Preview

Should Tobacco Companies Be Held Responsible

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Tobacco Companies Be Held Responsible
Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths?

I. Introduction
A. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related illnesses? In most cases I believe they should be held liable. Most Americans ask this question and want to know about cigarette companies and why they are allowed to keep selling these products that cause health problems. B. Most people that were smokers way back in the days before they actually had to label their products as unsafe and deadly. In the 70’s it was legal to purchase cigarettes as a teenager and the companies knew that their product was dangerous. Especially since minors were able to purchase these deadly products, they should be held accountable for those that began smoking in their teenage years and were sold to with the reassurance from the company and the government.

II. Are the people responsible for their actions.

A. Should the people make the sound choice to buy cigarettes who know the risk of smoking be held accountable for their health issues. I believe it is called free will in this point being that people today know the repercussions of smoking. B. The fact that all tobacco companies today have to label the warnings on their products and people still make that choice to light up The general public has been well educated about the health risks of smoking, so people who smoke are fully informed about the possible consequences of their habit. Where will that lead our society, more than likely people will try and sue fast food companies for making them fat; trending on down to point the finger at all these companies for the bad choices they made. C. The people that actually started smoking before the surgeon general made these companies put warnings on their products; these people on the other hand did not know the facts about the health issues from smoking. In my eyes these people have every right to be angry or disgruntled with Big

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1)Danny and Marion Klein were injured when an aerial shell at a public fireworks exhibit went astray and exploded near them. They sued Pyrodyne Corp., the pyrotechnic company that was hired to set up and discharged the fireworks, alleging, among other things, that the company should be strictly liable for damages caused by the fireworks display. Will the court agree with the Kleins? a.Yes, because any time a person ignites aerial shells with the intention of sending them aloft to explode in the presence of large crowds knows that injuries can occur. b.Yes, because no matter how much care pyro technicians exercise they cannot eliminate the high risk inherent in setting off powerful explosives such as fireworks near crowds. c.No, because anyone who attends a fireworks display assumes the risk for the potential of injury that may occur. d.No, because all six of the factors needed to prove strict liability was not present. 2)Blue Cross and Blue Shield insurance companies (the Blues) provide 68 million Americans with health-care financing. The Blues have paid billions of dollars for care attributable to illnesses related to tobacco use. In an attempt to recover some of this amount, the Blues filed a suit in federal district court against tobacco companies and others, alleging fraudulent misrepresentation, and negligence among other things. The Blues claimed that beginning in 1953, the defendants conspired to addict millions of Americans, including members of Blue Cross Plans, to cigarettes and other tobacco products. The conspiracy involved misrepresentation about the safety of nicotine and its addictive properties, marketing efforts targeting children, and agreements not to produce or market safer cigarettes. The defendants’ succe...…

    • 664 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Rethinking Our ‘Rights’ to Dangerous Behaviors, Mark Bittman tries to bring attention to unseen or disregarded dangers to the average citizen about the often corrupt ways of Big Business. People often overlook the process of how a product reaches their hands. Most often people only care that they have something to consume, food, drink, medicines or cigarettes, or a product, cars or guns, to show off to friends and neighbors. “But Freudenberg details how six industries — food and beverage, tobacco, alcohol, firearms, pharmaceutical and automotive — use pretty much the same playbook to defend the sales of health-threatening products. This playbook, largely developed by the tobacco industry, disregards human health and poses greater threats to our existence than any communicable disease you can name.”…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. To have the greatest effect on reducing cancer from tobacco use, what other products should the government tax? Why?…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 4 Midtern

    • 2572 Words
    • 11 Pages

    D. Emphasizing that smoking is a decision and that Mark has the cognitive control to quit.…

    • 2572 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP stats project

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Question: Since cigarettes are dangerous and can cause serious side effects, such as cancer, do you think that Cigarettes should be prohibited?…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Homeless

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A. I asked my friend his opinion and he replied, "It 's their own fault. They do it to…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire Essay

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Going back to the 1700's when America was in the process of becoming America, smoking has always been present. Now in present day America, walking down the streets of any town, or road, you see and smell the awful and thick smell of tobacco smoke. 9 out of 10 times you are guaranteed to find an old cigarette on the ground. Attempts to better this issue have been made of course. Gruesome commercials tell the terrible consequences of smoking on the body, taxes have been raised on them, but people continue to smoke. But there still are the good citizens of this country who do not have this awful habit and are free from those horrific consequences of smoking right? Although considering the problem of second-hand smoking many of those "non-smokers" are still affected. I think it is agreed by society as a whole that this problem must be fixed at once. Here I will provide two intelligent solutions to this problem that I have come up with being only a innocent bystander.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Formal

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B. The same logic that leads one to control firearms could also lead one to endeavor to control automobiles and fast food simply because they are instrumental in millions of deaths per year.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Product Liability

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In this age of endless lawsuits and litigation from everyone suing everyone else, one must ask the question "where does product liability end and consumer responsibility begin?" This question has been further complicated by occurrences that stretch to the most far-reaching ends of this spectrum, the spectrum ranging from strict product liability of the company to complete consumer responsibility. On the strict product liability of the company side, we have the cigarette industry where the CEOs of the largest cigarette companies denied that their product was liable for the cause of addiction. Almost all consumers know that the ingredient nicotine in cigarettes is addictive, due to extensive scientific testing and reports on this fact. What these CEO 's should have done was admit that they knew nicotine was addictive, and therefore made their product liable so as to give a fair warning to unknowing consumers. On the complete consumer responsibility side, we can examine the lawsuit where a man sued McDonald 's for over a million dollars because he spilled a cup of their coffee on his self and suffered burns. He claimed that McDonald 's was liable because there was not a warning on the lid that stated that the coffee was hot. In my opinion, this lawsuit should have never happened. The consumer is attempting to alleviate all of the responsibility from himself for spilling his coffee and pass it on to the producer of the product. Frivolous lawsuits such as this, as well as companies failing to consider the importance of product liability, have resulted in an increasing annual product liability bill. Last year alone $4 billion was spent on product liability lawsuits and settlements (McAdams, p.636). This staggering number suggests that maybe we need to reform our liability system. Ideally, we as a society would like to reach a happy medium between strict product liability of the company and complete consumer responsibility. If this occurred, lawsuits such as…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicotine Research Paper

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (b) A smoker should be held accountable to a high degree for his or her addiction to nicotine because they took the initiative or made the decision to begin smoking despite all the advertising of the health risks and consequences that the media and medical providers alert the public with. There are so many risks and exposures that nicotine can bring to a person’s health, physiology and behavior. On the other hand, when a person is already addicted and it’s difficult to stop; when the addiction gets to this point, then their accountability changes. It becomes as a decease that’s uncontrollable. There are different programs and alternatives offered to nicotine addicts, that if sought, they can help with this difficult…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Informative Speech Smoke

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    C. Smoking cigarettes can cause you to get a lot of different kinds of cancer.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tobacco Industry Essay

    • 1159 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a historic judgement, United States (US) District Judge Gladys Kessler, ordered tobacco makers to buy newspaper advertisements detailing adverse health effects in smoking. Justice Kessler in her judgement blamed the tobacco companies of suppressing research, destroying documents, distorting the truth about low-tar and light cigarettes to encourage smokers to switch, instead of quitting, and abused the legal system in order to make profit with disregard to the individual suffering, high health costs and integrity of the US legal system (Schoenberg 2006).…

    • 1159 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teen Tobacco Use

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Furthermore, I collected enough information on this topic to understand the subject of teen smoking, why teens choose to smoke, and what cities and states are doing to prevent it. For example, according to Bill Phelps, a spokesman for Altria in a interview by Steve Leblanc of the Cape Cod Times, teens may not even know why they smoke and that the reasons are often complex. Therefore, he stated “There is no single reason why young people engage in risky behavior such as smoking… there should be a multifaceted approach to embrace youth smoking.” Though, it should be noted that Altria, the company Bill works for, a father company to many big tobacco companies, meaning his words may just be hollow promises to take action on teens smoking; so then, if teens stop smoking a large profit would be lost making him earn less. Indeed, many places happen to take on the issue of teen smoking with a serious and stern approach, with positive results. In fact, Massachusetts has put a state wide smoking ban in many places throughout the state- especially in restaurants- which have barred teens from smoking in public, and if caught they will have to pay a hefty fine. Subsequently, since the passing of this smoking ban from 2005 to 2007 the percent of high school…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Government slowly suffocating these companies who are entitled to advertise and sell their legal ware”. Wait! Dr. Michael Kirsch offers up his support for the big tobacco companies, and in fact feels that consumers knew or should have known the effects of tobacco consumption. With mounting evidence over the years focused on the lies surrounding tobacco companies’ corporate practices, advertising game plans and falsification of nicotine content in their products, one may ask, how can anyone not find fault with tobacco companies. Considering the increasing death rate associated with tobacco consumption, and the falsification of facts regarding the risks associated with tobacco consumption, Dr. Kirsch presumably has a flawed perception of reality regarding the facts surrounding this perceived pandemic. Moreover, how logical is it to hear a medical doctor come to the defense of tobacco companies. In fact, I believe that heavier regulation of the “messages” sent to the public should be imposed, and give the consumers the truth behind what effects are associated with the consumption of “high risk habits”, such as tobacco consumption.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The tobacco industry seems like a beneficial addition to our economy. It has basically been a socially acceptable business in the past because it brings jobs to our people and tax money to the government to redistribute; but consider the cost of tobacco related treatment, mortality and disability- it exceeds the benefit to the producer by two hundred billion dollars US. (4) Tobacco is a very profitable industry determined to grow despite government loss or public health. Its history has demonstrated how money can blind morals like an addiction that is never satisfied. Past lawsuits were mostly unsuccessful because the juries blamed the smoker even though the definition of criminal negligence fits the industry 's acts perfectly. Some may argue for the industry in the name of free enterprise but since they have had such a clear understanding of the dangers of their product it changes the understanding of their business tactics and motives. The success of the industry has merely been a reflection of its immoral practices. These practices have been observed through its use of the media in regards to children, the tests that used underage smokers, the use of revenue to avoid the law, the use of nicotine manipulation and the suppression of research.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays