Preview

Science Social English Hindi Etc

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Science Social English Hindi Etc
Justice delayed is justice denied

Justice delayed is justice denied" is a legal maxim meaning that if legal redress is available for a party that has suffered some injury, but is not forthcoming in a timely fashion, it is effectively the same as having no redress at all. This principle is the basis for the right to a speedy trial and similar rights which are meant to expedite the legal system, because it is unfair for the injured party to have to sustain the injury with little hope for resolution. The phrase has become a rallying cry for legal reformers who view courts or governments as acting too slowly in resolving legal issues either because the existing system is too complex or overburdened, or because the issue or party in question lacks political favor.
[edit] Origin
There are conflicting accounts of who first noted the phrase. According to Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations, it is attributable to William Ewart Gladstone but such attribution was not verifiable.[1] Alternatively, it may be attributable to William Penn, although not in its current form.
The phrase may alternatively be traced to the Magna Carta, clause 40 of which reads, "To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice." The reason one goes to court is to get justice, and "Justice Delayed is Justice Denied"
As Chief Justice Warren E. Burger noted: "A sense of confidence in the courts is essential to maintain the fabric of ordered liberty for a free people and three things could destroy that confidence and do incalculable damage to society: that people come to believe that inefficiency and delay will drain even a just judgment of its value; that people who have long been exploited in the smaller transactions of daily life come to believe that courts cannot vindicate their legal rights from fraud and over-reaching; that people come to believe the law - in the larger sense - cannot fulfill its primary function to protect them and their families in their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution vested immense power in the judicial branch of the government. Over the years, the highest Court of the land, the United States Supreme Court, has ruled on a multitude of cases, making new laws and setting precedence. The American people deem the judicial body supreme and, perhaps irrationally, trust they will interpret the Constitution more accurately and ethically compared to the executive and legislative branches. However, decisions of the courts are not purely legal, but rather a synthesis of attitudinal, legal, and strategic processes.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Its is emphatically, the province and duty of the judicial department, to say what the law is.” (Ducat, Craig Constitutional Interpretation p. 10) These seventeen words written two hundred years ago made the highest court in the United States supreme, and making it so, Chief Justice John Marshall’s words in that sentence continue to make an impact on every Supreme Court case thereafter. Justice Marshall laid the basic foundations to protect the Federal system that was established by the Constitution. In Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Gibbons v. Ogden the Supreme Court maintained the United States as a federal state.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Brethren Summary

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While Marshal brought the court into its power, and the Warren court fought for civil liberties, Burger established modern technology and brought to light the political nature of the highest court in the land. Warren Burger was selected by a scheming President Nixon who had hoped to appoint a Chief Justice to reverse the liberal change done by Warren; already Burger is in office for political reasons rather than merit and in the interest of the people. Once in office, instead of adjusting to court and the way of being a justice, Burger is deterred to make the court, the law, and the justices adjust to him. He remains stuck in his conniving political games, for example, changing the status quo and voting last to ensure he would be in the majority and assign who writes the opinions. Besides his obvious power complex, that exemplifies how Burger is willing to abandon his morals and beliefs for dominate and a favorable view in the…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the heart of the institutional maintenance, the reason why justices constrain themselves is the fear of non-implementation. Matthew E. K. Hall looks at two paths of Supreme Court constraints: rational anticipation and the institutional maintenance model. They do not fear non-implementation in vertical cases as they do not have to rely on outside sources to implement their decisions. However, they do have to rely on outside sources to implement their decisions in horizontal cases. The court’s institutional integrity is the source of influence: they are not elected, and they have to rely on public diffused support for this.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Brethren Sparknotes

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Brethren is a book about the evolution of the Burger Court during the years of 1969 to 1976. The Brethren takes readers inside the court for a fascinating view of how things really work: how justices build majorities for their points of view and, occasionally, how they lose them; how the chief justice can use his power to assign cases to impress their philosophy on the final decision; and the unique role played by the law clerks. This book is a balanced account of the inner workings of the Supreme Court from 1969 to 1976, the first seven years of Warren Burger's tenure as Chief Justice. The storytelling is also clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work makes the bias forgivable. It describes the decision…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    <html><head></head><body><p>In a nation of democratic governance, the United States has unquestionably succeeded in its own development and potency since the establishment of the Constitution. The United States was founded in hopes of having a truly free, full functioning society. In order to achieve such a goal, the framers of this country drafted the Constitution brilliantly and attentively. With the creation of the three branches, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, the Constitution also created checks and balances, the capability for each branch to check the power of the others. To ensure the continuing proficiency of our democratic nation and "checks and balances" system, it is crucial to equalize the branches by separating, and equally distributing power among the three branches. However, before 1803, the judicial branch was lacking such said power over the legislative and executive branches. It was not until the case of Marbury v. Madison that Chief Justice Marshall justified the power of judicial review to the judiciary branch, finally obtaining equal leverage among the legislative and executive branches. With the implementation of judicial review, the U.S. Supreme Court has jurisdiction and authority to strike down law, overturn executive acts, and legally bind a public official to properly carry out constitutional duties. Indisputably, the practice of judicial review is the main power of the United States Supreme Court to date.</p>…

    • 1489 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (King, April 16, 1963) this quote was said by Martin Luther King Jr. Injustice is a synonym of the word unfairness; meaning, that injustice is when people are not being fair. In the cases of To Kill a Mockingbird, The Scottsboro Boys and The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire Injustice was a part of the verdict. In To kill a Mockingbird Tom Robinson was accused of raping Mayella Ewell. In the Scottsboro boys case the nine boys that were found on the train were accused by the two women that they raped the two women. In the shirtwaist fire the women were suing the owners of the building because they locked the women in and there were no exits. The women pleaded and the jury still found the owners not guilty. In the trials the Scottsboro boys, Tom Robinson and The shirt waist fire women were falsely accused of what they did. Each defendant/prosecution was accused for something they didn’t do. (Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird) (Scottsboro Boys, Documentary)…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States was created by the Article Three, Section One of the Constitution and plays an incredibly important role in the balance of power within the United States. To that extent, it’s important to know the judicial philosophies of the judges who sit on the highest court in the United States. These philosophies are responsible for influencing lives of Americans depending on how they are recognized and implemented. It becomes even more imperative to understand with the knowledge that the court itself appoints a new justice, on average of every two years. (Regan, 2015, p. 18) With how influential their cases can be, it’s also important to understand how it can affect the nation as a whole, when those philosophies…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice denotes to reasonable delivery of resources in the healthcare industry. Rather than law; the rights regarding justice deals with respect to individuals. Every member of society in the healthcare system should have equal rights in terms of seeking healthcare.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    views as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole,…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you know who made the quote “Education is the key to the golden door to freedom”?…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Harriet Jacobs

    • 3483 Words
    • 14 Pages

    No one can say for sure the exact origin of the term, but it was commonly used by the 1840’s and is a part of American history.…

    • 3483 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Funding

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ‘Access to Justice means everyone should have access to advice and assistance from lawyers.’ (Classroom material p.1) Legal advice is important to civil cases but even more in criminal cases where liberty of a person is at stake because they would have committed a crime and they might go to prison for it therefore in criminal cases it’s vital for a person to receive legal funding. Poor and less educated people are denied access to justice as it is difficult for them to get advice or for them to be offered assistance.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those who seek justice, are normally the ones that lose something, they feel will never be…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics