Should People Face A Trial By The Jury System?

For those who want an impartial, and fair verdict when determining an accused person's innocence, than say 'hello' to the jury system. The jury system, typically known as trial by jury, is a system in which a body of people make decisions based upon evidence and fact. The jurors remain impartial, and are not opinionated. However, there is currently a dilemma in the United States about whether people accused of a crime should face a trial by jury. Many people want to relinquish this right. This is significant because all other systems either punish based upon feelings, unfairly punishes the innocent or does not punish the true assailant, and when it does it is not based upon whether they actually committed the crime or not. This is explained in "The Lady, or the Tiger?" By Frank Stockton, and is refuted in "A Defense of the Jury System" by Thomas . Ross, Esq. and "What I Learned Serving on Grand Jury Duty" by Barbara Wagner. People accused of a crime should face a trial by jury because a jury's decision is based upon evidence and facts and is therefore unbiased.
"[My] job was not to debate innocence or guilt. [I] simply decided based upon evidence provided[.]"(text 3, line 7). This quotes suggests that the verdict is unbiased when decided by a jury. It is unbiased, because when you examine the evidence, one's feelings will not get in the way, and if it does it will most likely be cancelled out by the other jurors. When a juror properly examines evidence the criminals are convicted, and the innocent are not punished because all