Preview

Separation Of The Soul In Plato's Phaedo

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
967 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Separation Of The Soul In Plato's Phaedo
Phaedo, written by Plato is the interpreted dialogues between Socrates, a major philosopher, as well as some others including Cebes, Simmias, and Echerates. The overall idea of the book is Socrates trying to convince his colleagues of his theories, which explains the fundamental argument that the soul is immortal. Since Socrates is introducing such unheard of ideas, and seeming to be challenging beliefs, he is sentenced to death. While awaiting his fate, Socrates asks only one thing of his colleagues, which is to share his theories. Some of his theories are easily accepted; while others require deeper explanation in order fully convince Socrates’ colleagues.
A true philosopher does not fear death, instead, they welcome it. The main goal is to become as close to death as possible because they feel that this is the only way to gain true wisdom. The soul and the body are considered to be separate from each other. The body is also thought to get in the way of the soul, making it harder to become separate due to the needs of the body such as pleasure. The more one ignores the needs of the body, the closer one is to the separation of the body and soul.
Socrates’ fundamental argument that the soul is immortal is supported by
…show more content…
It is very important to live properly and do good in life because the effects of a person's actions will follow the soul through eternity no matter what form it takes. Simmias and Cebes both are convinced and agree with Socrates’ argument that the soul is immortal. Although they did valid arguments against Socrates, he is able to further explain his reasons for the theories and convinces them. They most likely had originally had doubt about the theory because it was a new idea, something that no one had challenged

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One argument Socrates uses is that snow always brings cold, as fire always brings hot. Fire will not bring cold and snow will not bring hot. He uses these opposites to say that soul brings life with it; therefore the soul will never bring death, the opposite of life. Anything that doesn't fall to death is indestructible. The soul must be indestructible. I agree with Socrates that the soul lives on. It makes sense to me that the soul is indestructible with his reasoning behind it.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ passage is formulated by the knowledge that the soul consists of three parts that are predisposed by our own desires. He is fundamentally attempting to disprove the notion that the soul is one.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ 2 Ancient Greece

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates was the original philosopher. Socrates dies from headlock, he had the choice to live a lonely life with food and water or to take the poison and he picked the headlock, because He believed the search for truth would lead to proper conduct. “The unexamined life is not worth living”, that was the quote that Socrates believed by saying that the purpose of life was personal and spiritual growth. Considered the nature of beauty, knowledge and what is right. His method was to ask questions, to try to expose the flaws in his fellow Athenians' preconceived notions. Socrates went on to teach Plato, the next great Athenian philosopher.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to prove that Socrates is successful in replying to the objections of Simmias and Cebes in Plato’s Phaedo, and in proving the soul to be immortal.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates who was he? “Socrates was a Greek philosopher. Socrates was born c. 470/469 B.C., in Athens”. (Wiki) In Phaedo, I understand that Socrates he has arguments that demonstrate that the soul is immortal. “If we live on after bodily death, there is no reason to fear it.” (Phaedo) However, these ideas are attributed to Socrates in Phaedo. Of course we have no way of knowing if he feared death or not. He appeared not to fear death but who knows. You hear people say all the time, "I have no fear of death"--I've even thought that to myself-- but there's no way they or myself can know that until the last few minutes of life. I think that virtually everyone will fear death at…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote is significant because it exemplifies the way Socrates uses HIS method. Socrates uses metaphors in order to humbly enlighten his audience. At times Socrates structure of explanation is perceived to be complex and or difficult to interpret. To simplify what he is attempting to get across usually takes a thorough examination. Socrates is from ancient times and his methodology still suits fit to modern day. Analyzing the context of his circumstances before death alone goes to show the depth of understanding one needs to comprehend his ideology and beliefs. This quote also provides us with the notion of not being selfish and to avoid pretentious. When one thinks about death or the chance of dying when they’re in a predicament because…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: In the section of immortal souls I learned that Socrates believe that the soul would never die. People saw him with craziness. They told him that how was it possible if it had not…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this paper, I will evaluate Socrates’ argument from Phaedo for why philosophers should desire death, perhaps only secondly to wisdom. I will argue that Socrates unfairly characterizes the truthfulness of the senses, and therefore projects a pessimistic view of the philosopher’s virtue during life. This pessimism towards life in conjunction with arguments for an afterlife that liberates reason, seems to suggest that Socrates believes philosophers should desire death: a happy prospect for condemned man, but perhaps a biased one.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is an impulse to fear death which exists due to the incessant involvement of religious ideas of damnation throughout time. Per Lucretius, this fear of death is completely theoretical, and is overall completely invalid; he argues that there is nothing after death, therefore, people have no reason to fear it. It is important to note not how he counters religion, but how he bases it upon his own ideas of atomism. Lucretius argues that the whole of the human body, mind and physique, are created from specific kinds of atoms. A principle idea of atomism is that the atoms people are comprised of provide the basis for the human senses, such as taste, smell, touch, etc.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s Apology: A Defense of Socrates was assumed to serve as Socrates’ trial for his being a fink and shady practices with the youth. Socrates safeguarded himself in a way that he was solely operating assistance to the god that claimed that he was more knowledgeable than everyone else. This defiance didn’t function, and he didn’t win the trial. Socrates continued defending during the ruling allocation of the trial, which lead to him being condemned to death, and aforesaid he was compelled to display his state or condition of being subject to death. Socrates looked at death as not being a dreadful. The information in this paper will clarify how Socrates developed that theory and display why this development is not true.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    helloham

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Socrates describes his views about the nature of Truth and knowledge. his view of his duties; the nature of his courage (why a good man need not fear death…

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus Vs Plato

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The subject of death and dying is one that philosophers have talked and wrote about for many years. It's impossible for anyone to know what truly happens after death, and many people have different and unique opinions regarding what happens after death, whether it be more of a religious or scientific view. Death is an unknown and interesting topic, that's why all of these unique opinions make for a good debate. Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher who was a student of Socrates has many works and Western influence on death and dying. Western views on the soul living after death is developed from Plato's ancient beliefs. Plato philosophized that the human soul is immortal, and that we shouldn't fear death. Epicurus, another ancient Greek philosopher argued that death is the end of the body and soul, and therefore should not be feared. These two philosophers have contrasting views on what happens after death, but both have similar views on how death shouldn't be feared. I find both Plato's and Epicurus's each make an equally persuasive case.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays