Preview

Serial Killer Research

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1206 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Serial Killer Research
The Insanity Of Killers

Serial murder is a psychological crime in many aspects. It is a planned, thought out action. The crimes themselves are often committed in order for the killer to gain a sense of power, control, and domination. There must be psychological desires and/or perceived needs that are otherwise lacking in his or her life.
Are serial killers insane? Not by legal standards. The legal definition of insanity is based on the 19th century M’Naghten Rules: Does the offender understand the difference between right and wrong? If he flees or makes any attempt to hide the crime, then the offender is not insane, because his actions show that he understood that what he was doing was wrong. Yet what person in their right mind would filet young children and write letters to the parents, glorifying over what a fine meal their child made? In the case of Albert Fish, the jury found him "insane, but he deserved to die anyway." A formal definition of legal insanity first was adopted in 1843 and is called the M 'Naghten test; its basic form still is used today. The test outlines that the defense must clearly prove that the accused person was so impaired psychologically as to not understand that the crime was wrong when he or she committed it. Most crime experts believe that serial killers are not insane and are fully aware of their actions at the time that they commit murders. What 's more, serial murderers commit several crimes, so it would follow that they should be proved as insane when planning and committing all the crimes they 're charged with. Some serial killers have been diagnosed as psychopaths, or people who act with total disregard for the rights of others; they can tell the difference between right and wrong, however, so psychopaths aren 't considered insane.

Society believes that the insanity defense is used far more often than it actually is and people believe that the defense is used as a tactic to avoid punishment. People perceive serial



Cited: Debswood, . "Serial Killer – Psychopathic or Psychotic." Scienceray.19 2008. Web. 2 Nov 2012. . Ward, Daniel. "The M 'Naghten Rule: A Re-evaluation." Marquette Law Review. Marquette Law Scholarly Commons, n.d. Web. 4 Nov 2012. . Bardsley, Marilyn. "Albert Fish." Trutv-Crime Library. A Time Warner Company. Web. 3 Nov 2012. . Sullivan, Andrew. "Mind of Madness." Studymode. studymode.com, 27 2011. Web. 5 Nov 2012. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ted Bundy Research Paper

    • 3271 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Many researchers have studied the fascinating yet horrifying world of serial murderers. The discoveries made since the phrase "serial killers" was coined, have amazed society. Despite all the knowledge discovered related to this topic, much more still needs to be disclosed.…

    • 3271 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ted Bundy Personality

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The inside of a serial killers mind is a very vast world of mixed emotions and the feeling of needing to fill a need. Something in a serial killers past is what typically triggers them to start…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is a controversial legal defense which states that a defendant should not be found culpable of a crime on the basis of insanity. The main factor that makes this defense so controversial is the difficulty in interpreting what exactly should be defined as insanity. To add the distortion, many different states also have completely different rules and attitudes towards the insanity defense. Many misconceptions about the insanity defense exist throughout society. For starters, the term insanity is strictly a legal term, not a psychological or medical term. Although various movies and television shows portray the insanity defense as a commonly used and successful defense, the opposite is true in reality. Even though statistics…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us Law

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The problem with this defense is that insanity in this particular essay is either examined from a legal angle or a psychoanalytical one which involves talking to people and having them take tests. There is however, no scientific proof confirming the causal relationship between mental illness and criminal behavior based on a deeper neurological working of the brain sciences. The psychiatrist finds his/herself in a double bind where with no clear medical definition of mental illness they must answer questions of legal insanity beliefs of human rationality, and free will instead of basing it on more concrete scientific facts.…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people have heard about the insanity defense in different famous cases where it has come up and been used. The insanity defense is a compromise between society and the law, meaning that society believes that criminals shouldn 't be punished if they are mentally incapable of controlling their conduct. There is a lot of controversy with the insanity defense, like questions such as what is the different if an insane person killed someone and if a sane person killed someone, the person is still dead. To which most have a point, it is still wrong but it all becomes an ethical game with killing someone who didn 't understand or comprehend what they did was wrong. The court defines it as there was only a crime committed if the person committed…

    • 3454 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Apsche, J.A. (1993). Probing the mind of a serial killer. (p.235). Morrisville, PA: International Information Association…

    • 4115 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most famous questions of all time asks, “Why do serial killers, kill?” Everyone is different in their own way, so no one can really answer that question specifically. Dr. Helen Morrison, author of “My Life Among The Serial Killers” interviewed ten famous serial killers to try to answer this question. She found that almost all of them had similar characteristics besides killing. Unlike what most people believe, she surprisingly found that these characteristics did not include insanity, child abuse, or drug abuse. Instead she explains that their most common trait is that they have an emotional age of an infant. Other characteristics include fluent lying, the lacking ability to comprehend that they did anything wrong, and no memory of the murders however when they do remember they show no mercy.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many criticisms of the insanity defense, and people have conveyed their displeasure at this type of defense. The four main complaints are that the public believes that many offenders attempt to use this plea, and that susceptible juries are acquitting these defendants often. The other two complaints are that the offenders are just released back into society way to soon, and that all insane people are excessively dangerous. The reality of the situation is far different from what public opinion warrants. (Greene et al,…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In criminal trials, the insanity defense is the claim that the defendant is not responsible for his or her actions due to mental health problems. Any mental illness could serve the basis for an insanity defense, excluding conditions that have antisocial behaviors as their primary characteristic and appear to have no physiological basis. Overall I believe that if someone has a real mental illness and it made him or her commit their crime, they should not go to prison. I feel that the insanity defense should be used as a viable defense.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity defense might be one of the most controversial of criminal defense strategies. It is the least used because only a few cases that are actually successful and when it is used, it tended to cause public debates. Many people become infuriated with the insanity defense because of cases like John Hinckley and Andrea Yates where they were found not guilty due to insanity, which fuel in the public’s misconception of the insanity defense. Insanity defense should not be abolished because they provide help to an accused whose suffering from mental illness, it does not have a deterrent effect on most crime, and it does not give the accused a free pass to commit a crime.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People assume that everyone who commits a crime and pleas insanity is using it as a way to get out of the crime they committed, especially murder. What most do not know is how hard it is to actually be convicted of Insanity. When someone is convicted of insanity, that also does not mean they are off the hook. Most if not all face a longer sentence then if they did not get convicted of insanity. What exactly does insanity mean? “Insanity is the legal term that refers to a mental disease or defect that impairs the reason and or will to control actions.” (Samaha,2015, pg209) There are two cases that I am going to talk about that both plead insanity but both had different results. The case of Andrea Yates and Eddie Ray Routh, two very big cases that happened years apart from each other in Texas…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity as a Defence

    • 6028 Words
    • 25 Pages

    The insanity defense is a rare and very controversial subject. It is basically a defense used in court, by psychotics, to get off free with a crime they committed. In order to be found innocent using the insanity defense one must prove that he was unable to notice that his actions were wrong. Although definitions of legal insanity differ from place to place, generally a person is considered insane and is not responsible for criminal conduct if, at the time of the offence, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, he or she was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his or her acts. A fairly recent case that used the insanity defense was the case of Andrea Yates. She drowned her five children in a bathtub and said that voices told her to do it. How can a person get off free for something as heinous as this? The insanity defense has been around in Canada since 1892, and is still being used to this day. There have been many people all over the world who have used insanity as a defense, to walk free from their mistake. Just like Vince Li, he was found not criminally responsible for the horrendous murder and beheading of Tim McLean on a Greyhound Bus in Manitoba. Feigning, Malingering, Factitious Disorders, and Somatoform Disorders are the four main key aspects of criminal mental health issues that are considered when professionals are asked to determine the authenticity of a criminal's supposed insanity plea. The professionals also have to decide what sort of treatment would be best to treat criminals. There are several approaches, such as: Medical, Psychotherapy, and Incarceration. When treating…

    • 6028 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Insanity Defense

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The insanity defense has been a controversial subject for years and years. One of the main reasons for this controversy is the inability for lawmakers to decide on a solid legal definition of insane. There are countless standards of insane; each court has used different interpretations of the term insane. One of the first serious attempts to define insane legally was in 1843. This occurred due to the M'Naghten case. Daniel M'Naghten was charged with the attempted assassination of Prime Minister Robert Peel. As a paranoid schizophrenic, M'Naghten was found not guilty and had set a rule for the insanity defense. This rule declared it was not right to hold a person legally accountable for unlawful actions committed while afflicted with a mental disorder(The M’Naghten). This disorder must prevent the person from understanding what he or she is doing and must also prevent them from comprehending that their conduct is wrong. Over time this idea was seen as too lenient and not structured enough. About 40 years later, in Alabama Supreme Court, the “irresistible impulse test” was formed. This law said those who wished to plead not guilty by reason of insanity had to demonstrate that they could not control their actions and behaviors when their crimes were committed (A Brief History). On some occasions the defendant does not have to match all of the descriptions of insane to plea insanity. For instance, John Hinckley was the man who tried to…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you think that serial killers are naturally insane or are there some kind of chemical…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mind of a serial killer has never been diagnosed. The environmental conditions have never been identified. The chromosomal patterns have yet to be determined. But serial killers exist. They are obsessed individuals for sure. They have no conscience and lack remorse.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays