Preview

Should Force be used if necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1773 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Force be used if necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons?
Should force be used if necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons?
Already Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi had ambitious goals back then: he wanted to build twenty nuclear reactors. But four years after this announcement he made a mistake: he let his responsible official for nuclear energy declare that no nation has the right to determine another nation’s – in this case Iran’s - nuclear policy. He also said that Persia is going to have nuclear weapons, without a doubt and faster than one might think. This aroused suspicion among US president Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter, they were afraid Iran strove after plutonium for the construction of nuclear weapons instead of using it for energy production. But what about the current leader of Iran, Hassan
Rouhani? What is his goal? What does he pursue with his atomic program, and is it really as peaceful as he says? I am going to take a look at Iran’s nuclear program, its development over the past years and try to give a suggestion about how the international community should proceed in this conflict.
First off, I will not be able to decide whether or not force should be used to prevent Iran from acquiring, testing or using nuclear weapons. This decision cannot be made based on the information I use and analyze in this paper because there are many factors more that need to be considered, I probably can’t even think of most of them. Nonetheless I am going to focus on arguments against the use of force against Iran because I support pacifistic solutions in world politics.
Before we even look at the whole nuclear crisis and the reactions from the international community, we need to take a closer look at Iranian politics to understand how and by

1

whom decisions in Iran are made. Even though the U.S. and the Iranian governments seem to have a lot in common, there a big differences between. The most obvious one is that Iran is an Islamic theocracy, led by a “Supreme Leader”, who has ideological and political control



Bibliography: “Council on Foreign Relations”. Council on Foreign Relations, Web. 28 Sept. 2014. Web. 28 Sept. 2014. http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iaeairan/iaea_reports.shtml "Iranindustry.de - country Infos ." Iran Industry.de Country Infos Rourke, John T. Taking Sides: Clashing Views in World Politics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2014. Print. "The Iran Primer." Iran 's Nuclear Program. 28 Sept. 2014. http://iranprimer.usip.org/resource/iransnuclear-program "The Iran Primer." The Politics of Iran 's Nuclear Program

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My partner and I stand in negation of the resolution, “Resolved: unilateral military force is justified by the United States to prevent nuclear proliferation” for three reasons. First, interfering with foreign affairs using military force gives many countries all the more reason to undergo nuclear proliferation. Second, the fact that military force by the U.S. is unilateral, many countries are in disfavor of it and finally, preventing nuclear proliferation is too great for the U.S. alone to handle.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Counseling Arab Americans

    • 3406 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Keddie, N. (2003). Modern Iran: Roots and results of revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.…

    • 3406 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Until children begin learning how to make their own decisions, they have a tendency to adopt their parents view on most topics. The funny thing is that most adults adopt other people’s views on politics and other matters because they are ignorant on the subject. Rather than educate themselves and formulate their own opinions, they listen to the people around them and simply agree. At the beginning of this assignment I did not feel I had enough knowledge about Iran to write a full paper about the subject. I have very general knowledge about the country. My first thoughts were religious extremism, oil, and links to terrorist groups. They say that ignorance is bliss and I can honestly say that I am guilty of being ignorant.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As some of us know, the topic on whether the United States should enter Iran has been a question our country has been asking itself for some time now. The war has been going on for many years now and many people have had enough of it. This is partially the main reason why our country cannot decide whether or not to invade Iran. After reading a few articles on this topic I have come to realize that by invading Iran, we will help not just the United States, but many other countries as well. We all know how big Iran is into terrorism. After 9/11, I personally would like to invade Iran and shut down everything they have. By invading Iran the United States can shut down some of the big terrorist groups and help our country as well as other countries from future terrorist attacks. By taking out these groups many countries would feel safer and won’t have to worry about being attacked every day. Terrorism is being seen more frequently and it’s something that needs to be stopped. My next point on why the United States should invade Iran is to stop their nuclear programs. Just one nuclear bomb can destroy and small country and wreak destruction and havoc on a larger country. The United States would benefit greatly along with many other countries if we were to invade and eliminate Iran’s nuclear facilities. We can clearly see that Iran doesn’t see eye to eye with the United States. By invading and taking out their strong point (nuclear programs), we could earn much needed respect and possibly end years of history with these countries. I feel that Iran doesn’t know the damage in which they can do with nuclear weapons. The power of these weapons can cause severe damage to any country. By invading Iran, the United States can end things for good and help our country get back on the right path. The next reason why should invade Iran is our economic issue we are facing. As we all know, war is a very costly incident for a…

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Iranian revolution of 1979 refers to the overthrowing of the last king of Iran. It was an Islamic revolution which attempted to replace Mohammed Reza Shah, with an Islamic republic under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution. Strong opposition against the Shah showed that the people wanted a religious ruler rather than someone they saw as an American puppet. Many Iranian people would think that the Shah was a ‘capitalist pig’ who ran a corrupt and repressive regime but tried to embrace western style democracy. In saying this, Iran was a very developed and modern nation during the Shah’s reign where students were educated together and westernization took over. The Shah, who was supported by many western powers, ruled Iran like a dictatorship. He oppressed his people, many of which were illiterate, and kept most of them in poverty which made him very unpopular. The people of Iran were living in an oil rich country, and yet poverty was not uncommon. They enjoyed freedoms unheard of in Saudi Arabia, yet were kept under the brutal force of the secret police, the Savak. On the other hand when Khomeini took over the government was a theocracy and ended all progression in Iran and forced his Islamic rules on the people. Iran became a completely different nation after Khomeini took power losing all its foreign industry and development. Khomeini believed that Iran was losing its origins and history to Americanization. He ruled using the Quran, the Islamic holy book. This meant new Islamic laws were imposed on people, a new dress code was coerced on woman while men had more freedoms displaying patriarchy in society. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press were ostensibly protected, at least as long as it did not contradict Islamic law. He expelled all other influences whereas the shah agreed with capitalism and modernization on the culture and economy. This caused Khomeini to cut off western influence…

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Paella

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Iran is continuing to produce enriched uranium, a program that the Tehran government has said is intended for civilian purposes. The new estimate says that the enrichment program could still provide Iran with enough raw material to produce a nuclear weapon sometime by the middle of next decade, a timetable essentially unchanged from previous estimates.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those states most actively working to develop weapons of mass destruction is for the most part located in unstable regions of the world – the Middle East, South Asia, and the Korean Peninsula. The greatest threat posed by these states is to their neighbors and to regional stability. Proliferation poses dangers to all nations. It poses particular problems for the United States. The breakup of the Soviet Union presented immediate threats to the global non-proliferation regimes. Dr. Peter Clausen’s thesis is “that America has opposed the spread of nuclear weapons, not as a moral or humanitarian imperative but out of hard-headed calculations of interest,” (Clausen, 1993). While the United States and other countries want to stop the spread of nuclear proliferation, it will never become a reality and effective unless all the nations who have nuclear capabilities give up their programs themselves for a greater world order and peace without the threats of…

    • 4748 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran’s development of nuclear weaponry is a threat to Israel and therefore the United States. Israel must take all precautionary measures to prevent Iran from finishing its nuclear program and this includes military action. If something were not done to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, then the US would be pulled into a gruesome war with nuclear weapons.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran Nuclear Conflict

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2009 the IAEA said that Iran had failed to provide sufficient Information. When Obama was elected in 2008, he wanted to negotiate terms for Iran to stop their nuclear program. Which has led until recently where all the country ambassadors were meeting in Geneva. They were trying to settle an agreement before the end of negotiations. If Iran is to hold their nuclear program they will lose all of their trade and bargaining with allied countries.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Iranian Nuclear Program

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the recent years, we have seen a big movement in the Middle East that has made headlines all over the world. Whether it be Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia or Libya forcing their leaders out of power in the hopes of a better democracy; to the war currently happening in Syria, the Middle East has had nothing but important and world changing events happening. However, to some, not all of these events might seem so great or safe on a regional and global scale. The current events happening in Iran, such as the nuclear research program, are to some a great threat to the world and nearby Arad countries. Iran has been a big talk in the U.N. on many subjects but I will be focusing on the Nuclear Program that is currently being researched in Iran. There are many different opinions on the subject, but I believe that Iran should be allowed to develop their nuclear program but under strict surveillance from the United Nations, Security Council and the IAEA. Iran is a sovereign state, but it is still a member of the United Nations and is bound to certain treaties or inter-governmental organisations. Also, it has been accused of supporting terrorist group, therefore it is in a great position to state that it will not use it towards supporting terrorists or maybe even using nuclear weapons towards Israel.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Nuclear Iran

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Iran, a relatively large third world regime bordering multiple Middle Eastern countries, has for many years been accused of secretly building nuclear weapons. This is a country with extreme radical ideologies that publicly condemns the west and sends weekly threats of annihilation to Israel. Countries around the world are slowly showing their anxiety of such a nation potentially possessing capabilities of immense means of destruction when their ideologies and past actions suggest such aggressive behaviours. Yet there is no proof to say that Iran does in fact own any nuclear weapons, and they have repeatedly expressed that their nuclear facilities are purely for peaceful and technological purposes. First in this paper I will summarize the argument against the possibility of a nuclear Iran. Second, I will do the opposite and summarize the reasoning for the possibility of a nuclear Iran. Finally, I will conclude with the argument that the world can exist with a nuclear Iran.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran Nuclear Program

    • 2130 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Sanctions on Iran: Defining and enabling ‘success’” By Dina Esfandiary and Mark Fitzpatrick, Routledge (March 25th, 2012)…

    • 2130 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Excerpt from “India’s Nuclear Policy” (Oct 2012) in Pakistan Defence: Web’s authoritative source on Pakistan Defence and Strategic Affairs. http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence/179316-indias-nuclearpolicy.html…

    • 3536 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FULLY AWARE OF THE UNITED NATION’S EFFORTS AGAINST NUCLEAR WEAPONRY AND WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, EGYPT JOINED THE NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY IN 1980 AND HAS SINCE MAINTAINED THE GUIDELINES OF THE TREATY. ALMOST THE WHOLE OF THE MIDDLE EASTERN REGION IS NUCLEAR WEAPON FREE EXCEPT ISRAEL AND PAKISTAN. EGYPT HAS CALLED FOR PRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONRY TO BE STOPPED. ISRAEL HOWEVER REFUSES TO ABANDON IT’S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS. IRAQ IS NOW SHOWING INTEREST IN DEVELOPING NUCLEAR WEAPONRY MUCH TO THE THE DISAPPROVAL OF EGYPT AND HER PEOPLE. RECALLING THE EFFECTS OF THE HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI BOMBINGS, THE CHERNOBYL DISASTER AND MORE RECENTLY THE FUKUSHIMA DISASTER IN JAPAN, EGYPT BELIEVES THAT NUCLEAR POWER IF USED FOR VIOLENCE AND HANDLED IMPROPERLY CAN HAVE DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES. EGYPT BELIEVES THAT STRONGER LAWS AGAINST PRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS, SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE IN THE PRICE OF MATERIALS USED FOR MANUFACTURE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS, CONSTANT CHECK ON THE NUCLEAR WEAPON BLACK MARKET IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND CO-OPERATION OF EACH AND EVERY COUNTRY RECOGNISED BY THE UN WILL HELP IN DISARMAMENT. EGYPT ALSO BELIEVES THAT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY SET ASIDE BY COUNTRIES DEDICATED TO THE PURCHASE OF ARMS SHOULD BE REDUCED TO HELP IN DISARMAMENT. IF THE ARMS RACE GOES UNCHECKED THE WORLD STANDS AT A RISK OF ANOTHER WORLD WAR. DUE TO THE ARMS RACE SMALLER DEVELOPING COUNTRIES SET ASIDE MORE AND MORE MONEY DEDICATED TO MANUFACTURING AND PURCHASING WEAPONRY AT THE COST OF PUBLIC HEALTH,SANITATION AND EDUCATION FUNDS. THE ISSUE OF DISARMAMENT IS SERIOUS AND MUST NOT BE TAKEN LIGHTLY.THE ISSUE OF DISARMAMENT MAY BE ADDED EITHER TO THE NPT OR THE ARMS TRADE TREATY…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    crimea

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    nuclear and missile programs are a source of instability and tension in a region vital to global…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays