Academy of Management Review
2007, Vol. 32, No. 2, 500–528.
MOTIVATION TO LEAD, MOTIVATION TO
FOLLOW: THE ROLE OF THE SELFREGULATORY FOCUS IN LEADERSHIP
PROCESSES
RONIT KARK
Bar-Ilan University
DINA VAN DIJK
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
In this paper we integrate recent theories of motivation and leadership. Drawing on the self-regulatory focus theory and on self-concept based theories of leadership, we develop a conceptual framework proposing that leaders’ chronic self-regulatory focus
(promotion versus prevention), in conjunction with their values, influences their motivation to lead and, subsequently, their leadership behavior. We further suggest that leaders may influence the motivational self-regulatory foci of their followers, which will mediate different follower outcomes at the individual and group level.
chological processes and mechanisms through which leaders motivate followers. Recent developments in motivation theory stress the importance of people’s self-regulatory focus as a central component shaping their motivations and behavior (Higgins, 1997, 1998). This theoretical development may be helpful in attempting to understand the ability of leaders to influence and motivate followers by arousing different self-regulatory foci of followers.
Our goal here is to draw from transformational and charismatic leadership theory (e.g.,
Avolio, Bass, & Jung, 1999; Conger & Kanungo,
1998) and from identity and self-concept-based theories of leadership (e.g., Kark & Shamir, 2002;
Lord & Brown, 2004; Lord, Brown, & Freiberg,
1999; Shamir et. al., 1993; van Knippenberg &
Hogg, 2003), as well as from the theory of regulatory focus (Higgins, 1997, 1998),
References: Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. 2001. Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1998. Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row. Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. 2001. “I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. 1995. Further assessments of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. 1996, Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. 2000. Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. 2002. Creativity under the gun Chan, K. Y., & Drasgow, F. 2001. Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 481– 498. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization Ashkanasy, N. M., & Tse, B. 2000. Transformational leadership as management of emotion: A conceptual review. Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. 1999. Reexamining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Barney, J. B. 1988. Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11: 656 – 665. Barsade, S. G. 2002. The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. 1994. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Chan, K. Y., Rounds, J., & Drasgow, F. 2000. The relation between vocational interests and the motivation to lead. Cole, E. R. 1999. Managing quality fads. New York: Oxford University Press. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. 1998. Charismatic leadership in organizations Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. 1997. Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69: 117–132. K., Al-Kelabi, S., Lee, S., & Keller, T. 1998. Individualized leadership: A new multiple level approach Beyer J. M. 1999 Taming and promoting charisma to change organizations Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. 2003. A qualitative study of cognitive asymmetry in employee affective reactions to leadership behaviors Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. 2004. Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. 1994. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 239 –263. Brewer, M. B. 1991. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. 2002. Impact of transformational leadership on follower development Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. 1985. Leaders: The strategies for taking charge Brickson, S. 2000. The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically Dvir, T., & Shamir, B