Preview

Science and the Bible Are Contradictory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
14026 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Science and the Bible Are Contradictory
Science and the Bible
Dr. James R. Adair
Origins of the Conflict
Ever since the end of the Middle Ages (which coincides with the beginning of the Protestant Reformation in the early 16th century), some Christians have had problems accepting the teachings of science. The origins of modern scientific thought go back to the Renaissance, when people rediscovered the teachings, art, and thought of the ancient Greeks and, of equal importance, began to see the importance of thinking for themselves, outside the restrictions of external authority structures.
The first major figure whose scientific views conflicted with the official position of the church was Nicolaus Copernicus, who published an anonymous work claiming that the sun, not the earth, was the center of the solar system. (The traditional, earth-centered view was associated with a second-century Egyptian natural philosopher named Ptolemy.) Copernicus died (1543) before his work was widely enough known, or widely enough associated with him, to cause him personal problems. However, his book On the Revolution of the Celestial Spheres was added to the Index of Forbidden Books maintained by the Roman Catholic Church, and Christians were forbidden to read it.
Galileo Galilei built telescopes and began looking through them at the heavens. He was familiar with the work of Copernicus, and his own studies confirmed the heliocentric (sun-centered) view of the solar system. However, in 1616 he was forbidden from teaching the truth of the Copernican view, though he was allowed to teach it as a hypothesis. In 1632 Galileo published a book called Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems (i.e., those of Ptolemy and Copernicus). Although the title of the book made it sound as though the two views would be treated as having equal validity, it is clear that Galileo favored the Copernican view. Galileo was forced by the church to recant his beliefs, and his Dialogue was added to the Index. Galileo himself remained under house



Cited: Brand, L. R.  1985.  Can science and religion work together?  Origins 12:71-88.   ____,  1997.  Faith, Reason, and Earth History.  Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University Press.    ____.  1984.  Lyell 's vision and rhetoric.  In: Berggren, W   ____.  1999.  Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life.  Ballantine Books.   ____.  1980b.  Understanding the Living Word of God.  Mountain View, CA: Pacific Press.   Lyell, C.  1830-1833.  Principles of Geology, Being an Attempt to Explain the Former Changes of the Earth 's Surface, by Reference to Causes Now in Operation.  3 vols.  John Murray, London.   ____.  1995.  Reason in the Balance: the Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law & Education.  Downer 's Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.   ____, ed.  1994.  The Creation Hypothesis.  Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. Origins.  Published by Geoscience Research Institute, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350.  Usually two issues per year, 1974 - present.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Glg101 Syllabus

    • 2330 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Course Description This course gives an overview of physical geology by introducing concepts such as plate tectonics and geologic time. Students gain familiarity with the processes that shape the Earth’s surface and recognize the relevance of studying geology. Topics include the rock cycle, weathering, formation of geological features, and preservation of geological resources. The weekly labs add a practical component to the class. The labs build upon the concepts in the text and offer a chance to interact with the material and further their understanding. Policies Faculty and students/learners will be held responsible for understanding and adhering to all policies contained within the following two documents: University policies: You must be logged into the student website to view this document. Instructor policies: This document is posted in the Course Materials forum. University policies are subject to change. Be sure to read the policies at the beginning of each class. Policies may be slightly different depending on the modality in which you attend class. If you have recently changed modalities, read the policies governing your current class modality. Course Materials Murck, B. W., Skinner, B. J., & Mackenzie, D. (2010). Visualizing geology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Freeman, T. (2009). Geoscience laboratory (5th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. All electronic materials are available on the student website.…

    • 2330 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Copernican Theory is a theory that was developed by Nicolaus Copernicus that stated that the Sun was positioned near the center of the Universe and that the planets rotated around it. Supporting the Copernican Theory, Galileo wrote a letter to a student that went to the university that he once had taught at, stating that the Copernican theory did not go against the passages in the bible. The letter to the student was made public, and the Catholic church saw it. In 1616, the church demanded that Galileo would not be allowed to “hold, teach or defend the Copernican theory in any matter”. Galileo ended up obeying the church and did not touch or teach about the theory for seven…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pdfs

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People didn't want their children learning about science bc it would mean that the bible is wrong…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Galileo and Copernicus were two extremely influential astronomers. They believed in the heliocentric model of our solar system, or the idea that the planets revolved around the Sun. We all accept this model today as fact, but back in their time, the thought of it was pure blasphemy. The widely accepted idea at the time, as supported by the almighty Catholic Church, was the geocentric model. In this model, the Earth is central to nearly everything, and is orbited by the Sun, moon, and other special bodies. This idea has been discredited, as it is simply untrue. Back then, you either accepted it, or were a rebel of society. Copernicus was well aware of the consequences, and waited until soon before his death to release his theory of the heliocentric…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Galileo Galilei

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The scientist studied the heliocentric model and the planets movements for months. He saw that Venus had phases like the moon, so he thought it must go around the sun. The Church thought it was ridiculous and banned Copernicus’s idea. If anyone defended that idea, they were accused of heresy. Galileo published a dialogue that contained Copernicus’s ideas, and he was summoned to the Inquisition. The dialogue was banned and put in the Index of prohibited books, and Galileo was put under house arrest. Galileo had also looked back at his works about the physics of motion.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christianity Of Religion

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the case of Christianity, a relevant factor may be that it was among Christians that science in the modern sense was developed. Unlike other religious groups, as early as the 17th century the Christian churches had to deal directly with this new way to investigate nature and seek truth. The perceived conflict between science and Christianity may also be partially explained by a literal interpretation of the Bible adhered to by many Christians, both currently and historically. This way to read the sacred texts became especially prevalent after the rise of the Protestant reformation, with its emphasis on the Bible as the only authoritative source concerning the ultimate reality.[34] This view is often shunned by both religious leaders (who regard literally believing it as petty and look for greater meaning instead) and scientists who regard it as an…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sdfwef

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Church opposed this scientific change not because it had a biblical position but because it defended an Aristotelian system of science that stated that the Earth was the centre of the universe. Galileo and others believed that science…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Karst Landscapes

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Christopherson, R. (2012) Geosystems - An Introduction to Physical Geography. 8th ed. United States: Prentice Hall, p.380-385.…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass Wasting

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lutgens, F., Tarbuck, E., & Tasa, D. (2011). Foundations of Earth Science. Upper Saddle River: Prentice.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ka-Loko Dam Failure Essay

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages

    West, Terry R. (2010). Geology Applied to Engineering. New Jersey: Waveland Press Inc. p. 202-544.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Origin of Earth

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Tarbuck, Edward, and Fredrick Lutgens. Earth and Introduction to Physical Geology. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Edu. 2008. Print.…

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Geology

    • 5013 Words
    • 19 Pages

    aims to develop an understanding of the earth’s materials and how these materials were changed and modified through the action of natural forces over a period of time…

    • 5013 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Entwistle noted that it is important to understand the history of Christianity and science. Galileo made great scientific discoveries, however he was heavily criticized for his findings. The Roman Catholic Church had a hard time understanding scientific method. Overall the Roman Catholic Church deserted the fact Christianity had a part in the development of scientific understanding.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As living creatures, the importance of understanding the earth we live in is paramount for our survival and development. Geology is the “scientific study of the origin, history and structure of the earth”. It involves understanding earth’s processes, materials and its effects on all forms of life. From earth elements such as rocks and mountains to natural phenomenon such as volcanoes and earthquakes, the field of geology encompasses a wide range of concepts fundamental to many professions and to civilization in general. Scientific disciplines such as civil engineering and environmental sciences, for instance, rely on a deeper understanding and appreciation for earth’s landforms and processes.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kass, L. (1985). Toward a more natural science: Biology and human affairs. New York: The Free.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics