It starts by stating that the world of politics is encountering a new status, the world will change and the reason behind the change is the cultural difference. He defines civilization as “cultural entity,” (“The clash of civilization”, Huntington, 23), and then he uses it to talk about Europe: he said that Europeans will still have common similarities but their culture won’t be the same. He says that “the cultural elements of every nation is the language, history, religion, customs, institutions and by the self-identification of a person” (24) Huntington later on lists the reasons why the civilizations will clash and it is because of the division of world into “Seven or Eight major civilization” (25), which is not completely true because every person has his own identity and perspective of viewing religion, history, and politics. For example, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant “ISIS” attacks on the Shiite Muslims is not accepted by the Sunni Muslims, which shows that Muslims cannot all be defined as an Islamic civilization, while he claims it is the “the highest cultural grouping”…
Rourke, John T. Taking Sides: Clashing Views in World Politics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2014. Print.…
6. Betts argues that three theoreticians offered models of the future that sought to explain the driving forces of world politics after the twentieth century, the century of warfare. (1 point)…
Crucible of Civilization is an occurrence, under pressure that causes changes or progression. In regards to the Crucible civilization, The Greeks deserve the name. Look back at many civilizations we’ve studied, The Greeks are unique. The Greeks changed the world. Just like many other civilizations, The Greeks experienced trials and tribulations. Next month, the Olympics Games will be held in Brazil. This is one of the many legacies that make people refer to the Greeks, as Crucible of Civilization. Although countries may have rift among them, yet during the international Olympics countries compete against each order in the spirit of sportsmanship. In fact, the word Olympics originates from ancient Greek.…
ways that these conflicts eventually end. As we explore these issues, we will also acquire indepth historical knowledge of the history of terrorism and insurgency in general and of a wide…
“What the map tells us about coming conflicts and the battle against fate.” The author, Robert D. Kaplan traces the history of the world’s hotspots by examining their climates, topographies, and proximities to other embattled lands. He then utilizes the teachings learned to the tragic, present day occurrences in Europe, Russia, China, the Indian Subcontinent, Turkey, Iran, and the Arab Middle East. The result is a complete understanding of the next cycle of conflict throughout Eurasia, an ambitious look into what will become of the future which can only be understood in the context of temperature, land allotment, and other physical certainties.…
Huntington, S., 2002. The Clash of Civilizations? The Next Pattern of Conflict" International Relations: In the Post-Cold War Era. Pp 45-66.…
In his essay, Civilization and Its Discontents, Gary Kamiya writes about the presence of Political Correctness in society. P.C. teaches proper societal conduct and determines social status, which are necessary ethics when promoted within private domains. The principles are encroaching on the public grounds of the university where they should not be advocated. The university exists to promote liberal education by giving free space for analysis and tolerance; it does not exist to dictate proper conduct. This free space results in citizens that can handle real life problems, while P.C. concerns itself with the abstract. When P.C. hinders liberal education, society achieves nothing practical.…
In 2012, the concentrated eruption of disputes in East Asia, the continued conflict between Pakistan and Israel both suggest that the haunting history has been and even is increasingly to be sources of distrust, hatred, and thus conflicts in the world. As the 20th century passed away, the 21st century has brought us a difficult task as how to deal with our tumultuous past. I hope that the world in the new century would be a world that can be at peace with its past---it would not be mired in the historical grievances, but would instead look into possibilities of the future.…
Supporting this issue, Samuel P. Huntington, shows two different considerations of the western civilization in ‘The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order’. The first consideration is the western dominance on the economic, political, cultural and security situation of every other civilization and region. The second consideration depicts its slow decline with the internal problems like slow economic growth, unemployment, stagnant population, government shortfall, deteriorating work ethic, crime, and social collapse.…
In the 5th century, the philosopher Plato insightfully noted, ‘Only the dead have seen the end of war,” with history showing this to be true. People have continued to engage in all manner of conflicts, be they petty arguments or large-scale confrontations from which valuable lessons have been learnt about human nature and the present. History has revealed the flaws and primitive nature of people irrespective of the mistaken belief that progress has led to civilisation and order. Past conflicts teach that individuals, communities and even nations do not learn from past mistakes but continue to repeat them and that despite eventually being resolved, the effects have the ability to linger and haunt subsequent generations. History also teaches that conflict invariably occurs when people or nations act for self-interest and personal gain, or and when uncompromising authorities exploit their absolute power over citizens to ensure their authority remains unquestioned. Also by understanding the causes of past conflicts, individuals may reflect on their own behaviours and hopefully prevent them from occurring in the present, or if they do, provide a guide as to how to best minimise the damage they cause by knowing how to resolve them quickly and equitably before they spread beyond the main combatants which they invariably do.…
In every part of life there have been various disputes involving religion, culture, gender, class, and ethnicity that has created an endless conflict of war. And why is this? It all has to deal with human variability. It is this, in which causes such arguments take affect and create barriers between others. Communication is the only resolution to conflict; yet many argue that ignorance is the occurrence of conflict evolving many factors of tradition, power, and authority that can never be resolved. Conflict is an inevitable part of our lives that is developed through the differences in race and appearance thoughts and opinions, as well as a person’s overall identity.…
According to Hauss, we as a global community, tend to view the political process in win-lose or zero-sum terms. It is because of this way of thinking that leads us to resort to violence as a way to solve disputes rather than talking them out in civil discourse. According to Einstein, we are drifting towards the unparalleled catastrophe of nuclear war. (Hauss, 2012) We continue to break ourselves down into groups normally based along nationality, religion, social status, and other categories instead of just being human. As we break ourselves up into these groupings, we tend to take upon ourselves a different identity instead of one common identity. With these different identities are different values and beliefs, which may not mesh with another group’s identity. This can and normally does lead to differences of opinions between groups, making it difficult, if not nearly impossible to find a common denominator.…
Ellingsen, T. (2005). Toward a Revival of Religion and Religious Clashes? Terrorism and Political Violence. Retrieved July 30, 2009, from EBSCOhost doi: 10.1080/09546550590929192. (University Library).…
Huntington believed that conflict would take place at both micro and macro levels. At a micro level (within civilizations) there would be struggle over borders and territories, he said that groups would clash ‘like tectonic plates’. By this he meant that the tension between groups either side of borders would slowly build until somewhere the tension would lead to a rupture or a clash in this case. On a macro level global conflict driven buy core states on each side trying to dominate one another through their control of global institutions would drive the conflict. Huntingdon argued that due to the fact groups within the world had so many beliefs and traditions that conflict was inevitable as groups would never be able to agree on everything. He imagined the three key conflicts would be the East v West, West v China and the ‘West v the rest’. Many would argue that there has been an large increase in the clash of civilizations in recent years, this notion is likely to have developed from the major terrorist attacks that we have witnessed in the last 2 decades such as 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings as well as an increase in globalization. However one can see that as opposed to an increase in a clash of civilizations there has in fact been a stronger rise in tensions between different groups within borders. In this essay I will investigate the contested areas within the public and tabloid-fuelled debate and speculation to find the reality.…