Preview

Sectionalism In America

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1202 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sectionalism In America
Sectionalism in the United States

By: Rashaan Williams 8326277 Word Count: 1487

Cite Works Page
"Grimke's Appeal." Grimke's Appeal. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2012. <http://utc.iath.virginia.edu/abolitn/abesaegat.html>.
"Weld's American Slavery As It Is." Weld's American Slavery As It Is. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2012. <http://utc.iath.virginia.edu/abolitn/abestwa8t.html>.

"Primary Documents in American History." Missouri Compromise: Primary Documents of American History (Virtual Programs & Services, Library of Congress). N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2012. <http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Missouri.html>.

"Mason-Dixon Line." About.com Geography. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2012.
…show more content…
Mainly between the North and the South, they both had a lot of issues and wanted to do what they felt was best for the people. Slavery was the more significant topic than any other topics like social structures, expansion, etc. Many of these topics played a role with the diversity of the country that led to desperate measures. This was an issue that continued all throughout the mid …show more content…
The country was divided into two groups, which were known as slave holders and abolitionists. Due to the desire of the south they wanted to acquire slaves for cheap, the North didn’t feel at ease with the situation, so the two groups were separated geographically. On the other hand, the North was not any economy based off agriculture or unskilled laborers because there economy was not dependent upon slaves. The North felt that there was no need for slaves, and they didn’t see slavery as fair or dignified. The South relied on slaves as a base of production; they use them to operate large farms and large cotton plantations. Many people tried to come up with a solution to the issue of slavery with compositions and bills that lay down laws to come into agreement with both sides. What made it happen was the Missouri Compromise. This document was able to set the standards during the time. It was also able to divide the country into two different groups geographically by a system called the 36 degree 30 minute line. This bill clearly stated that no states above the proposed line shall have slavery, with exception to those already in existence. This meant that all new states being brought into the country from different directions had an opportunity to have slavery if they lay below the line. Of course, the south wasn’t behind the idea, as it allowed the northern non-slave states to outnumber the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Northerners were against adding Missouri to the union as slave state because it would disrupt the balance of power in congress between slave and free states; Missouri should be a free state but Missouri wanted to come in as a slave state. This gave a new set up to the states and came up with the 36’30 line, an imaginary line was drawn across the southern border of Missouri. Any future added north to the line would be free and any future state on the southern side would be slave. This gives birth to the idea of sectionalism, loyalty to the state rather than to the whole…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the war with Mexico, the North and South were having some issues with slavery and the more or less under control of slavery. With the Missouri Compromise they had settled which areas would have slavery and which they would not. And of course, there was still tensions between the North and South about slavery. With the war with Mexico the change with what to make of slavery was making tensions the were much more intense. The war with Mexico led to the taking of huge amounts of land, by the saying that the US had decided that the status of slavery in the new territories that was Mexico’s land.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the second decade in the 19th century, American was going through tough times. The War of 1812 was raging causing destruction throughout America while many domestic issues divided the nation. One of the most major issues was the New England Colonies’ feelings of sectionalism while the South was as nationalistic as ever. In 1820 however, the roles reversed as the South became the regionally favored area while New England became a larger support of the country. This swap is due to the economic changes that occurred between 1815 and 1820. Economic developments such as trade tariffs, slavery issues and the industrial revolution created a new commercial environment adjusting the views of the citizens of said regions. Without this economic shift, the Northern States would have garnered more support to break away from the US while the South would have wanted to preserve the union.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several reasons highlighted behind the division, such as; states’ rights and disagreements over tariffs and the most influential issue about slavery (Tindall…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years of 1830-1860, there were many conflicts on the views of slavery within our country. The North was working to bring an end to slavery with the creation of the routes to free slaves. The South was enthusiastic about the continuation of slavery with the help of the courts. The conflicts were put on hold with many compromises, but were dismantled by future legislation leading to bloodshed in America.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was the resolution to the conflict involving those for slavery (the South) against those opposed to slavery (the North). Antagonism between the North and the South began to emerge in 1820 when Missouri applied to the United States as a slave state. At the time, in 1819, the United States had exactly eleven slave states and exactly eleven free states; by allowing Missouri into the nation, that balance would be disrupted and the Senate would be spiked towards the South. Missouri was admitted into the nation, however, the House approved an amendment outlawing any imported slaves from Africa to Missouri and set the children of slaves free. Ultimately the Senate rejected the amendment forcing Missouri out of the nation.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While the southern states were in favor of slavery, the northern states vehemently opposed the idea. An expansion of slavery would have meant an increase in the territorial space and population. This in turn would give the Southern states increased power in the House. Although the Civil War had some time to initiate, the Compromise played a major role in the laying the groundwork for the war that was to come. It contributed to the division and disagreement between north and south, surrounding the topic of slavery. The issue built severe tension between the two sides of the…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The North and the South had very different views on slavery which only grew stronger and separated the two regions leading up to the Civil War. As the Union gained more land the big question was whether the new land would be considered a slave state or a free state. The South needed slaves to do hard labor on their land to keep the economy growing. The North did not have a need for slaves. They feared that allowing slavery in the North would increase large plantations in the area which would threaten their own growing industrial economy. An underlying issue with the South was the fear that the federal government would take control over the individual states and their rights, especially concerning slavery.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise outlawed the growth of slavery and involuntary servitude above the Mason Dixon Line which is located north of thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes, north latitude. Since slavery was outlawed in the north it limited the growth of slavery across the country. The North did not like idea of slavery because they had the same idea of abolitionist. There was also a greater consequence for having slaves. The idea of abolitionist was to outlaw slavery because the need for slaves was very low in the northern part of the country.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1820, the United States Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. Before it was passed the Northern states and Southern states had different ideas of the states. The North wanted to limit slavery, while the Southern states wanted more slavery. Missouri wanted to become a slave state in 1820, but the Northern states wouldn’t allow it. As a compromise, Missouri could be a slave state as long as Maine was added as its own free state, thus the Missouri Compromise. Along with these factors a rule of 36⁰30N was applied saying that in the Louisiana Territory, the states above the latitude line 36⁰ and 30 minutes North was admitted as a free state; the states below the same line were slave states. Historians say that the Missouri Compromise caused a national crisis, others question why both sides agreed to the compromise. Both Northern and Southern states both agreed to the Missouri Compromise in thought of their own benefits, but it cause a major national crisis instead.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The three components of the American System were establishing a new protective tariff, starting a new transportation system and restoring the national bank. Henry Clay thought that each of these components would strengthen and unify the nation because he thought the American system would unite the nation's economic resources because the south would grow food and raise animals that the north would eat and in return the south would by the manufactured goods the north made. A new transportation system would allow trade between the north and the south. Now America could finally become independent economically. And the tariff would help because during the War of 1812 British merchants brought a great deal of products to the United States and sold them at much lower prices than American made goods, so the tariff would raise the prices of the British goods so the American merchants could sell their products at a lower price.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: Mintz, Steven. "The Missouri Compromise." Digital History. 25 Oct. 2005. University of Houston. 2 Nov. 2005 .…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    13th Amendment Thesis

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There were many states in the south wanted to continue the practice of slavery president Lincoln issued "Proclamation for Amnesty and Reconstruction” which was a 10 percent plan that allowed a Southern State to join the union of abolishing slavery if 10 percent of its voters would oath of the allegiance to the union, however the Southern states declined the offer. Slavery continued over the years, lawmakers continued to present many proposals to reconstruct to have every state on the same…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was an issue in slave states from South and Free states North in 1800s. South states were the agricultural area so they needed slaves and support it, but not the North state. Several disputes exists, Congress performed compromises to settle these disputes. But these compromises could not hold for longer. (1820 - 1861: HOLDING THE UNION TOGETHER) Missouri Compromise in 1820, Nat Turner's Rebellion in 1831,…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The very heated debate over Missouri’s application for admission for statehood ran for three months.. Northerners argued that Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in a new state. Southerners said that new states had the same freedom of action as the original thirteen and were free to choose slavery if they wanted too. A compromise bill for the statehood of Missouri was finally worked out with the following provisions: Missouri would enter the union as a slave state and Maine, which was formerly part of Massachusetts, would enter as free, and except for Missouri, slavery wouldn’t be permitted in any land from the Louisiana Purchase lands north of latitude 36°30′, which is the lower territory line of Missouri. The Missouri Compromise upset many southerners because it established the idea that the government could make laws regarding slavery; northerners, on the other hand, said it went along with the expansion of slavery, even though only south of the compromise line could be slave states, it still allowed for slavery to expand westward.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays