gaining a profit of over 25,000 dollars. He achieved a perfect score almost every time he took the exam. A prestigious test that can be cheated on so easily should not be at the forefront of educational success. Eshaghoff was eventually caught, but the students he cheated for could not be reported. Most of his clients were accepted into elite schools that they do not deserve to be in. Eshaghoff’s plan was an immoral scheme; however, SAT supporters argue that the number of successful cheating attempts compared to the number of legitimate attempts makes the cheating negligible. On the other hand, having the ability to cheat on a such a life-changing exam exemplifies the uselessness of the