Should Caesar Be The Official Title Of Emperor?

Many people to this day still argue about whether “Dictator for Life” Julius Caesar should have been given the official title of emperor. Some believe that Caesar was already in complete power while others believe that he was not, and that he was too self-centered to focus on actually ruling Rome. In ancient Roman society, the common people, known as the plebians, had little to no power. They had no role in politics or government because important roles like those were reserved for the rich people, or the patricians. The common people were looking for someone to speak for them because the people in power were only concerned with themselves. This may be where Caesar saw an opportunity to gain power. If he spoke up for the common people, he would gain a large quantity of supporters who would stand by him.
This makes it questionable as to how such a physically weak man at times ended up with so much power. Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus formed an alliance called the First Triumvirate which dominated politics in Rome. This alliance is how Caesar rose to power despite his weakness. From there, he continued to gain power in the military and the government. To say he was a strong leader is an understatement. He never lost a battle. Caesar often donated a lot of money to provide entertainment and employment opportunities for the poor which is why he was so well liked by them. For the same reason, he was disliked by rich politicians because they thought he was trying to steal power solely for himself. When Caesar was killed in 44 BCE, the plebians were distraught because he had been so helpful to them. The patricians, however, and surely the men that killed him were overjoyed because they saw his death as the return of freedom to