Preview

Science: Can God Really Be Explained Through Science?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1897 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Science: Can God Really Be Explained Through Science?
GOD SCIENCTIFICALLY SPEAKING
DRFAYE
Can God really be explained through Science?
One of my sisters was given homework to write a report on The Theory of Evolution. I offered to aid in the research. I wondered what would become of such an endeavor to answer the questions while being objective in my own beliefs. We would study the lives of men such men as Charles Darwin whose name in many Christians opinion is synonymous with the Anti-Christ.
The case for God is typically debated by Scientist due to the fact they cannot prove through human research that such a one exists. Before, I get to far into this article, let us first look at how Science is defined.
Science is defined as the systematic and logical approach to studying how things
…show more content…
Some studies have shown that one important aspect of Science is that it focuses only on the natural world; thereby anything considered supernatural does not fit into the definition of science. Science believes there is an explanation for all miracles and such things do not really exists; they have conclusions that have yet to be discovered.
Science does not recognize creation. The Big Bang Theory is science explanation on the beginning of all things. The “The Big Bang Theory” as by its own definition is a theory. When we look deeper into the word “Theory,” it means supposition, an idea or a way to explain a set of
…show more content…
It is observed through everyday living, studied by those who dare believe and experienced both far and near, by anyone who will have mustard seed faith. Science belongs to God and all life is traced right back to the Father of Life, and there is no doubt Science will continue until it too will say truly the presence of the Lord is in this place!
During my research, I came across an assessment in the Huffington Post on the views of a few Scientist.
Galileo “I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason and intellect has intended us to forego their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them. He would not require us to deny sense and reason in physical matters which are set before our eyes and minds by direct experience or necessary demonstrations.”
Sir Francis Bacon “God never wrought miracle to convince atheism, because his ordinary works convince it. It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism; but depth in philosophy bringeth men’s minds about to religion. For while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them, confederate and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He states that God has provided man “with senses, language, and intellect” which should be applied to acquire knowledge about this earth. Galileo recognizes that a small section of the text addresses astronomy, but not “the names of all the planets.” This incomplete set of information instigates man to further exploration and gain more knowledge. Additionally, these discoveries need to be backed by facts and experiments. However, Galileo states that doctrines surrounding faith and salvation “are firm enough that there is no danger of any valid and effective doctrine ever rising against…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Religious authority typically rejected scientific ideas. In Document 12, Gottfried Leibniz stated in his book that he believed God “governs minds as a Prince governs his subjects”. The ideas that God puts forth in the Bible are that of truth—despite the science that strenuously prove it incorrect. Scientists had to keep their scientific studies and experiments secretive because much of what they proved contradicted Church teachings. In Document 1, Nicolaus Copernicus speaks to Pope Paul III in his 1543 book, On the Revolution of the Heavenly Spheres, asking for his support of the sciences, and telling him that the…

    • 1531 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As scientists, or natural philosophers, made new discoveries and theories they often dedicated them to the church, whether it was literal dedication or whether the finding supported the church. Even though they meant to support the church, many of those who did not understand the findings rejected them, but the fact that the common man could not always understand what an astronomer had investigated does not mean that it should be rejected. For the beauty and usefulness of the discoveries support what the common man knows and understands which is that God is God. (Doc. 2) The pressure that came from being rejected pushed scientists to search for acceptance in many cases for fear of being outcast, and there was no greater place to search for acceptance than from the church. Nicolaus Copernicus, Polish priest and astronomer, dedicated his works to Pope Paul III stating how he was not one to shrink from another’s criticism and that his findings contribute to the well being of the Church. (Doc. 1) Copernicus was a man of the church as well, making his words to the Pope weighted, however. Natural philosophers used the church as evidence in their findings as well. Once atoms and the structure of the world were discovered, it was too mind-blowing to not believe that all this perfect complexity was not brought together by an all-powerful being. But seeing that most men during this time were in some way affiliated with the church, it was very common for men to make these sorts of assumptions. (Doc. 8) Religion thus gave scientists a reason for discovery and evidence supporting discoveries.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people believe that only science is correct. There is no evidence of the seven days of creation except by word, whereas all theories of evolution and the Big Bang have a large amount of evidence, and hundreds of hours of research dedicated to them. Evolution and the Big Bang have explanations for and biological reasons, whereas why would a God suddenly decide to make a universe and planet for living organisms?…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It would be difficult to look at science its methods and conclusions without looking at how any of us or anything came into being. In Genesis 1:1-4, it articulates as such, “1IN THE beginning God (prepared, formed, fashioned, and) created the heavens and the earth.2The earth was without form and an empty waste, and darkness was upon the face of the very great deep. The Spirit of God was moving (hovering, brooding) over the face of the waters. 3And God…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Galileo theory of the Earth revolving around the sun had him almost executed by the Roman Catholic Church. Galileo’s use of the telescope marked him as a modern science marvel. His discoveries spanned from the moons of Jupiter to the moon. In relation to cosmology, Galileo’s contributions to the understanding of the universe and how it begun helped shape the modernization of cosmology. It was not until later that Galileo’s contributions were proven to be liable and relative. Present-day cosmology continues to make theories and observations in attempt to prove out or further discover the realms of the universe.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The existence of God would be obvious if we weren’t distracted by life in the sensory world. And the knowledge of God saves us from doubt about other things we are certain of.”…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book acknowledges that this discipline is overwhelmingly secular. Because of this, science tries to leave out God as creator and the ultimate answer to difficult questions. Accordingly, the author does not suggest that all scientific thought and testing be discarded, rather science confirms what we know about God.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most common and influential argument’s for the existence of God are design arguments. In the last fifty years design arguments have received the most attention philosophically. Design arguments are both empirical and inductive arguments. Design arguments identify properties of objects in nature and argue that the only way that they could have occurred or the best explanation for them is that there is some intelligent/higher being that created or conceived the object. William Paley was a Christian apologist in the eighteenth century who was known for his popular version of the teleological argument (“watchmaker analogy”). Paley stressed the idea that the world’s complexity and design is not based off luck or chance, but rather designed by…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not believe that it is possible to “prove” the existence of God in the scientific sense. However, based on the arguments reviewed in favor of the rationality of God, I can enumerate reasons to believe that God exists and is active in the universe.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, if by… No, and yes. Absolutely not! Not necessarily. Of course not. No. No, but it should. No. Yes. No, not at all. It depends. Of course not. No, but only if……

    • 13856 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a result of many new astronomical discoveries throughout the seventeenth century, it was clear science and religion greatly contradicted each other. Followed by the questioned findings of Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei believed the sun was situated motionless in the center of the universe while the earth rotated on its axis, all the while revolving around the sun. This idea, though scientifically proven to be correct, completely opposed the underlying structure of the universe and heavens as originally stated in the Holy Bible. In his “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina,” Galileo explained to his subject how what was found true through physical findings were not in fact directly coincided with matters of faith. Unlike what was stated in the Bible, Galileo felt as though faith and science were two separate entities, and should be kept apart. Naturally, Galileo’s scientific findings sent the Catholic world into an uproar. As a result of the craziness that ensued from his astronomical discoveries within the theologian society, Galileo believed theologians should not have been allowed to be involved in the world of science during the 17th century in his “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina.”…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is also an alternative scientific theory – The Steady State Theory. This says that the Universe is not changing, and had no beginning which makes the Big Bang nonsense – but few scientists accept this theory, and it doesn’t have any solid evidence.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rise of atheism

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Religions response to science has been widely assessed however both religion and science have agreed that nothing from the challenge of science has amounted to proof that God does not exist, even the famous scientist Richard Dawkins has accepted this fact. Many religious people believe that science can be part of god’s work and scientist believes that science and god can be alongside each other too. Science refer to this as god of the gaps, this is when the parts that science cannot explain must be god. However as it appears that science can explain how some aspects of the world could have been created and why these events happened it does not mean that god was not behind these events and making them happen and giving them a purpose which science cannot find the answer too. Here I can see that religion and science both together are successfully accepting one another as they both do not have concrete evidence to say wither one is right or wrong.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speech on God vs. Science

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many preconceptions of ours and our society have been shown baseless by the advancement of science and technology. The classical school of thought that our ancestors left for us have sown in our minds many superstitious beliefs, which are in turn contradictory to science. This contradiction between rationalism and faith, logic and belief root to the main debate god or science.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays