Preview

Sir Douglas Haig: The Battle Of The Somme

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
259 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sir Douglas Haig: The Battle Of The Somme
The Battle of the Somme was one of the largest battles of the first world war, which was fought between July 1st and November 1st in 1918. It was named so as the battle was fought near the Somme river in France. On the first day alone, our side suffered more than 57 thousand casualties and by the last day of the battle we had lost more than 1.5 million men. Sir Douglas Haig was British commander on the Western Front during the majority of the first world war. The high casualties of the battle were caused mostly due to his military strategies. This made him a controversial figure in the eyes of many.

Haig has been considered to be the Butcher of the Somme, as he used tactics which sent thousands of men into a battle that would result in their
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Unit 1 Research Paper
    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ww1 Unit 1 Research Paper

    Even though each soldier would have been involved in some form of continual conflict with serving on the front-line (trench rapids, snipers, shelling), it is possible to distinguish major battles (or pushes) whose names have gone down in history as some of the bloodiest conflicts ever waged. There were many battles that took place during the war but the most remembered were the five major battles. Those battles are, The Battle of Marne (1914 and 1918), The Battle of Verdun (1916), The Battle of Ypres (1914, 1915, and 1917), The Battle of the Somme (1916), and The Battle of Cambrai (1917). This paper will explain the pros and cons and major details of each battle.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Interpretation that Haig was/wasn't a Butcher (Source analysis)
    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Interpretation that Haig was/wasn't a Butcher (Source analysis)

    Source B4 was written by David Lloyd George, who was at the time Prime Minister of Britain during WW1. He describes Haig as a “second rate commander” because of the high death count at the Somme, he later describes Haig as being incapable of “planning vast campaigns on the scale demanded on so immense a battlefield”. The source is reliable because of the fact that it was written by the…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Battle Of The Somme Go So B
    • 1160 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Did The Battle Of The Somme Go So B

    One of the main tactics used on the Somme before the initial battle was the Preliminary Bombardment. The Bombardment consisted of a heavy rain of artillery shells over the German trenches, for seven days and nights before the battle began. However there was a problem with this plan, many of the shells did not detonate and two thirds of over 1.7 million shells were shrapnel shells. Another tactic used was the digging and detonation of mines. 8 ‘mega mines’ had been set along an 18 mile front along with 11 other mines that would hopefully blow the german trenches apart minutes before the battle began. The Somme mines were the largest mines ever detonated yet in the war. John Simkin wrote in the Spartacus First World War Encyclopedia, that although the preliminary bombardment had the means to be successful, it was unable to break through the sophisticated German trenches. He also said that the Preliminary bombardment had the disadvantage of informing the…

    • 1160 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Some People Have the View That British Generals Like Haig Were Incompetent Leaders. How Far Does the Sources Support or Contradict This Interpretation?
    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Some People Have the View That British Generals Like Haig Were Incompetent Leaders. How Far Does the Sources Support or Contradict This Interpretation?

    A direct witness Fred Pearson, who was a private on the Western Front , holds a letter to a local newspaper during 1966 (Source B3). He says in the letter “The biggest murderer of the lot was Haig” this quote supports the view of British generals being incompetent. Debates still rage about Haigs tactics at the Battle of the Somme, when 20,000 men were killed on the first day alone. He also talks about his wrong decisions where he…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is It Fair to Criticise General Haig as a Donkey Who Led Lions
    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is It Fair to Criticise General Haig as a Donkey Who Led Lions

    There is sufficient evidence to indicate that that Douglas Haig was a poor General, or a donkey. The evidence is that General Haig, along with many other Generals, were used to handling small-scale forces in colonial warfare. They had a lot to learn about this type of warfare, for which they were very unprepared. Furthermore, communications were poor, and armies were too big and dispersed to be commanded by a General himself. Haig should have, however, made sure that all his soldiers knew what the plan was before they set off, and Haig should have planned how he was going to communicate with them. Moreover, if the infantry and artillery did manage to hit the enemy Haig lacked a fast moving force to use the situation effectively. Additionally, General Haig’s 1914 tactics had yet to catch up with the range and effectiveness of modern artillery and the latest machine guns. Likewise, Haig learnt the wrong lesson from previous attacks, instead of persisting with short times of extreme amounts of fire. Haig used heavier guns and longer bombardments that just churned up the ground and eliminated the element of surprise. Haig was not able to accept information passed on to him, a great example of this was when it was suggested that much of the barbed wire on the Somme was not cut, he admitted that himself, but he still…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Keegan: Face of Battle Review
    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Keegan: Face of Battle Review

    As we have discussed and examined over the past two weeks of our seminar, John Keegan’s The Face of Battle explores warfare from the viewpoint of the common soldier by analyzing and comparing the three well-known battles of Agincourt, Waterloo and Somme. Keegan's three examinations of Agincourt, Waterloo and the Somme begin by analyzing the traditional outlines of events. Keegan then moves through the main phase of each battle, attempting to make sense of the major events, providing the frame and context necessary in order to begin considering the combatants: how the soldiers felt before the battle, what actually happened when the troops engaged, focusing-in on what these nuanced psycho-sociological details provide. Towards this monumental effort, while limiting much of his coverage largely to the first day of the offensive, Keegan was particularly focused revealing the brutality of the first day of Somme: “In all, the British had lost about 60,000, of whom 21,000 had been killed, most in the first hour of the attack, perhaps the first minutes" (Keegan, 1983). The conditions of the battle were so abhorrent, Keegan describes, with “long docile lines of young men, shoddily uniformed, heavily burdened, numbered about their necks, plodding forward across a featureless landscape to their own extermination" (1983).…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Was The First Day Of The Battle Of Somme Dbq
    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Was The First Day Of The Battle Of Somme Dbq

    Though they won in the long run, the first day of the Battle of Somme was a major defeat for the British. Over 57,000 British soldiers died on the first day. According to George Coppard, hundreds of his fellow soldiers lay dead the morning after the attack. Many were caught in the barbed wire of the Germans trenches, leaving few survivors (Document B). The skillful thinking of the Germans saved them from facing a loss as grand as Britains.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Battle of the Somme and Source
    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Battle of the Somme and Source

    Source 1 is an extract from Sir Douglas Haig’s final dispatch, published in March 1919. This source begins to describe the Battle of the Somme as a tremendous victory. Haig claims that “The three main objectives… had been achieved.” Haig also then begins to describe the three objectives, “Verdun had been relieved…”, “German forces had been held down…” and “the enemy’s strength had been considerably worn down”. Haig also claims that as the objectives had been “achieved” this was enough to “…justify the Somme Battle.” This source was published shortly after the war in 1919, but was a few years after the Battle of the Somme allowing some time for the truth about the events of the battle to emerge. The source has some limitations as it was an extract from Haig’s own writing, who was Commander-in-Chief of the British Forces therefore the source may be bias towards Britain and their success in the battle. The purpose of the source was to inform people of Haig’s perception of the battle and due to this being one person’s view, the accuracy of the source cannot be verified.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Does Field Marshal Haig Desreve the Title of "The Butcher of the Somme"?
    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Does Field Marshal Haig Desreve the Title of "The Butcher of the Somme"?

    Field Marshal Douglas Haig was a British senior officer in World War One and commanded in the Battle of the Somme, which was arguably one of the bloodiest battles in British military history. Haig gained the title of the butcher of the Somme after the end of World War One, due to the indescribable amount of casualties and deaths that took place. One could say that Haig deserves the title because of the huge loss of life, his bad planning and repetition of bad tactics and the fact that he was completely out of touch with his soldiers. Some say he doesn’t because he was arguably the best the British had, no one knew how to fight in trench warfare and he pushed what was arguably the world's most powerful army off of French soil.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Haig was the Butcher of the Somee
    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Haig was the Butcher of the Somee

    Another reason I think that perhaps Haig does not deserve the title ‘Butcher of the Somme’ because he had untrained men and they weren’t used to fighting which made them very vulnerable to the experienced German soldiers. We often think about Haig relaxed with his feet up while his men were fighting and dying. However Haig was under enormous pressure.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Haig Butcher of the Somme
    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Haig Butcher of the Somme

    General Sir Douglas Haig, British Commander-in-Chief on the western front, was not really ready to attack in mid-1916. He wanted to wait until later in the year and attack in Flanders (not the Somme). However, his hand was forced. In February 1916, the Germans attacked the French fortress of Verdun. The attack intensified for the next four months until there was a danger that Verdun would fall and the Germans would break through the French lines. The British and French governments decided that Haig would have to attack at the Somme in July. This would be the first major battle of the war for the British Army.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme
    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Did Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme

    By the battle of the Somme in 1916 the war had been in a huge stalemate for 18 months that didn’t look like it was going to be broken any time soon. Trenches had been dug on the Western front all they way from the coast at Ostend to the Alps. Just before the offensive at the Somme, Verdun was under a heavy attack from German forces forcing the French to pull all their troops back to Verdun. General Haig was asked to relieve pressure of the French by French commanders. Therefore there was no choice but an offensive somewhere on the Western Front by the British army. I believe General Haig did deserve to be named Butcher of the Somme for several reasons. Firstly because of the number of casualties, secondly because of his naivety not to change his tactics and lastly due to the poor planning by Haig,…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was General Haig the Butcher of the Somme?
    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Was General Haig the Butcher of the Somme?

    General Haig's title of 'butcher of the Somme' originated after the First World War, when, due to a large number of casualties Britain suffered from the war and mostly the Somme. The people of Britain wanted someone to blame. This was a coping mechanism in which people could deal with the loss of the 'lost generation'. Feild Marshall Haig has often been called the butcher of the Somme because 20000 soldiers died on the first day of the battle, and a further 40000 were injured. The battle of the Somme was one of the 6 blodiest battles of world war one, and resulted in more British dead than any battle before it. One canadian Battalion lost 700 out of 850 men in the battle of the Somme. Stories started to reach home of the heavy casulty losses and the awful conditions n the trenches.However, some historians disagree and argue that Haig was not responsible for the human losses, because his military methods were in line with the ideas of the time (source 2, a book called Feild Marshall Haig written by Philip Warner an Historian). Death is a fact of war. Haig wrote 'The nation must be thought to bear losses. No amount of skill on the part of the commanders, no training however good, no superiority of arms and ammunition will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men's lives. The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lions Led by Donkeys Essay Example
    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lions Led by Donkeys Essay Example

    Douglas Haig was Britain’s commander-in-chief during the battle of the Somme and took much criticism for the utter loss of life in this battle. Haig put his belief in one final mighty push against the Germans to be executed in the Somme region of France. Haig did not rate very highly the war's new weaponry. "The machine gun is a much over rated weapon," he said in 1915; he made similar remarks over the use of the tank. The tank was a British invention which had made its debut on the Somme…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Haig Is Bad Leader
    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Haig Is Bad Leader

    The battle of the Somme occurred on the 1th of July 1916, with the English and French army fighting against the German. English’s army’s leader, Haig, was considered to be a donkey, meaning to be a bad general. The historian John Laffin claims that Haig was an awful leader; he says that “Haig really thought he was doing what the people wanted him to do” which makes us think that he was being a good general. These facts may not be true as it was take nearly a 100 years after the war so the facts can be muddled up and he wasn’t there to witness it, he’s just saying from his point of view, but because Haig was deluded that he was doing the right thing and that it would work made him think he would win the war, but it didn’t happen. For this reason, Haig was a donkey.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics