One of Americans’ favorite pastime activities has been watching or participating in college athletics. College athletics have always been something more pure and interesting than professional athletics because it isn’t about the money. However, over the years, college athletics have changed for the worse, as players have been drifting further away, core reason being lack of funds for the players (Eric, p. 250). This has led to the call for reforms in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) decision against payments for student-athletes. College athletes deserve to be paid due to a number of reasons. To begin with, the athletes happen to be the ones responsible for the huge sums of revenue that universities receive from the college athletic competitions (Jonathan, p. 1). The rise in popularity of sports in the American society, coupled with its high profit margin for the colleges due to commercialization has led to creation of much revenue for the universities. It is however very unfortunate that the student-athletes responsible for this, end up without even a penny of the revenue that they helped bring forth. There have also been contracts worth billions of dollars being signed between the universities and various broadcasting stations but the colleges still end up not paying the students. This can be better described as capitalism due to its lop-sided nature where the student-athletes do their best to aid in revenue creation for their universities but get nothing out of it. Others may argue the students get paid indirectly by being offered scholarships to be able to obtain their degrees in various fields of study. However, there is the question of; does this compensation help them out with their student loans. Or even enable them to comfortably partake in money-related activities? The answer still remains “No!” The student-athletes have to juggle their tight academic schedules, fixed training sessions and undertake their home-related activities all at once. This leaves them with very little or no time to seek an income-generating job like other college students. The student-athletes spend most of their free and available time participating in activities related to their respective sports. For instance, football players will either be working out in private gyms, training with fellow teammates or even educating others about the sport. Student-athletes commit much of their time to sports related activities. Currently, making the payment of student-athletes into a reality may be a difficult if not an impossible task (Lesly, p. 1). This is due to the many economic and legal hurdles that prevent this from happening anytime soon. Though the funds from ticket sales and television broadcasting may bring in millions in revenue, these funds would never be enough to cover the costs of the different departments. Most sports are aired on national television, giving the student-athletes even more of an incentive to perform at their highest possible level. Very few college-athletes end up turning pro in their sport even though the amount exposure and the massive viewing they get in college, but yet this still attracts many fans and future athletes as well. Apart from the economic reasons, it is not clear where to draw the line in payment of the student-athletes. Will it be the football players, tennis players or basketball players who will be paid more? Not all the sports bring in huge amounts of revenue for the university, but all the students spend their precious time to represent their colleges. It was once considered that athletics is young men and women competing, sweating, bleeding and learning game; a concept that no one wishes to change or alter. If anything, it should be added that athletics help in interaction and better understanding of people according to the Greek. It would however be fair and prudent if the student-athletes had a piece of what comes out of their own sweat and blood literally. This does not mean advocating for payment of the student-athletes like professionals, but rather a payment of the athletes as sign of gratitude and financial compensation.
Work Cited
Chait, Jonathan. “Fixing College Sports: Why Paying Student Athletes Won’t Work”. New York Sports. n. d. Web. 1 Nov 2012.
Sobocinski, Eric. “College Athletes: What is Fair Compensation” 7 (2010): 250-256
Ryder, Lesly. “Don’t Pay College Athletes. Huff Post. Web. 1 Nov 2012.
James, Brown. “Paying College Athletes." StudyMode.com. 12 2007. Web. 1 Nov 2012
Cited: Chait, Jonathan. “Fixing College Sports: Why Paying Student Athletes Won’t Work”. New York Sports. n. d. Web. 1 Nov 2012. Sobocinski, Eric. “College Athletes: What is Fair Compensation” 7 (2010): 250-256 Ryder, Lesly. “Don’t Pay College Athletes. Huff Post. Web. 1 Nov 2012. James, Brown. “Paying College Athletes." StudyMode.com. 12 2007. Web. 1 Nov 2012
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
On average, annually D1 Colleges are earning 50 million dollars across all sports in the schools. All of the D1 schools are making a great deal of money off these stellar athletes and they are receiving very minimal in return. On the other hand, if D1 colleges decide to pay their athletes how could this affect the other programs in the school? This is where the discourse begins on whether we should pay the college athletes, or is a scholarship more than content for the student. As a result of this dispute it can cause humongous outrages from angry parents and fans of certain teams.…
- 704 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After doing some research over a year ago and taking another look at this issue now, the question about paying college athletes has stayed the same. The debate whether to pay college athletes or not arose in the 1980s after Southern Methodist University was caught paying football players for their services. Upon discovery of these infractions, SMU was administered the “death penalty”, including loss of scholarships and no participation in bowl games for five years. The controversy surrounding paying college athletes seems to have risen from this unfortunate circumstance and has been cultivated into a huge social topic today. Following the SMU scandal in the late 1980s the NCAA rewrote their guidebook that describes an athlete’s role in an academic institution. According to the NCAA, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (NCAA.com). Looking at the arguments made by the NCAA, they make a valid point in showing how athletes are “compensated” for their participation in sports. According to the NCAA, “Many [athletes] receive athletics grants-in-aid that can be…
- 784 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Some colleges make more money than others. This graph shows the schools with the most profit in their sports programs. Somebody could say that the athletes bring in an enormous amount of money. According to Jeff Dorfman, a professor of Economics at the University of Georgia, only a few collegiate sports actually bring in money. Therefore, an athlete in a sport that isn’t very profitable wouldn’t make nearly get as much as an athlete in a very profitable sport. Along with the sports being very profitable they also have to pay for an even larger variety of different things. Student athletes should not be paid because of the money that would be paid to them. The money that they would be paid could be used to advance other things in the university such as better libraries, science labs, fixing up the dorms, or even improving their athletic facilities. Although the athletes put a lot of time into their schooling and sports the benefits they are given is equal to what they are giving and being…
- 840 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The debate about whether or not college athletes should be paid has been an ongoing discussion. In my essay, I will be analyzing the various perspectives as to why college athletes should be paid by participating in collegiate sports. Athletes and many others may argue that the hard work and dedication put into…
- 1923 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The notion of paying college athletes has been an ongoing and controversial debate for student-athletes, coaches, schools, media and most certainly the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Many would argue that playing major college sports is more like a job versus an extracurricular activity. As with the majority of many student athletes, some attend college with the aspiration of becoming professional players thereby college is seen as a means to end. Although student-athletes already receive compensation via full and partial scholarships to participate at the college level, passionate conversations will continue to be a topic of debate because of the enormous revenue generated by college sports.…
- 3400 Words
- 14 Pages
Best Essays -
We often look at college athletes as miniature stars. The question is, why should student’s athlete get a paycheck for playing amateur level sports? Athletes complain about how they do not get enough for playing a sport. They are forgetting that they are being rewarded with a half or full scholarship. The main goal for these athletes is being academically successful. Not who has the best jump shot or who fumbled a ball, that does not matter. The essence of playing college level has been taken out of place, now replaced with the mindsets of professional athletes. Did they forget? You are not professionals. The love of the game has been through extortion for the love of money. Paying college athletes will lead the students astray from what they attended the institution to accomplish in the first place, that is, to earn a degree, not to gain a compensation.…
- 748 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Fairness, academics and equitable competition” is the mission statement for the National Collegiate Athletic Association. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, also known as the NCAA, is an association that regulates major areas of college athletics for members and student athletes. The organization is defined as a non-profit, and as proclaimed by the president Dr. Mark A. Emmert, “…is committed to providing opportunity for more than 430,000 college students who compete annually in intercollegiate athletics” (NCAA). Recently the NCAA published their financial report for the 2011-2012 fiscal years. The report features a pie chart displaying a revenue breakdown, and distribution of revenue breakdown. I will examine the economic impact in these categories and consider how a possible change in distribution of the revenue to players affects the NCAA purpose and amateurism of the sport.…
- 804 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
College football and men’s basketball generate revenues of more than $6 billion dollars every year. Yet these college athletes, who make this possible, don’t even get a little piece of that money. It only makes sense that since they contribute to the NCAA making all this profit, that they should get a reward for making these sports possible. Many of these athletes do get scholarships, but these scholarships usually do not even cover their tuition. Some of these athletes may have financial problems, and with a little help from the NCAA, they can pay for their tuition and not have to worry about money and focus on their school and athletics (Birkenes).…
- 1046 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
“The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million,” (Mitchell & Edelman). The money collected by the NCAA, goes towards the sports and the programs, not the players themselves, however, the NCAA says that “Student-athletes are at the heart of the NCAA’s mission,” (NCAA). “Some athletes and their supporters believe that college athletes deserve some type of financial payment for their services and contributions to their institutions, an opinion that has lead to player-initiated lawsuits, court cases, and strikes,” (Garcia).…
- 1189 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
They are college students who are a part of a sports team, something they chose. By paying athletes they turn into employees. “Among paying programs, academic expectations will diminish- if not disappear- as athletes morph into full-time W-2 employees and part-time (at most) students” (Magee). If the students are being paid they will more than likely be forced to spend more time with their sport. Therefore, the time they would spend on academics would diminish. Which is a problem because college athletes already undertake a simplified course load. These classes are called paper classes which only involve writing one paper at the end of the semester (Neuhauser). Academics are clearly not the priority for most college athletes already. By paying them colleges would expect even less work. Athletes choose to participate in their sport while in college. Although being a college athlete is comparable to having a full time job, that is what student-athletes sign up for (Widener). If students feel as though the course load is too much they should simply stop playing the sport. School and academics should be the main focus for student athletes. The only solution to insuring the fact that athletics come first is to separate them. If students go to college, academics should be the priority. Paying the athletes would only push the idea of students being employees rather than students.…
- 1337 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
College athletics is a billion-dollar industry with revenue generated from hard-working, unpaid athletes. A college sport competition, such as football, basketball, and baseball, can be found on the television, radio, and Internet, almost every day. Intercollegiate athletics generate amazing ratings and revenue for both the media and universities due to their immense popularity in the United States. College athletics are big business and big money. In spite of this, the topic of paying college athletes is an extremely controversial topic.…
- 1265 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Student athletes should be compensated for their work, as they are the sole reason for the Athletic Program’s surplus in revenue. These athletes are working for the schools and are doing a service to the college that seems to go unnoticed. Colleges are using these athletes to boost their respective reputations and bring in revenue while not compensating these athletes for their work. Everywhere else athletes are paid, so why shouldn’t college students too? Some critics may argue that these student-athletes are amateurs, and if paid then are becoming professional athletes. The minor league for baseball could be considered an amateur sport, although they do receive pay according to the team’s revenue.…
- 872 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There has been a constant debate the past few years on whether college athletes, particularly football players, should get paid. In 1988, the Nebraska legislature passed a bill that would allow the University of Nebraska football players to receive better cash incentives. The bill was later vetoed by Governor Kay Orr, who was governor of Nebraska at the time (O'Toole etal. 2). . The dispute comes from coaches, parents of the players, and the players themselves arguing that universities make money off their own athletes and the athletes, in turn, do not receive any money from that. Many NCAA officials disagree stating their case that college athletes already receive enough money through scholarships and other financial aids, such as Pell Grants and other government aids. Although there are many positive sides to each story, the following paragraphs will examine why college athletes should be paid.…
- 862 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Playing a college sport is like a full time job, except the lack of financial benefits. College football and men’s basketball generate revenue of more than $6 billion every year, yet no money goes toward paying the people that make the sports possible (Bagaria). College sports would be non-existent without the devoted athletes who work hard and spend countless hours each and every day. Whether practicing, training, or playing in games, these athletes are involved in their sport all seven days of the week. College athletes put in almost the same amount of work as professional players do, but instead of making millions, rather they are receiving no financial benefits (Bagaria). College athletes deserve to be paid because they sacrifice so much for their team and deserve compensation. Secondly, college athletes not only deserve money because of their devotion, they also need it for their everyday life. During their athletic season, they do not receive any sort of payment for their efforts which would aide them financially and in everyday life (Bagaria). Most scholarships cover cost of housing and textbooks, but leave out basics such as food. Logically athletes need food, but their time and energy is spent on a “job” as an athlete…
- 812 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In college, sports sometime become the facade of the university and or college. In return, the universities drastic rise in popularity comes from their sports programs. Ultimately, studies have shown student athletes put in more effort on the field or court than they do in the classroom. Therefore college student athletes should be paid for playing their sport while attending school. Many people say that college athletes should not be paid because college tuition, fees, rooms, and textbooks.…
- 799 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays