Preview

Should Creationism or Evolutionism Be Taught in Public Schools?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
687 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Creationism or Evolutionism Be Taught in Public Schools?
Should creationism or evolutionism be taught in public schools?

"It appears that some school officials, teachers, and parents have assumed that religious expression of any type is either inappropriate or forbidden altogether in public schools; however, nothing in the First Amendment converts our public schools into religion-free zones" - Bill Clinton. Although, public schools are meant to be religion free sometimes the topic of creationism is brought up and it causes many problems. The main problem is that creationism is religiously based therefore, students feel offended because of their religion. Students and teachers should never be able to discuss religious topics because it interferes with the First Amendment. Although, both evolutionism and creationism are theories, evolution should always be taught mainly while creationism only mentioned.

In the Scopes trial, in 1928, the court decided that evolutionism should be banned from the school curriculum but creationism should be taught. However, in 1968 in Epperson v. Arkansas, Susan Epperson taught evolution in science class, this directly violated a statute of Arkansas that did not allow evolutionism to be taught. Even though Arkansas pleaded that the statute be kept as is, the Supreme Court decided that it was unconstitutional for a religious based theory, creationism, to be taught in a public school. However, the Supreme Court should not have allowed the state of Arkansas to put a statute in action which violated the First Amendment, the right to freedom of religion along with other rights.

The case Edwards vs. Aguillard was when Louisiana established a statute similar to that of Arkansas ' but, it also stated that the theory of evolution could be taught if the teacher also included the theory of "creationism science". The Supreme Court found this to violate the First Amendment clause because creationism science is a theory with a religious view. Secondly,



Cited: “Epperson v. Arkansas.” Cornell University Law School. 8 Apr. 2009 . “Intelligent Design on Trial: Kitzmiller v. Dover.” National Center for Science Education. 14 Apr. 2009 . "Edwards v. Aguillard." Cornell University Law School. 14 Apr. 2009 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pennsylvania and Rhode Island had statutes that allowed the state to pay for parts of non-secular, non-public education such as teachers instructional materials, salaries, and textbooks for religious subjects. The appellants in Pennsylvania believed that this was violating the separation of church and state described in the First Amendment. In the Rhode Island case, the appellees sued to have the statute in question declared unconstitutional by arguing that it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The district court found in favor of the appellees and held that the statute violated the First Amendment.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eight of the nine Justices voted against Abington School District and one Justice, Stewart, voted for Abington School District. The Court voted against the defendant because they believed that the readings that took place were basically religious ceremonies and therefore had violated the Free Exercise Clause, Establishment Clause, and the First Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Clark then went on to say that although it is obvious the Founding Fathers were predominately religious and that many of the ideals America was found upon are based on Christianity, America was intended to be a place of equality and freedom of all things, including religion. He also said that even though children could be excused it was "irrelevant" because it did not stop the schools from violating the Establishment…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Bethel School District v. Fraser a lot happened. In my understanding there was a school event in which students gave speeches. The one student gave a speech with language unaccepted in the school, and got suspended, and was not allowed to be voted in for the election. The Father got angry and believed that his sons amendment rights were being violated. He felt like his sons first amendment right of freedom of speech was being withheld from him, along with his fourteenth amendment right. The case first went to a general court and it could not be agreed upon, so in tern it went to the Supreme Court because it could not be agreed upon in the lower court system and was to controversial. The court case was taken extremely seriously because it could change school rights, as they were known.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier is a very interesting case because it requires the courts to balance two very important values of American society, freedom of speech and education. Many Americans have made countless sacrifices to ensure that we can enjoy both freedom of speech and one of the best education systems in the world. Due to the fact that these values are so important to the American people, it is no surprise that the decision had to be ultimately made by the Supreme Court of the United States. It is also not surprising that due to the nature of the case, the Appeals Court had a different decision than both the District Court of Missouri and the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Although I find merit in the dissenting…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 201 Quiz

    • 3103 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Judges espousing a philosophy of original understanding maintain that school desegregation cases decided on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment were wrongly decided…

    • 3103 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court considered the Lemon v. Kurtzman case simultaneously with two additional Rhode Island cases. After the Court reviewed the two state acts, Lemon argued that the Nonpublic Elementary and Secondary Education Act violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, claiming that such funding required an intimate relationship between the church and the state. In contrast, Kurtzman defended the constitutionality of the act, stating that refusal to fund the religious schools would be a violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Engal V Vitale is the supreme court decision involving Steven Engel and William Vitale. It was decided on June 25,1962. This case was about mandatory prayer was aloud in school systems. It was ruled unethical under the first amendment because of freedom of religion. This case is important because it’s a precedent for separation of church and state being that education falls under state. I am interested in this case because I went to a catholic school where prayer was required as a part of the curriculum and I’m interested in the rules in the public school system. (Engal V. Vitale, Wikipedia)…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scope Trial Simulation.

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We the defense, believe our client is innocent. Why you might ask, becuase no law was ever broken.According to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion and what does this The Butler Act do? It outlawed in state-funded schools, including universities, the teaching of "any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible." So John T. Scope never broke a law. The one who should be here instead is Austin Peay for signing a piece of state legislation that was violating the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The first amedment granted freedom of expression giving Scopes the right to teach evolution and also granted freedom of religion giving Scopes the right to believe in anything he wants. The state requires teachers to use a textbook, Hunter's Civic Biology, which explicitly describes and endorses the theory of evolution, and that teachers were therefore effectively requires Scope to break the law.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the infamous Scopes Trial of 1926. Twenty-four year old high school teacher John Thomas Scopes of Dayton, Tennessee decided to test a law called the Butler Act. Many teachers felt that honor and academic freedom along with the separation of church and state were at risk. In y 1925 Scopes was accused of teaching Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution to his class which violated the Butler Act of 1925. Scopes was provoked by the American Civil Union Act because of their promise to pay for the defense of anyone willing to violate the Butler Act. The trial brought upon two outstanding lawyers of the time, William Jennings Bryan (three-time Democratic candidate for President and a populist) in prosecution and Clarence Darrow (leading member of American Civil Liberties Union and famous for world renown criminal defense) in defense. It was believed by most scientists that biology could not be taught without making some sort of reference to the theory of evolution, but being that the people of Tennessee were such strong believers of the bible, many of the Christian Fundamentalist saw that the theory of evolution denied their religious beliefs. This trial was definitely a conflict between religion and science; hence the people of Tennessee were gravely angered by the teachings of Darwin’s theory because it contradicted the creation of man that was stated in the bible. This case was a watershed in this religion-science conflict that eventually led to three major following the trial: The Butler Act was discontinued, the Scopes Trial upheld defeat of religion over science, and the trial reflected the social conflict that took place in the American Society during the 1920s.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scopes Trial Essay Example

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Scopes Trial was the Tennessee legal case involving the teaching of evolution in public schools. A statute was passed (Mar., 1925) in Tennessee that prohibited the teaching in public schools of theories contrary to accepted interpretation of the biblical account of human creation. John T. Scopes, a biology teacher, was tried (July, 1925) for teaching Darwinism in a Dayton, Tenn., public school. Clarence Darrow was one of Scopes's attorneys. Darrow argued that academic freedom was being violated and claimed that the legislature had indicated a religious preference, violating the separation of church and state. He also maintained that the evolutionary theory was consistent with certain interpretations of the Bible, and in an especially dramatic session he sharply questioned Bryan on the latter's literal interpretation. Scopes was convicted, partly because of the defense, which refused to plead any of the technical defenses available, fearing an acquittal on a technical rather than a constitutional basis. Scopes was, however, later released by the state supreme court on a technicality. Although the outcry over the case tended to discourage enactment of similar legislation in other states, the law was not repealed until 1967. William Jennings Bryan, three-time Democratic candidate for President and a populist, led a Fundamentalist crusade to banish Darwin's theory of evolution from American classrooms. Bryan's motivation for mounting the crusade is unclear. It is possible that Bryan, who cared deeply about equality, worried that Darwin's theories were being used by supporters of a growing eugenics movement that was advocating sterilization of "inferior stock." More likely, the Great Commoner came to his cause both out a concern that the teaching of evolution would undermine traditional values he had long supported and because he had a compelling desire to remain in the public spotlight--a spotlight he had occupied since his famous "Cross of Gold" speech at the…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scopes Trial

    • 254 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Scopes Monkey Trial was perhaps one of the most famous trials in our history. John Scopes was a high school teacher in Dayton, Tennessee, and was arrested because he was teaching the theory of evolution in his high school biology class. During the 1920’s it was against the law to teach anything other than the theory of creation as written in the Bible. These laws were a result of a strong fundamentalist movements spreading throughout the United States. In 1925 the American Civil Liberties Union volunteered to defend any teacher willing to challenge these laws concerning the teaching evolution. John Scopes agreed to their challenge, and after teaching Darwin’s theory of evolution. Scopes arrest duly followed.…

    • 254 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In July of 1925, John Thomas Scopes was put on trial in Tennessee for violating the Butler Act, which was a state law that prohibited evolution to be taught in state-funded schools. By using texts from famous scientists like Charles Darwin and new sources of literature from “Modernists,” which were people who claimed that evolution could be consistent with the bible, Scopes taught his students the theory of evolution. Due to the theory “challenging Christian faith,” Scopes was quickly dismissed from his teaching position, put on trial in Dayton, Tennessee, and fined $100. Even though Scopes was embarrassed and disheartened, he disagreed with the state’s ruling and had the verdict overturned due to the technicality that claimed it was not “science,” but it was part of a philosophical discussion. A few years after the incident, an Englishman named…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scopes Trial is one of the most known trials in American history. It is one of the most known because it is the perfect example of the conflict between science and religion. In the summer of 1925, a high school biology teacher named John Scopes was on trial in Dayton, Tennessee for violating the law against the teaching of evolution. The prosecutor was a very famous attorney named William Jennings Bryan, who was a three-time Democratic presidential nominee. Clarence Darrow, who was agnostic, represented the defense. The American Civil Liberties Union had newspaper advertisements offering to defend anyone who violated the law. George Rappelyea, a Dayton booster, realized that the town would get an enormous amount of attention if a teacher…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scopes and a group of civic leaders to test the Butler Act, a law prohibiting teachers from teaching evolution in the state of Tennessee. Scopes would be the defendant, and would be arrested for teaching Darwin’s theory of evolution at the Dayton high school. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) had issued a challenge to any Tennessee teacher willing to defy the act, and vowed to represent him or her should they choose to accept the task set forth. Rappleyea anticipated that the trial would bring news coverage and national attention. The men wanted to put Dayton on the map, and bring more attention to their small corner of the world.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court held that “The Fourteenth Amendment is inconclusive as to its intended effect on public education,” (4). Thus, the cases presented “must be determined, not on the basis of conditions existing when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted, but in the light of the full development of public education and its present place in American life,” (4). By viewing the Fourteenth Amendment as such, the court interpreted it as protecting student’s rights to an equal education. Under this interpretation, the previous idea of ‘inherently equal’ no longer applied.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays