Preview

Why Was The Civil War Inevitable

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
743 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Was The Civil War Inevitable
During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the issue of slavery was finally being dealt with in a certain regard. In the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, the north was still scared to upset the south so they didn’t do anything drastic. The south had this conspiracy that the north and the government was against them and that they were all trying to abolish slavery. Even though they're weren’t very many huge improvements to the slavery laws, it was fairly clear that there would be a big conflict to resolve the issue. The civil war was inevitable due to the Northwest Ordinance, the Missouri Compromise, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
There were signs that a war was inevitable all the way back in 1787 when the Northwest Ordinance
…show more content…
The very heated debate over Missouri’s application for admission for statehood ran for three months.. Northerners argued that Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in a new state. Southerners said that new states had the same freedom of action as the original thirteen and were free to choose slavery if they wanted too. A compromise bill for the statehood of Missouri was finally worked out with the following provisions: Missouri would enter the union as a slave state and Maine, which was formerly part of Massachusetts, would enter as free, and except for Missouri, slavery wouldn’t be permitted in any land from the Louisiana Purchase lands north of latitude 36°30′, which is the lower territory line of Missouri. The Missouri Compromise upset many southerners because it established the idea that the government could make laws regarding slavery; northerners, on the other hand, said it went along with the expansion of slavery, even though only south of the compromise line could be slave states, it still allowed for slavery to expand westward. This act held the union together for more than thirty years. It was finally repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, which established popular sovereignty regarding slavery in Kansas and Nebraska, even though both territories were north of the Missouri compromise line. The compromise line that is made really separates the north and the south and it allows the continuation of slavery. The south sees this as limiting slavery, which it is, but slavery is still happening in the Union. This would have been a good time to tell the south no and stop slavery but instead they decided to compromise which shows how scared the north was of the south even though the south didn’t have huge power. This makes the south really mad because yet again the government is getting involved with the issue of slavery and limiting the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the beginning of westward expansion, the issue of slavery in the newly settles territory became an important and dividing political issue. The Missouri Compromise tried to reach an agreement between the North and South, admitting Maine as a free state, but Missouri as a slave state. Although the Missouri Compromise was unsuccessful in satisfying the North and South, it was important in that it marked the boundary for slavery in the territory…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was written in the year of 1820 on March 3rd and was also passed on the same day. This compromise approved Missouri to come to America as a slave state, but conserved the correspondence between the North and the South by modeling the land of Maine out of Massachusetts and stopping slavery from territories accomplished in the Louisiana Purchase which is the north of the line of 36 30’ and this is the southern boundary of Missouri. The South and the North was not satisfied with the Missouri Compromise because many southern congressmen balloted to oppose the compromise. They opposed it because the limit on future slavery in the territories was not excessively abusive to the slave owners. It was abusive to them because the…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    President Lincoln supports the policy because he eventually wamts slavery to die out. He realizes that it will not go away if he just makes it illegal over night so he wants to limit the spread into new territories.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The North predominantly relied on trade and mercantilist profit making, whereas the South depended on labor-intense plantation industries that mostly required use of slavery. As the borderline states became the hotbed of slavery debate, the North and the South attempted to reach consent by Missouri Compromise, which is quintessential evidence that depicts the conflict on the practice of slavery. After Missouri was denied from joining the union because of its headstrong persistence on keeping slavery, the North and the South were able to reach a compromise that first accepted Maine to the union as a free state and then accepting Missouri as a slave state. The compromise not only ended up with a geographical line of 33'30'' that dissected the union but also signified the intensifying sectionalism ((F)). Even if Missouri Compromise was able to bring forth a temporary loosening of tension, it was rather an evanescent remedy of sectionalism that only foreshadowed the worsening conflict between the two parts of the…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was the resolution to the conflict involving those for slavery (the South) against those opposed to slavery (the North). Antagonism between the North and the South began to emerge in 1820 when Missouri applied to the United States as a slave state. At the time, in 1819, the United States had exactly eleven slave states and exactly eleven free states; by allowing Missouri into the nation, that balance would be disrupted and the Senate would be spiked towards the South. Missouri was admitted into the nation, however, the House approved an amendment outlawing any imported slaves from Africa to Missouri and set the children of slaves free. Ultimately the Senate rejected the amendment forcing Missouri out of the nation.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people did not like the idea of slavery being banned in large areas. The southerners feared that if territories didn’t have slavery, then they would become states and might take some of their…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil War Was An Inevitable Event In American History The Civil War was a nesscary war created by our own demise. As preivous mistakes of allowing slavery and compromise allowed a great nation such as the United States to have a nesscary war amongst each other to radacate it from its lands. This great issue can be traced back to the declaration of independence, three-fithts compromise, and as George Washington warned of political parties. This paper will show how the Civil War was an inevitable war for the greater good of the nation as a whole.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Civil War Became Inevitable There are many instances when the Civil War could have become inevitable. When the Declaration of independence was signed and slavery was still allowed, when John Brown attacked Harper’s Ferry with his small militia, or even when the Missouri Compromise was passed. All these instances showcase the ever growing divide between the Southern and Northern States. One instance though stands out in its direct and public attack. On the surface it was seen in the south as an acceptable reaction, in the north proof of the souths hard ways.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1800's, tensions between the North and the South grew uncontrollably due to their differing perspectives. Around the 1850's the South was one of the few remaining slave institutions in the Western World, additionally slaves had to endure harsh conditions as well as high mortality rates. Some factors that contributed to the regional development of the United States of America include, the Second Great Awakening, the economies of the North and South, and failed attempts (compromises) to resolve their differences. It is clear that even though everything was done to prevent the Civil War, it was still inevitable.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They argued that the debate was a violation of that understanding. The southern states also argued that they relied on the slaves for their livelihood, without them they would have no one to work on their farms and they would not be able to sell and distribute the things that they had depended on for their entire…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government may have tried to get the North and the South to come to a compromise on their differences during the 1800’s, but the Civil War was a completely inevitable event. One of the most notable differences between the North and the South was their stances on who should have more power in government. Northerners believed that federal government should be the one to decide whether slavery was to be abolished or not. The South disagreed since they felt that states should be independent, and have the right to make big decisions (like having slavery) without interference from the federal government. Their strong feelings were based on the fact that agriculture was what the Southerners depended for income and use of slave labor kept the…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War was fought between the Northern and Southern states of of America. Was the Civil War inevitable? It was a conflict bound to happen due to the differences between the North and South’s views on slavery, society, and politics. The South wanted their independence and freedom from the North, while the North wanted unity.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the Missouri Compromise being passed into law in 1820, this set about regulating slavery in the western territories. Stampp (1980) states that “a third essential requirement for avoiding an irrepressible conflict was acceptance of a federal policy of confining slavery to the fifteen states that recognised it at the time of the Mexican War. With the South wishing for the Missouri Compromise to be repealed, Potter (1976) states that Southern politicians waged a bitter fight against the Wilmot Proviso and in 1854 they secured the repeal of the Missouri Compromise before they would permit the passage of legislation to organise the territories of Kansas and Nebraska thus provoking an uprising of the northern people and encouraging the formation of the purely sectional Republican party, and doing severe damage to the conservative national Democratic…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The civil war was inevitable in the 1850s and by two sides that did not agree with each other on a lot of stuff but the most important one was slavery, which was Northern and southern states that could not agree with each other .”The south believed that they couldn't keep up with the Northern economy without the force of slavery. Some people in the North believed that slavery was not fair and also gave the South an unfair economic advantage”(prezi).This is saying that the south thinks they can't live without slavery and the north thinks it is unfair. The point where there was no turning back was in 1860 when Abraham Lincoln was elected. ”publicly announced his plans of abolishing slavery, it was widely protested against in the Southern states.…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays