Single-sex education, also known as single-gender education, is the practice of conducting education where male and females students attend separate classes or in separate buildings or schools. It has been a topic of debate especially for parents who have to think about where to send their children to school. There are many reasons and evidence to suggest that single sex schools are more beneficial. They provide students to learn better, allow them to socialize without pressure from the other sex and the increased academic records of students in these types of schools. It has been argued that single-sex schools produce students from different sexes to learn from and about each other. Male and female students can learn from each other’s approaches and learn to collaborate, each bringing their style to bear in working for common goals. This is claimed as in important learning opportunity by advocates of education. However, according to Leonard Sax, founder of the national association for single-sex public education agree that placing boys in separate classrooms from boys accomplishes little. However, as head of the national association for single-sex public schools has pointed out that boys and girls have distinct needs in the classroom, for example, girls do better in warmer classrooms while boys prefer cooler ones. Separating them allows those needs to be met, which will help them to learn more effectively. Moreover, ‘A 2001British study of 2954 high schools and 979 primary showed that male and female students learn and perform better In single sex schools, regardless of socio-economic and ability levels’. Single sex schools do not give children enough of a social environment to keep them interested in applying themselves day after day. They lose interest as they become teenagers; they become less interested in school and education because simply
Single-sex education, also known as single-gender education, is the practice of conducting education where male and females students attend separate classes or in separate buildings or schools. It has been a topic of debate especially for parents who have to think about where to send their children to school. There are many reasons and evidence to suggest that single sex schools are more beneficial. They provide students to learn better, allow them to socialize without pressure from the other sex and the increased academic records of students in these types of schools. It has been argued that single-sex schools produce students from different sexes to learn from and about each other. Male and female students can learn from each other’s approaches and learn to collaborate, each bringing their style to bear in working for common goals. This is claimed as in important learning opportunity by advocates of education. However, according to Leonard Sax, founder of the national association for single-sex public education agree that placing boys in separate classrooms from boys accomplishes little. However, as head of the national association for single-sex public schools has pointed out that boys and girls have distinct needs in the classroom, for example, girls do better in warmer classrooms while boys prefer cooler ones. Separating them allows those needs to be met, which will help them to learn more effectively. Moreover, ‘A 2001British study of 2954 high schools and 979 primary showed that male and female students learn and perform better In single sex schools, regardless of socio-economic and ability levels’. Single sex schools do not give children enough of a social environment to keep them interested in applying themselves day after day. They lose interest as they become teenagers; they become less interested in school and education because simply