I think direct democracy should be more widely used in the UK however there are also disadvantages of direct democracy and critiquing of the advantages and disadvantages.
Direct democracy should be used more widely in the UK because it avoids decisions made by representatives in their own interest. This is because the people are making the decisions. This will be beneficial because people’s voices will be heard and represented as a society. This makes it that decisions are made through societies interest. However this can be critiqued because some societies may make very stupid and unfair decisions also this ruins the purpose of having a government and other type of politicians.
Another reason is because there is disillusionment with representative parties, so the people prefer to make their own decisions. This will get rid of a lot of the disillusionment with representative parties. Which will therefore make decisions easier and quicker to be made however we could critique it might actually make it slower because instead of dealing with parties we are dealing with the whole of society and it will also be expensive to carry out.
Another reason is that it is the more legitimate answer of what the people want. It is the more legitimate answer of what the people want because the minority have a say. This is beneficial because if direct democracy was not used than in the minority would not have a say at all, only the higher class and politicians have a say. This point can be critiqued because during elections everyone is equal and has the same amount of political power and the same amount of say in things.
Finally peoples intelligence is increasing, there are more educated people therefore they can make the ‘right decisions’. With these intelligent people and their right decisions it can bring changes that will benefit the UK. This is better than only having a few political minds assisting the country. It will mean that people from many different areas within the UK can get the change they want. However I can critique this point because if people are becoming more intelligent than they themselves can try to become politicians instead of just being a norm in society.
Overall I conclude that direct democracy should be more widely used in the UK due to some of the advantages I gave, The advantages outweigh the critiques. UK will develop way faster and better changes to society will occur due to direct democracy.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Another criticism is that there are many wasted votes when using this system. To revert back to the UKIP example, nearly one million votes were wasted on UKIP, who didn’t win a single seat, perhaps leading the voters to think that their votes are useless and have no effect. This could be the reason for the continually decreasing turnout at the general elections. Another reason for people not turning out to votes is the ‘safe seats’. It is estimated that there are around 500 ‘safe’ seats within the UK, meaning that the same party will always win a seat in those constituencies. Voters in this area resultantly are less likely to vote as they know their vote is unimportant and will not affect the overall outcome. Thus, we can see that if one is going to look at proportionality, FPTP is not fair.…
- 1568 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
There are three main reasons to show why there is a participation crisis in the UK. The first reason is the public. Due to people’s interest in materialism, individualism and lack of community, citizens fail to pull together and look out for each other, which decreases the interest and connection they have in politics. Decreasing rates in party membership and electoral turnouts is part of a process that’s seen less interest in political affairs as citizens seem to care more about themselves and family rather than their neighbours and society as a whole.…
- 1234 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Although it’s good to have a large amount of the public excited to input their views into political matters, there is the issue that the people of the public lack specialized knowledge, and can be easily swayed by the government. This is not very democratic and therefore would not improve democracy in the UK. The 1975 EEC referendum asked a question phrased in a way that would make the people give the answer that the government wanted, and this is not a true representation of the views of the public.…
- 941 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
First, there are two types of democracies direct and representatives. “ A direct democracy has no representatives and the citizens are involved in the day-to-day work of governing the country “. And a representative democracy is “ citizens who elect leaders to represent their rights and interest in government “. A direct democracy is different from a representative democracy because in representatives democracy the citizens hold the ultimate power, but there are no kinds of representatives, unlike a direct democracy.…
- 329 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Direct or participatory democracy – a political system in which all or most citizens participate directly by either holing office or making policy. The town meeting, in which citizens vote on major issues, is an example of participatory democracy.…
- 20135 Words
- 81 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The most telling indicator of there being a democratic deficit in the UK today is the continuing decline of voter turnout at all elections for the past 60 years. There is a growing level of general apathy towards political issues in the UK which is not just damaging to the health of a democracy but fatal. The government requires a mandate to govern, if they do not achieve popular consent then how are they representative of the people?…
- 1559 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live. The generally accepted definition of a democracy is a form of government in which the major decisions of government and the direction of policy behind these decisions - rests directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of the freely given consent of the freely majority of the adults government. There are two forms of democracy but the UK is run through an indirect or representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy, which relies on referendums and would be difficult in a large, modern society. Furthermore, the UK is a parliamentary democracy, the government and representatives are intermingled meaning that the UK does not have separation of powers, meaning that the executive, legislative and judicial courts all work together unlike the American Presidential system which could create a lack in communication. In this essay, I propose to argue both for and against and eventually come to a conclusion whether the UK is democratic or not and give a comparison between the UK and the US in terms of democracy.…
- 932 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A referendum is supposed to be enhancing democracy in the UK however they undermine our system of representative democracy, where candidates are elected to make decisions on behalf of their constituency. These candidates have a good understanding of politics and are elected to make decisions with the constituent’s best interests in heart. They are used, as most people in the UK do not have the political knowledge and understanding to make these important decisions. They are less likely to have access to key arguments and information than elected, full-time politicians. Furthermore in seeking a majority vote, referendums may undermine the rights of the minorities that are generally well protected by constitutions and judiciaries within representative democracies. They are detraction in a representative system of democracy and as such they surrender power of experts to the masses.…
- 1040 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Referendums could help promote direct democracy, as referendums help the distinction of clear ideas and policies, there can be no distortion from the government over policies. Additionally, the outcome of referendums can make the political decisions made legitimate. An example of referendums promoting direct democracy could be the 1998 Northern Ireland referendum, “The Good Friday Agreement” where 71.1% of the voters voted yes, as to whether Northern Ireland should become independent.…
- 671 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Secondly, First Past The Post has had a big impact on UK democracy. The system we use to elect our MPs has a real impact on how politics works in Britain. It has a direct effect on whether politicians truly represent us and whether we can hold them to account if they let us down. The defeat of the 2011 Alternative Vote (AV) referendum means it is now more important than ever to discredit our failed system and we are continuing to build the case for change at Westminster. This in turn means any of our votes just don’t count. Millions of people have no chance of deciding who their MP will be. And our votes are wasted by the system. Additionally, parties continue to focus all their time, money and effort on a handful of 'marginal seats', so just a few thousand voters can decide who runs Britain.…
- 752 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
However, I must disagree with Mr. Tocqueville due to the fact that a democracy has more benefits than an aristocracy. There are two types of democracy: direct and indirect. A direct democracy means that everyone has a vote and a say. An…
- 397 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The state of Georgia utilizes recall and legislature. In direct democracy, people become more involved with politics, and have greater power speaking their own opinions which can improve democracy. Direct democracy can be good by serving the people that take part in it, but it has it’s downfalls as well. Although, people in the community come together, direct democracy in my opinion grants people in the community too much power. This can lead to a disadvantage in direct democracy by causing potential harm to minority groups. This system set to where citizens have direct power in decision making. It’s evident that minority groups have less power it’s like the wealthy versus the poor. Case in point, according to the text the battle over illegal…
- 204 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
There are pros and cons to this way of democracy. The major advantage to this way of government is that there would not be a popular vote on the issue by citizens who have not educated themselves on the issue. For example, if a tax on guns required…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The theory behind direct democracy seems to fit what the American people want exactly. The people have a direct say on things that will affect their government, such as amendments and laws (Reilly 6). In America, people use initiatives, recalls, and referenda to make their opinions heard by the government. This is a good thing in the eyes of many Americans because it means the people have more of a voice in the government then they usually would have. It also means that the government has…
- 528 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Democracy, by far, is viewed as being a much more equal, reliable and honest form of government organisation, to comparison with a monarchy or a dictatorship, where the individuals of a state have very little or no say at all to the ruling and management of their country.…
- 1304 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays