Preview

Sheriff Appeal Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1062 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sheriff Appeal Court
The Sheriff Appeal Court (Civil):
A large margin of cases in Scotland are heard in the Sheriff court therefore it is the busiest court within the Scottish system as it deals with both civil and criminal cases. There are 6 sheriffdoms in Scotland and each one has a sheriff principle with a number of duties which will vary depending on the courts they are in charge of. The Sheriff Appeal Court hears the appeals from the summary criminal proceedings in the sheriff court and will also hear civil cases from the sheriff court which includes the Sheriff personal injury court. Case of “JACK CUMMING vs SSE PLC” would be a prime example of the personal injury cases the court faces in the sheriff appeal court. In this example Jack Cumming seeks damages
…show more content…
It deals with all types of civil cases from civil wrongs (delict) which can be anything from damages, negligence, trespassing etc. other types of cases the court deals with include contract, commercial family law and many others. The Court of Session is split up into two courts, the Outer House and the Inner House. The Outer House can hear cases that have not been to any court before whilst the Inner House mainly the appeal court. As stated previously it would deal with cases coming from both the Outer House and the Sheriff Court. Scotland also has a Supreme Court of its own separate from the United Kingdom Supreme Court. The civil justice system in Scotland is quite unique due to the fact the jurisdiction of the Sheriff Courts and the Court of Sessions overlap

As it was stated previously, The Sheriff Appeal Courts foundation was based on the then lord Justice Clerk, Lord Gill's Scottish Civil Courts Review. At the time Lord Gill criticized the civil justice system describing it as “a Victorian model that had survived by means of periodic piecemeal reforms” and also stating that “It is failing the litigant and it is failing society” (team, 2014). The review described the different ways in which the civil justice could speed up the civil justice system by taking different steps such as:
• Refining access to
…show more content…
Many reforms that were proposed by Lord Gill have however have been opposed to by legal professions and solicitors who are worried about losing their exclusive rights to be able to charge whatever they would like for their services (team, 2014). Lord Gill came to the conclusion that 1/3 of appeals to the inner house came from the sheriff courts whilst 2/3 came from direct from the sheriff courts which means it would not go through the principle sheriff but would directly go to the inner house. Lord Gill recognised that the majority of these appeals were not complicated and did not require a new national court which would be named the Sheriff Appeal Court could be established in order to deal with these appeals. Nevertheless, Lord Gill proposed that more complex appeals could be dealt with by the Senators of the College of Justice in the Supreme Court of Scotland. Civil Appeals are regulated by Act of Sederunt made by the Court of Session on 8 December 2015 and came into force on 1st of January 2016 (Session,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ocr Law Unit1 Chapter 5

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mode of trial - magistrates decide what they think is suitable and if they will accept jurisdiction (s19 of mag court act 1980 - consider seriousness, nature of case, own powers of punishment, representations of prosecution and defence). Cases involving complex questions of fact or law should go to crown. Prosecutions wishes might be considered also.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The arrangements in place between the Local Court and the District Court in relation to cases committed to Sydney District Court and Sydney West District Court are:…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unit 23

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages

    This court deals with mainly criminal cases but rarely civil cases. All criminal cases start off in the Magistrates’ Court and are heard by either lay magistrates or district judges. District judges are legally trained but lay magistrates are not, they do however have to be assisted by a legally trained clerk. Magistrate Courts will only hear cases that have happened in their area and can only administer punishment of up to £5,000 or 6 months imprisonment. If the crime requires more than what the magistrate can administer than the case will be passed on to the Crown Court. Jury can also move up the case to the Crown Court if the defendant asks for trial.…

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question Two: The Magistrates’ Court is the lowest court in the Victorian Court hierarchy. It has the ability to hear up to $100,000 for all civil disputes including personal injury. All disputes that are under $10,000 go to arbitration. In its criminal division, the Magistrates’ Court can hear summary offences such as minor assault and careless driving, indictable offences heard summarily, committal proceedings, bail applications and warrant issues. The Magistrates Court has no appellate jurisdiction.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The spaces are rectangular and overall it forms an L-shape. Its original function is a Court of Petty Sessions. The Court of Petty Sessions deal with a wide range of cases such as administrative breach, minor criminal activities, civil cases and commitment of wrongdoings[3]. To accommodate this function, it consists of three courtrooms: the City Court and District…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: The English Legal System – 9th Edition (2008/2009) by Catherine Elliot and Frances Quinn…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ss144 Unit 2 Essay

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The function of the County Court House is relatively the same to both the individual and society as a whole. The Court House ensures proper justice is served and all laws are abided by. For the individual this process can be very frustrating. Whether the person is there to pay a fine, dispute a charge against them or pursue civil action against another who has done wrong by them, the process can be very long and time consuming. For society the process is just as time consuming, however, is less likely to be as frustrating since a judge is more difficult to deal with on an individual basis than on a large public scale.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Dream is defined as the traditional social ideals of the United States, such as equality, democracy, and material prosperity. The American Dream is at work within each character’s life. Positively when it can be achieved and negatively when the expectations are unrealistically high. In the story the author, Arthur Miller, compares successful businessmen to a non-successful delusional salesman. The successful businessmen are Ben, Charlie and Howard. Willy is the main character who does not understand his lack of success in the salesman’s world. Willy’s two sons Biff and Happy are also non-successful businessmen. Willy cannot understand why he has not been successful with his life, so he lies to his sons in order to make himself look better as a father and a person.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The basic division in the structure of criminal courts is between the lower criminal courts – the local courts, Children’s court and Coroner’s court – and the higher criminal courts – the District Court and the Supreme Court. In observing proceedings at the Local, District and Supreme Courts over a period of three days a number of aspects of the criminal justice system were made apparent. The administration, processes and practices of the criminal trial are extremely varied dependent upon the level of criminal court being observed. The distinctions between the workings of the two courts revealed a number of the differences between summary proceedings and trial upon indictment. The cases observed served to provide evidence for the “two tiers of justice” argument. Also the role of the judiciary was perceived as being particularly interesting especially the high level of discretion that they held in the Local Courts and even to an extent in the District Court primarily when there was no jury present.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Repot

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages

    roles. The Judge looks over the case and in the system is seen to be an…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Criminal Trial Process

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Each court has its own jurisdiction or area over which it has authority to hear matters. Minor matters such as summary offences are dealt with lower in the court hierarchy; the higher courts are reserved for more serious matters, indictable offences and appeals from the lower courts.…

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trial Process

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The criminal trial process is a vital part of the criminal justice system in NSW as it plays a fundamental role in achieving justice, by determining the innocence or guilt of an offender. Yet, despite the criminal trial process still having many complex issues that remove it of achieving its full means of justice, the process has stood the test of time and lasted for more than two centuries. It aims at lawfully and justly providing victims, offenders and society with the rights of a fair trial. The hierarchies of courts play a crucial role in effectuating justice for the community. The courts jurisdiction is the extent of the court’s authority and is often determined by the hierarchy. The lowest form of court is the Local Court. The Local Court Act 1982 (NSW) outlines the offences that are heard in this court. They are less serious crimes, where matters are tried summarily, but are also the location for bail and committal hearings, where police play a prominent role in achieving justice. The Intermediate and High Courts handle indictable crimes as well as appeals from lower courts. It is in these courts that a decision made sets a doctrine of precedent. The court hierarchy is a major part of the criminal trial process as it allows appeals and precedents to flow easily. It attempts to ensure consistency between judicial decisions, as well as limit the discretion on most judicial verdicts. Appeals and precedents fundamentally ensure efficiency and the effectiveness of achieving justice, but despite them being an effective measure in achieving justice, there are still cheaper and more cost-efficient methods, such as YJC, and Circle Sentencing, that can fulfill the same outcome. The cornerstone of Australia’s criminal trial process is the Adversary System. This refers to the legal procedure where two opposing sides argue a case before an independent, third party eg.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fusion Fallacy

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Prior to the enactment of the Judicature Act 1873, the administration of common law and equity was completely separated. The principles of equity developed in the Court of the Chancery where a ‘petitioner could seek relief from the harsh or unjust operation of the law’.[3] The Chancery Court was a court of conscience charged with ‘an extraordinary power to prevent the injustices and supply the deficiencies that were perceived in the operation of the Common Law’.[4] The disadvantage of this system was that courts of law refused to recognise equitable rights or interests. The Judicature Act 1873 was enacted in order to merge the administration of law and equity. The effect of the Act was the abolition of the old courts and the creation of a new High Court of Justice that combined the jurisdiction of the old courts.[5] The judicature system was implemented in WA by enacting in the Supreme Court Act 1880 (WA) provisions equivalent to the Act. These provisions are now located in sections 16(1), 24 and 25 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA).…

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The successful completion of this project was a unique interacting various person, achieved a better knowledge about sales. The experienced which I gained by doing this project was essential at this turning point of my carrier this project is being submitted which content detailed analysis if the research under taken be me.…

    • 9714 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Micro Food In Sweetpotato

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sweetpotato (Ipomea batatas) is considered a staple crop in many considerable parts of Africa. According to FAOSTAT (2013), sweet potato has been considered as the seventh important food crop in the world. Agriculture has become more market oriented and sweetpotato is one of the many crops that help farmers obtain income and subsistence food security (Wheatly and Loechl, 2008). Sweetpotato are mainly eaten as staple food, consumed directly from the farm in a subsistence economy across the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The roots are consumed usually steamed, boiled or mashed and roasted, while the vines are eaten as vegetables in various places.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics