Preview

Should a Moment of Silence Be Legal in Public Schools?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should a Moment of Silence Be Legal in Public Schools?
In 1962 the Supreme Court decided that public schools did not have the power to authorize school prayer. This decision made public school in the U.S. more atheistic than many European nations. For example, crosses still hang on the classroom walls in Poland, and the Ten Commandments are displayed in Hungary. There are prayers held at the beginning of legislative and judicial sessions and every President has mentioned a divine power in his inaugural speech. In keeping with a spirit of religious freedom as stated in the First Amendment, there is no reason why students should not be allowed to have a moment of silence during the school day when they can pray or do as they choose.<br><br>The case Engel v. Vitale in 1962 decided that school prayer is unconstitutional. With this case, it was pointed out that the students were to "voluntarily" recite the following prayer:<br><br>"Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers, and our country." The court ruled that this rule was unconstitutional according to the First Amendment's "establishment clause," which states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." In response to the Engel v.Vitale case some schools adopted a "moment of silence." <br><br>In 1963, another case was brought before the court dealing with school prayer, Abington School District v. Schempp. The Schempp family challenged a law in Pennsylvania requiring the students to say ten verses of the Bible before school. These readings from the Bible were declared unconstitutional. Members of the board felt reading the Bible would give the children more moral values. The Schempp family strongly disagreed. Members of Congress attempted to find a compromise. From this effort came the adoption of the moment of silence, which is guaranteed by the First Amendment's "Free Exercise" clause.<br><br>Six states now permit silent moments-Georgia, Virginia, Maryland, Mississippi,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Santa Fe Independent SD V. Doe: Case Study
    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Santa Fe Independent SD V. Doe: Case Study

    Facts: In Santa Fe, Texas, students were elected by their classmates to give pre-game prayers at high school football games over the loud speaker that were mainly Christian. A Catholic and a Mormon family felt this was a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution. The school district has always done pre-game invocations before each game however while the case was pending the school district changed their policy, still permitting student led prayer but not requiring them as they were before. The District Court ordered that only nonsectarian and nonproselytizing prayers could be…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Elk Grove V. Newdow Legal Brief
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Elk Grove V. Newdow Legal Brief

    In 1954, Congress amended Title 36 of the United States Code by adding “under God” to the Pledge of Allegiance. California Education Code section 52720 requires appropriate patriotic exercises to be practiced in every public elementary school every day. Elk Grove Unified School District’s policy required the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance every day pursuant to section 52720 of the California Education Code. Michael A. Newdow’s daughter attended a public school in the Elk Grove Unified School District in California. Each day, teachers at the school led the students in a voluntary recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance, which included the words “under God.” Newdow, being an atheist and divorced with “shared physical custody” of his daughter, challenged the constitutionality of Elk Grove Unified School District’s requirement that teachers lead their classes in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Newdow filed suit in federal district court in California claiming that Elk Grove’s recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance violated the 1st Amendment Establishment Clause to the Constitution due to the words “under God” being included and thus, his daughter was being subjected to religious indoctrination. The district court dismissed Newdow’s claim on the ground that he lacked legal standing because he was divorced from Sandra Banning, the mother of his daughter, and that he did not have legal custody of his daughter. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court’s ruling, deciding that Newdow did have holding as a parent to sue and that the school district’s policy violated the establishment clause. The school district appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, which granted review.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Abington School District Vs. Schempp
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case Study: Abington School District Vs. Schempp

    In 1949 a law was made in Pennsylvania that public schools must start each school day with ten bible verses being read, however, there could be no comment on the verses that were read. Students would stand and say the verses along with the teachers. They would then have the students recite the Lord's Prayer. If the teachers refused to read the verses every morning they could be fired. This law angered some people because they believed it was a violation of the First Amendment and so two families sued.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Case Study: Wallace V. Jaffree
    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Case Study: Wallace V. Jaffree

    The 6–3 decision of the majority was delivered by Justice Steven. For his majority opinion, the Alabama law "silence meditation or voluntary prayer" was unconstitutional. He found that was just to promote religion. He also found the implication of the words "voluntary prayer" as an issue of the Alabama law. The Justice Steven just focused on the purpose behind the law. The word "voluntary prayer" is not a protecting the student 's right but it encourage them to voluntary to prayer. One of the Judge also agree with his decision, Judge W.Brevard Hand, ruled prayer decisions in public school were wrong because this law is not apply to the states. As many states, they want to have the same decision and to make the world more successful. They both agree with Wallace v. Jaffree that use instructional times for silent school prayer and in public school are wrong. But with that decision, Justice William Rehnquist disagreed with them. He declared and endorses prayer in public school, even the religious in this situation. In addition, The District Court permitted the prayers to continue, because they ultimately held that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment does not prohibit a state from establishing a religion. ("Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)"). But the Court of Appeals ruled that they were unconstitutional, because the court had considered and had rejected the historical arguments. Because of that, the state appealed to the Supreme Court. When the law appealed to the Supreme Court, the Former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart noted that they did it as the establishment of a religion of secularism. Also, after many decision, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren has angered southern conservatives that as many reason they made even more resentment that lead to many problem. Some people of Christian thought it would be good if the prayers at school. But the Supreme Court still…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Engel Vs. Vitale And Abington V. Schempp
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Engel Vs. Vitale And Abington V. Schempp

    The education of the nation’s youth has always been a contentious issue. One of the largest issues facing the education system is the integration of sectarian religions such as prayers into the classroom and other extensions of the education system. In the mid to late 1900s, several court cases went before the Supreme Court involving various aspects of state sponsored prayers. The two major cases involving prayers in schools were Engel v. Vitale and Abington v. Schempp. Within these two cases, the Court successfully and diligently balanced the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause and paved the way for the Lemon Test and Endorsement Test.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Case Study
    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Engel Vs Vitale Case Study

    In 1962, the New York Law approved a prayer that sent the country into chaos. It all began when the New York Board of Regents authorized a short prayer that students would recite along with the Pledge of Allegiance. According to the school, the prayer was voluntary and non-denominational. The prayer read, "Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and beg Thy blessings upon us, our teachers, and our country." Many parents revolted and argued that the voluntary prayer was against their religious beliefs. One group of parents, lead by Steven Engel, took the case to court, claiming that the prayer violated the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Texas Vs Johnson Case Summary
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Texas Vs Johnson Case Summary

    Engal V Vitale is the supreme court decision involving Steven Engel and William Vitale. It was decided on June 25,1962. This case was about mandatory prayer was aloud in school systems. It was ruled unethical under the first amendment because of freedom of religion. This case is important because it’s a precedent for separation of church and state being that education falls under state. I am interested in this case because I went to a catholic school where prayer was required as a part of the curriculum and I’m interested in the rules in the public school system. (Engal V. Vitale, Wikipedia)…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Wallace Vs. Jaffree
    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Case Of Wallace Vs. Jaffree

    Supreme Court to review the ruling of the court. In 1984 the court made up their mind about the ruling in 1981, now they had to decide if the ruling in 1982 was constitutional. Jaffree argued that the ruling in 1982 was not constitutional, he argued that previous school prayer cases invalidated his case. The court ruled that the ruling in 1982 did not “in any way offend the Constitution”. The court said it “neither proscribes prayer; nor affirms religious belief; nor coerces religious exercise.”…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Case Study
    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Engel Vs Vitale Case Study

    B. In the case of Engel v. Vitale, the Board of Regents for the State of New York approved a short, voluntary prayer to be recited at the start of school each day. A group of parents whose children attended the School District disagreed with this religious practice and argued that the reading of a nondenominational prayer at the start of the school day violates the "establishment of religion" clause…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Engel V Vitale Essay
    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Engel V Vitale Essay

    In 1951, the New York State Board of Regents gave their approval for a prayer that was to be said every morning in school, along with the Pledge of Allegiance ("Engel v. Vitale (1962)"). The Regents believed this prayer would encourage children to be good citizens, along with other benefits such as developing good character. Although this prayer was not required, many students and parents were opposed to the idea and decided to fight against it. In 1962, a group of angry parents reached the Supreme Court and Engel v. Vitale took place. The parents argued that the school prayer violated the First Amendment, and the Supreme Court ruled in their favor. Engel v. Vitale is a very controversial Supreme Court case, but the Court definitely made the right decision. The separation of church and state is a fundamental part of the United States and it needs to be reinforced and preserved, which is exactly what Engel v. Vitale did.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should The 13th Amendment Be Allowed In Schools
    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should The 13th Amendment Be Allowed In Schools

    2. In favor of the Tinker children, it could be argued that of course since they were American citizens attending an American school, they are entitled to their rights to the same extent that a non-minor not in school is. Because it has been ruled the picketing, a form of protest, is a form of symbolic speech, and wearing these black armbands is also a form of protest, that it should be protected under the First Amendment as well. This is compounded by the Fourteenth Amendment, which extends Freedom of Speech to governments, such as school systems.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pledge Of Allegiance Analysis
    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pledge Of Allegiance Analysis

    How would Americans feel if they were prompted to participate in unconstitutional acts every day? Americans dread the thought of having their second amendment stripped away from them. However, what they do not realize is that each morning they are expected to recite a phrase that strips them of their civil rights, as stated in the first amendment: separation of church and state. The Establishment Clause forbids the government from favoring one religion, yet students are supposed to recite the Pledge of Allegiance each morning, which includes the phrase, “under God”. In the Constitution, James Madison wrote that the government shall in no way break the barrier between church and state. This means that religion has no place in politics, or anything government related. Therefore, the phrase “under God” in the pledge should be omitted because it is unconstitutional, challenges the rights of atheists and humanists who do not believe in religion, and subjects students to extreme and unnecessary ridicule.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Students Should Be Allowed To Carry Concealed Weapons In Schools
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Students Should Be Allowed To Carry Concealed Weapons In Schools

    Guns on a school campus is an issue with two clear sides, those who support allowing concealed weapons and those who rally for gun free zones. David Burnett supports the idea of allowing students to carry concealed weapons. Burnett’s central argument is that gun free zones leave students defenseless. Darby Dickerson disagrees, saying students do not understand the responsibilities of owning a weapon and should therefore, not be allowed to carry them on campus.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Should Freedom Of Speech Be Allowed In Public Schools?
    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Should Freedom Of Speech Be Allowed In Public Schools?

    “If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, then we do not believe in it at all.” - Noam Chomsky…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Should Hate Speech Be Allowed In Schools
    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Should Hate Speech Be Allowed In Schools

    In the world in which we live in today, we have many distractions and obstacles that can deter us from the goals and accomplishments that we desire from a young age. At a young age more and more kids are exposed to the harsh realities of the world ranging from the negative words they hear words and even to how they behave and treat their peers in the school systems. With all the technological advances that we have it makes it easier to popularize such words. Hate speech comes from a long history and has been brought into schools which can breed an entire generation to racist actions and ignorance towards specific categories of people. Many groups have been put into place to stop such actions and they try to bring us all together but with all the laws that were made hundreds of years ago it makes it harder and harder to break up and regulate such things as hate speech. WIth the groups that try their best to get rid of hate speech, it brings groups that try to grow hate speech and isolate groups such as the KKk and other supremacist groups. That is why hate speech shouldn’t be allowed and shouldn’t be encouraged.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics