Preview

To What Extent Would the Wide Use of Referendums Improve Democracy in the UK?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
941 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Would the Wide Use of Referendums Improve Democracy in the UK?
To What Extent Would the Wide Use of Referendums Improve Democracy in the UK?

The wide use of referendums would make an improvement to democracy in the UK. A reason why it would be so beneficial is that referendums highly encourage political participation. Over recent years, political participation has not been at it’s highest, with people expecting a mere 55% turnout at the next vote, referendums could be just what are required to engage the public in politics. The Good Friday referendum is an example of referendums improving democracy. With an 81.1% turnout in a country where voting is not even mandatory, referendums make the public feel they should educate themselves on the matter because their view is required and important. Although it’s good to have a large amount of the public excited to input their views into political matters, there is the issue that the people of the public lack specialized knowledge, and can be easily swayed by the government. This is not very democratic and therefore would not improve democracy in the UK. The 1975 EEC referendum asked a question phrased in a way that would make the people give the answer that the government wanted, and this is not a true representation of the views of the public. Referendums cause the public to become more educated and engaged, which would help the UK to become more democratic. For example, the Scottish referendum scheduled to take place next year has already started campaigning, with their “Yes, Scotland” campaign. Through activities like campaigning, the government can engage the public and they then become more educated about it. Referendums can be exciting and engaging, but sometimes other means can influence and bias voters, as they are only people, so their true beliefs aren’t represented and then the whole referendum was pointless. For example, during the Northern Ireland Sovereignty Referendum, the leader of the SDLP organised a boycott and told the members to ignore the referendum.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Frank Brennan’s informative book No Small Change: The Road to Recognition essentially looks at the prospect of potentially having a renewed referendum. Looking back at 1967, and the staggering amount of public support to both eliminate discrimination against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and to include Aborigines as part of the census, in essence ushered rudimentary human rights laws. That being said, Brennan observes the same opportunity to further the constitutions ongoing faults, issuing his respected opinion on how the country can push forward by delving into our failures and using them as a means of improvement. Though the prospect of a new referendum may seem far reaching on the outlook,…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 13 Vocabulary

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    20. Referendum- A vote used to determine whether to keep, alter, or make void a law or constitutional amendment in which an entire electorate marks a ballot to either accept or reject a proposal.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To what extent does democracy in the UK suffer from a participation crisis? (25 marks)…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate how democratic in practice, initiatives and referendums are in making public policy. (30 marks)…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a many ways in which citizens can participate in politics in the UK without necessarily having to vote for example: joining a political party, boycotting, and even signing petitions and fund raising. All of these methods provide political involvement without a democratic vote being placed. Participation in marches has increased recently as more people see the effects of this form of involvement in politics. However, there is an argument that there has been a participation crisis over the past years in the UK. A participation crisis is when less and less citizens take part in political activities; this can be shown in the decrease of voter turnout and the level of participation. This is in some ways a crisis as it means that some people within the population will not be represented by a vote, and so may not be politically catered for. This would lead to some citizens being favoured in politics as they actually affect who is in power with their vote. On the other hand, there is an argument that there is in fact not a participation crisis because the turnout of voting is increasing and specific forms of participation are also on the rise.The main concern about democracy in the UK comes from evidence of rising political apathy. Some people have seen this as nothing more than a ‘participation crisis’ Political Apathy is the lack of caring or strong emotions linked to politics. Politically apathetic people are far less likely to take it upon themselves to vote as they won’t have strong political views for or against any party. Deteriorating rates of voter turnout and falling levels of party membership despite there being opportunities for participation show evidence. There are three main reasons to show why there is a participation crisis in the UK. The first reason is the public. Due to people’s increasing lack of community care, citizens fail to pull together and look out for each other, which decreases the interest and connection they have in politics.…

    • 2196 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referendums are likely to give additional power to pressure groups and other organisations that would seek to influence the outcome. Take the Scottish referendum held two weeks ago. The die hard Scott’s were hugely influencing the rest of the population to vote for independence by using anti-UK propaganda. However if they went independent then Scotland would of faced a gloomy downward spiral. The ‘Yes’ campaigners were voting for an independent Scotland, which was uncertain which currency it was going to use, which had no…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Democratic Is the Uk?

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Democracy is a difficult concept to define, but as a simplification and a conventional definition, it is the people's right to choose and the right to say how the country is run. Democracy falls into many categories and comes in various different forms. One form is when power is in the hands of the population as a whole and political decisions are made themselves, this is known as direct democracy. An example of a direct democracy currently present in the UK is a referendum. Another form is representative democracy; in this case citizens will vote for representatives to create decisions for them and the responsibility is handed over to the representative to make decisions for the country. The representatives are also accountable to the electorate.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Australian Referendum of 1967, called by Prime Minister Harold Holt, led to important and influential decisions and legislations; which ultimately bettered the lives of the first Australians. Although the amendments made to the constitution, were minimal and overall didn't immediately amount to much, it was significant in the progression of the mentality of Australian society. One of the most obvious reasons as to why the referendum still resonates with the people today is that it was the first example of national support for Indigenous Australians. It was also the first time Indigenous Australians were counted, in accordance with state…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referendums are very harmful to a Representative Democracy. They undermine Parliamentary Sovereignty, allow our politicians to abdicate responsibility for major political decisions, prevent them from exercising their informed judgements, and can be manipulated by Governments. This is to say nothing of the premise of allowing important decisions to be made by an uninformed electorate that can be swayed by the Media Industry at the drop of a hat. And indeed, the worst case scenario of Tyranny by Majority is one that should not be disregarded. Of course, Referenda are not entirely harmful. They are useful tools for ensuring that elected Governments do not overstep their boundaries…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 1967 referendum is about including Aboriginals people in the census and allowing the commonwealth to make laws for the aboriginals. At the same time of the referendum, harold Holt was the prime minister and liberal was in power. Before the referendum, there was a question in the census to establish the number of full blood aborigines society viewed aboriginals as a disadvantage. Aboriginal were able to vote in 1962, however they have no potential power and although they are allowed to vote, they are not counted in the census. Australia became more aware of the discrimination and of what other countries think of them and they finally removed the discrimination from federal legislation. At this time, the laws regarding the aboriginal is the responsibility of the states government. Consequently, if an aboriginal moved to another state, their rights might be gained or lost. Furthermore by the end of 1966, aboriginal people has been granted legal rights but not citizenship. A boriginals tried to be counted as Australians and a referendum was done to change the australian convention. A referendum is a voting system, where people vote yes or no to something and a majority of vote will win. Therefore the federal council campaign for a yes vote in the referendumThe context of the referendum is quite good. The aboriginals were hopeful towards the referendum and has faith on getting counted in the census because they successfully gaines the rights to vote in previous times. They believe that their chances of winning this referendum is strong. In addition, the Government also…

    • 736 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Despite its flaws the ‘First past the post’ electoral systems for general elections suits Great Britain”…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due the nation's interest in materialism and individualism, we have gained a certain lack of interest in political matters and affairs – people find politics dull and many people think that it doesn't affect them, this results to certain inhabitants obtaining a 'laissez-faire' attitude toward the government. Nowadays citizens around the UK aren't aware of political dealings; this supports the idea that today's society has become far more materialistic when compared to the previous generations. Many people take the approach that the government can 'do what they want' as the majority of Brits spend their time worrying about getting the next best iPhone etc. The UK has become very divided in the past 20 years due to the generation gap between certain individuals in society. Today's generation of teenagers have become disinterested in the UK's current affairs, this may be down to the fact that they have not been socialised to consider the country's events, which in turn blames the next generation and their lack of interest in how Britain is governed, this has lead to the UK's population becoming far more self aware as opposed to considering others. On the contrary, the elderly people in today's society were raised with slightly different morals and views on how their country was governed. Previous generations deemed voting to be a privilege, something that they had earned – the majority of this generation wouldn't even dream of not voting...out of respect. This highlights how the change in generations has prompted the UK to dive into a participation crisis.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But perhaps referendum votes aren’t the correct way to navigate imperative issues. Citizens elect politicians for a reason- people appoint experts into office with the expectation that they will vote in their constituents best interest. Trust in politicians has grown increasingly low, but even if representative democracy is flawed, it’s the government many countries have, and it functions better than a direct democracy/referendum style government would. Perhaps instead of reforming referendum voting, Washington should focus on improving legislature around politicians and the accountability of trustee voting. America has a constitutional referendum, which gives residents a chance to help set the precedent for morals in their country. In a New York Times article, Richard Ekins explores the necessity of referendum voting, writing, “In general, self-government should be by way of representative institutions. Still, there are times when it is reasonable for the legislature to put some question to the voters themselves for decision by way of a referendum, especially in relation to constitutional change. The constitutional referendum is a legitimate technique of representative democracy.”…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The referendum occurred at a time when Aboriginal activism was accelerating and it was used as kind of historical shorthand for all the relevant political events of the time, such as land right demands and equal pay for pastoral workers. This use as a symbol for a period of activism and change has contributed to the misunderstandings about the effects of the constitutional changes themselves.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the uninformed and uninterested people are forced to vote, the quality of their vote is questionable. “Social scientist have shown that higher quality government tends came high turnout. But high turnout does not cause higher quality government”(Gonchar). The rising amount of runout voters does not means a promotion of the government. “An associate professor of ethics, economics and public policy at Georgetown University who agrees, if we force everyone to vote, the electorate will become even more irrational and misinformed”(Gonchar). There are many non-voters do not participate in the political era of voting. “People who usually wouldn’t vote because they are uneducated or uninterested will flock to the polls to avoid legal issues” (Redlingshafer). The policy of mandatory voting would just make people to vote for what they don’t really care about or interested. Thus, the government should have a better way for the government to encourage people to vote, but not by forcing. Press people to vote is a worse way that the government might take in the…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays