Preview

Sharecrop Contract

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
496 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sharecrop Contract
-------------------------------------------------
Top of Form Sharecrop Contracts of the 1882 was a contract that seemed to be for the landowners and not for the actual sharecropper. The landowners seem to not really take care of the sharecroppers in any way. The landowner’s responsibilities seem to only be to supply the land or more like renting it and reaping the profits of the share croppers in order to keep them in debt to the landowners and never actually freeing them to own their own land and freedom actually keeping them not, as slaves, but still getting the benefits of slavery. The landowners agreed to supply 30 to 35 acres and furnish them, or basically rent them, a team of horses, a plow, and farming implements. Landowners insisted that the sharecroppers give them half of their crops no questions ask or at least make up for half of the fodder even if the sharecroppers crops failed for any reason. The sharecroppers wasn’t even supposed to be concerned with where the seed to the cotton or corn went or even know how much product they produced, the Landowner kept it housed and took it to the market and sold it and the sharecropper had to just trust that they was being honest in giving them what was left after the Landowner took out all the expenses and deductions. The landowners also made it where the sharecroppers could not plant any produce at their place of living if so the Landowner received a portion of it. The Landowners also said what when and where the sharecroppers should put their fences and if it is not to his liking they would have to tear it down and rebuild it from the bottom up as well as if the land owner furnishes the mule or horse the sharecropper must put 1000 good sized rails and keep it up as seen fit to the landowners. The landowners also insist that the sharecropper can only work for him as to keep them from receiving any money from anywhere else to help assist with living expense in order to make sure that they are in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At first the Bureau had gave 850,000 acres to the freedmen but President Andrew Johnson later took it back and the land in turn were given to the Confederate landowners giving the blacks no choice and forcing them to work in the plantations. At first the white landowners wanted to restore gang labor but the freedmen wanted to maintain their freedom refused to sign the contract ultimately forcing the white owner to come up with sharecropping as some sort of compromise. Under sharecropping, the land was divided into a 20 to 50 acres parcel that allowed a single family to farm it. The deal is usually half of the crop to be given to the landlord in exchange for the land, housing and…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharecropping was just a step up from slavery, but it allowed newly freed slaves to "somewhat" have something of their own. I say somewhat because their former master still had control over them because they had to sign a sharecropping contract. This sometimes required them to work 10 hours a day and also in harsh conditions. If the sharecropper went against the contract then it would be deducted from their pay. However, through this they were not land owners. They got paid for their work, but some of that money went to taking care of their family and the rest went to paying back debt they owe. They would ultimately in this cycle of owing because they do not make…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the civil war ended, the freedmen of the south needed a way to get back into the fields and rebuild the southern economy. The Congress tried to give freed slaves their own little farm, but they were not ready to run one after working only in the fields all their lives. The way this problem was solved was with tenant farms. Freemen and former slaves were allowed to work in the fields of a landowner, and in return, they were supplied with food, shelter, clothes, seeds, and equipment. I don’t think tenant farms and sharecropping was a wise way to run the farming industry after the civil war. Though sharecropping was bad for many, it did benefit some people. It benefitted landowners for several reasons. Reason number one being they didn’t…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essay, "Forty Acres and a Gap in Wealth", by Henry Louis Gates Jr. was a nice descriptive paper touching on an interesting topic in today's world. Previously, I did not know of the forty acres and a mule Southern Homestead Act. I find the fact that the families that participated in the Act succeeded much more than the people that did not. Also, the fact that the Act failed so miserable is also thought provoking, and because of the failure, Americans are left wondering, what if? I agree with the author that there are steps that can be taken to dissolve the problem. However, as the author said, everyone must be willing to help out.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The central issue was over the ownership of the ranches, which the farmers had leased from the railroad nearly ten years earlier with intentions of eventually purchasing the land. Although originally priced at $2.50 to $5 per acre, the railroad eventually opened the land for sale at prices adjusted for land improvements, leading to the conflict depicted in the book.…

    • 3663 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War ended in December 1865, and the slaves were free. They hoped to be treated as equal citizens who could vote, gain an education and live peacefully and equally with the whites. Many former slaves did not want to work for wages because they would still have to do what they were told by the whites. The solution seemed to lay in sharecropping, but that proved wrong. Plantation owners broke up their land into small pieces upon which the former slaves could grow their own crops. In return for seed and equipment, the sharecropper would give the plantation owner a third or a half of his crop. This was just like slavery. This would still make the African Americans go back to work at plantations. Even though slavery was abolished sharecropping was just a loophole. This was another way to force blacks back into plantations.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This became a new of form of slavery in the South. Many problems emerged from sharecropping. Freedmen were forced into an unending cycle of debt. They had no money to buy tools or seeds, which caused them to borrow supplies from the landowners. The plantation owners got to pick how much they charged for the supplies and what crops they would plant. This took away their economic freedom, freedmen were no longer allowed to decide what they produced to make money. The plantation owners had control over their lives because they owed them money. They influenced their decisions and limited their ability to participate in society. If the plantation owner told them that they could not vote, then they would not. This shows how their lack of economic freedom contributed to the loss of their political freedom. Therefore, this proves that It is not possible to be politically free if you are not economically…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I learned that some of the farmland is bought by large corporations from the local land owners. The large corporations would supply all the necessities for the farmers and would pay the local farmers to basically rent their land out to them. The large corporations get the crops in return. The large corporations will usually export the crops to other countries. But this causes issues when the large corporations decide that they don’t want to use the land anymore and then the land usually sits vacant and doesn’t get any use for farmland. In my predeparture research I learned that 3 percent of landlords own about 70 percent of the land. This information that I got about the large corporations getting crops from local farmers is new information that I did not know before the…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    sharecropping

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why did many freed slaves become sharecroppers? What do you think would be at risk for a freed slave to become a sharecropper on his former master’s plantation? They were slaves not long ago so they had nothing but the clothes on their back so they needed land and a home. The master would still be used to treating the slave badly and it would be very awkward.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lifestyle they had become accustom to were harsh in which they barely had enough food eat and clothes to wear from the hot sun or the cold winter months. Many African Americans became sharecropper where they worked the land for the white landowners who in return provide them shelter and supplies to work the land and in return the white landowners will receive a majority of the profit they produce. The agreeable contract would keep African Americans at a disadvantage because at the end of the season they would owe the landowner more than what they were able to produce.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Farmers' Grievances

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Farmers saw that low prices led to their lack of prosperity and that trusts joined with railroads and politicians to pick people's pockets. Prices dropped in certain sections of the country and later proved that farming was carried at an actual loss because it was over the cost of production. A western farmer had to sell his corn for eight to ten cents a bushel when the eastern broker demanded more than a dollar for it. Trusts dominated the market by buying raw material at their own price, then selling the finished product at any price they wanted. Trusts furnished the farmer with clothing, with the machines he had to use, with the fuel he had to burn, with the materials for living.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, enclosure is bad for some. The poorer farmers will end up selling their lands to rich landowners, when they cannot afford the closing expenses of the fields such as buliding hedges and a farm house. Some farmers do not have the legal documents to prove to the parliament that the land is theird. Those who worked and made…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enclosure Act

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The farmers wanted to make more money after the enclosure. There was an entrepreneurial attitude. The farmers wanted to own land. These attitudes, however, hurt the poor farmers. The landlords, who were concerned about profits, did not care like they did during the village method about waving rents and look out for the farmers. Now all they wanted was their money.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government also introduced a land ceiling reform, which put a limit to the amount of land a person could own. This meant that wealthy landowners had to give up portions of their land. The government’s plan was to distribute the excess land among marginal farmers. But due to the laws of inheritance, the already small piece of land became smaller and smaller as it was divided among children. This reform was also not much of a success as it resulted in low productivity.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharecropping Case Study

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hence in our model as shown in Figure 1, the source of land for IMFIs would be waqf, where the waqf organization would hold the land from public and family waqf. The capital would be used from government funds, external funds and savings of the client. This would be enough for the IMFI to act as a landlord in the sharecropping contract. So, for the sharecropping contract, the landlord and the farmer should enter into the sharecropping contract where the decisions regarding supervision, input and output sharing are made. Once the contract is settled, then the input would be provided for the sharecropping project based on the terms of the contract. Mostly, each party would provide specific inputs. As it is discussed earlier that the cost of supervision can be decreased if the landlord convey his intentions to the farmer that he is only concern with the adequate output with less damage to the soil fertility. In such case, the cost of supervision would decrease and less effort would be required to monitor the farmer. On the other hand, the farmer would also supervise his labour for the sake of producing efficient level of output with less damage to land fertility. Hence, the supervision would become the joint responsibility of both the parties. On the other hand, in the process of sharecropping…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays