Preview

Similarities Between Hitler And Pol Pot

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
243 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Hitler And Pol Pot
In the beginning, Hitler and Pol Pot decided to target a certain group of people, and then they separated them from the rest, this was an act of classification and symbolization. Pol Pot’s plan was to target the “New People”, which are the people who were doctors, lawyers, religious leaders, and anyone who was associated with imperialism. Unlike the Nazi’s, the Khmer Rouge dispised the ones who seemed as if they were better than the basic, poor or less educated people. According to Adam Jones, the author of the book “Genocide, A comprehensive Introduction”, Pol Pot saw things as urbanism vs peasantism. Hitler, on the other hand, saw things as the Jews being the liability of their downfall. Both Pol Pot and Hitler agreed with getting rid of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Cambodian Genocide was lit up by a man named Saloth Sar, better known as Pol Pot. He was a Cambodian Revolutionary as well as the man who created a communist group known greatly as The Khmer Rouge. Pol Pot and Hitler are similar in this way because Hitler also created a political power party known as the Nazis. Both of these leaders were important dictators who created murderous groups. Additionally, this wasn't the only similarity between the two because Pol Pot and hitler both promised something they couldn't back up. Pol Pot promised a stable communist environment , while Hitler promised a big change in their country. Neither of them were actually doing this for the better, but rather for themselves because they both wanted to have absolute power. The difference between the two of them was that Pol Pot had attempted stability and communism by trying to isolate Cambodia, giving the subtle hint that he would rather be somewhat of an underdog and safe, rather than on top and over powerful. In this case, Hitler was the exact opposite. Hitler wanted to be on top; he wanted to be the top dog. He wanted to make Germany a better country but his view and their view were much different. Hitler didn't want to make it better for the less fortunate, he just wanted to make it better for the, already to be know as, higher class. Furthermore, the way Pol Pot and Hitler ran things were very different but in the long run, they both had the same outcome: world wide tragedy for everyone but themselves.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Keenan uses Albert Speer as a modern example of the sin that God detests: consciously avoiding to love others. In contrast to Hitler, who was at the time seen as an altogether vessel of hate and discrimination, Speer didn't embody those belief systems. Instead, Speer was a simple but famed German architect who was only "interested in his architectural work, his career, and his family" (Keenan 54). Seeing that Speer wasn't driven by the same prejudice that Hitler carried, doesn't that make Speer technically more innocent than Hitler? In a way, yes. However, with that innocence comes the expectation not neglect an opportunity to assist those who need help. This wasn't the case with Speer, who helped to bolster Hitler's influence in Europe…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were two of the most evil men in history, responsible for countless atrocities. They had many similarities as well. Both men committed genocide to further their political agenda, massively improved the militaries of their respective countries, had their own different groups of secret police and spies, and finally they were both tyrannical totalitarian dictators. Despite sharing many similarities, their government structure and political philosophies were very different. Adolf Hitler was a Fascist who believed in a highly centralized government with himself at the top of the pyramid. Joseph Stalin was a communist who believed in collectivism and instilling fear into his political opposition. Although there are…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler commands the Germans to invade the Soviet Union in 1941 – this was Hitler’s greatest mistake, but was luck on the Soviets side or was it all just the leader Stalin’s good tactics and leadership? Even though Stalin was a mass murderer and a ruthless leader, he did one thing right. After the Soviets were losing battle after battle Stalin let his commanders fight the war as they knew it, did not interfere with their plan and stuck to his word, unlike Hitler did. Stalin let his commanders be true commanders and did not use them as puppets or for his own use. He was a true leader stuck to his word which is why I think the he was successful at leading his nation to victory. As the war continued the number of errors that Stalin was making got…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Hitler and Stalin both employed a special police force to help control the country under their totalitarian rule, Hitler’s force relied on having secret police everywhere while Stalin relied on having individuals report their friends and coworkers. To control citizens by spying on them and imprisoning them, Hitler employed the use of the Himmler’s SS and the Gestapo political police. The SS initially started off as Hitler’s personal bodyguards, but under Himmler’s command, they evolved into a more powerful force, who were eventually responsible for the Final Solution. The Gestapo, while somewhat similar to the SS, were Hitler’s secret police, who focused on taking down any opposing political opponents, primarily those who went underground after the creation of the one party system in Germany. The Gestapo were responsible for the capture and imprisonment of most opposing political leaders in Nazi Germany. According to the book on Germany, “Denouncers and…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soon after Pol Pot seized power he started to try to reconstruct Cambodia (Changed to Kampuchea now), trying to make it like communist China with collective farms. Anyone who opposed these plans, which intellectual people were assumed to be, were ordered to be killed. So afraid of death civilians were forced out of towns, even the old or disabled. Those who did not leave were shot. Here is a quote from a victim of this genocide; “They ordered the city evacuated. Everyone was to head for the countryside to join the revolution. They killed those who argued against leaving. Two million frightened people started walking out of the capital.”(Cambodian Genocide) All civil rights and political rights were destroyed. Children were separated from their families and put into different forced labor camps. These forced labor camps caused many to die due to overwork, malnutrition, and disease. They had a diet of one tin of rice, 180 grams, per person every two days. While this was going on purges killed all people who reminded soldiers of the “old life”. Many doctors, lawyers etc. were completely murdered, along with their stores and businesses. Basically, Pol Pot attempted to wipe out anyone who had anything to do with the “Old Life” because they were “threatening” his power. In the Holocaust, first Jewish people were stripped of their rights by the Nuremberg laws. Then they were sent to ghettos, sealing…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you are in a situation that requires legal attention from an experienced and skilled lawyer, Reilly & Reilly PC in Branford, CT, is a trusted firm serving clients in a wide variety of legal areas. With more than three decades of experience, have been in a car accident or are filing for divorce, don’t make the mistake of risking your future by trying to handle legal matters all on your own. An experienced injury attorney or divorce lawyer can provide you with the legal guidance you need to solve even the most difficult situations and achieve a positive outcome. has been serving clients for many decades and are here to provide the legal support and assistance you need. They are prepared to:…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of the nations moved individuals from their homes. In the Cambodian genocide they couldn't have cared less who you were, you were all the while moving to where they needed you to move. The holocaust was the same way the Germans constrained individuals out of the house. In both genocides individual’s rights are taken away and everyone must take after one code of law or set of principles that turns into a standard. The camps, shoddy work and poor working conditions in which the vast majority passed on was a standard in both genocides the holocaust and the Cambodian genocide. The last correlation which was extremely one of a kind is had they just executed a sure sort of individuals. Cambodian individuals in the Cambodian genocide and the Germans in the holocaust.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cambodian Genocide was a terrible atrocity that took place in the late 1900's. Nearly 2 million people died from executions, starvation, overwork and disease, because of the 3 political regimes that took place (Prince Norodom Sihanouk, Lon Nol, Prime Minister Pol Pot) The Last Regime was lead by Pol Pot, his goal was to turn the Southeast Asia into a Agrarian Utopia. On April 17th 1975 Khmer Rouge soldiers marched into Phnom Penh (The Capital of Cambodia) and seized control forcing millions of people to move into the countryside. There they were forced into labor camps to do harsh labor, got little amounts food, and very little rest. They started off by killing former or was presently working as a government official or was in the army…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Jones, in Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction, points to three Khmer Rouge Genocidal Institutions that led to…

    • 4677 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cambodian Genocide was a genocide that was very harsh and ruined many people's lives forever. From April 17, 1975 to January 6, 1979, more than 2 million people died under the Khmer Rouge rule led by Pol Pot in the terrible genocide that we call the Cambodian Genocide. Pol Pot’s main reason to start this genocide was to nationalize the peasant farming society of Cambodia ideally overnight, in accordance with the Chinese Communist agricultural model. This horrific genocide took place in Cambodia and lasted 3 years, 8 months, and 20 days. Some causes of this genocide was the fact that Pol Pot wanted to nationalize the peasant farming society of Cambodia. Most Cambodians involved in the genocide died from starvation,…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if there was never an Adolf Hitler,would the world never have to experience the Holocaust.Probably,the Holocaust would have never existed if there was no Adolf Hitler,he was the one that started the anti-jewish rule.Another key point,is that Jewish people were living in peace until the Germans invaded Poland on September 1939,that is when World War 2 started.The anti-Jewish policy escalated in different steps,it first went to imprisonment and after it went to murdering them.A bit later on,1941 the Germans invaded the Soviet Union,this is when the SS and police started to kill and murder Jewish people. (“Final Solution”:Overview)…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fall of Phnom Penh, a regime known as the Khmer Republic, has fallen. They had a downfall and took power and initiated the policy year zero. During the war there were brutal interrogations, some soldiers from the opposing side had been choked with water. Guatemalan Genocide: Why did Guatemala want to go to war? They wanted political control over people and resources.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All genocides have their separate reasons. The Rwandan Genocide was caused by the belief that one group of people was superior to another group, solely because of their looks. The Armenian Genocide was similar, a group targeted simply because of their ethnicity. In Cambodia, people were killed in the name of politics, while the Bosnian Genocide was caused by belief that one religion was superior to another.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is The Holocaust Unique

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages

    But is it fair to relate it in this term just because the Khmers Rouges left the populace in such a state of trauma that is reflected in the inability of the Cambodians to come to terms with the events linguistically? Cambodia was termed by Uwe Makino as a genocide that ‘represents the final form of social engineering’. Social engineering is the radical and total transformation of a society where it attempts to experiment in an atmosphere of persecution to create a utopian society, and it inevitably leads to crimes against humanity, in extreme cases, to genocide. In agreement with UN definition of the persecution of religious and racial groups, eyewitnesses testified to the Khmer Rouge massacres of monks and the forcible disrobing and persecution of survivors , including Vietnamese, Chinese and the Muslim Chams also massacred until almost 20% of the population were eradicated by 1979. However, the Nazi did not transform German society to the extent of the Red Khmer Cambodia. In terms of the atrocities, Protestant and Catholic churches both survived, on the other hand, the National Library in Cambodia was lotted and books were burned indiscriminately . The economic and intellectual elite was wiped out or driven out of the country. So while Nazi Holocaust were exposed to the terror of concentration camps and death by gas chambers, permanent,…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays