Preview

Sir Winston Churchill: Democracy Is The Worst Form Of Democracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sir Winston Churchill: Democracy Is The Worst Form Of Democracy
When Sir Winston Churchill was making a speech to the House of Lords November 11th 1941 this phrase was made ( Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.) This is only part of the speech this was a debate in the House of Lords to pass the Parliament Act of 1911. He questioned the House of Lords questioning him as a democratically participant of the state of the speech that he gave. He dared the House of Lords and Senators who questioned his nobility and his right of questioning how the Democratic process …show more content…
his stand against his own party for the justice of those which elected him to be in Parliament . he his speech sew in Winston Churchill speech was to Rally those Democrats and other parties within the party they did not see the Democratic party operating in the behalf of its elected people . to Rally them to his claws to quaff the limitations of the parliament extend their reach Apollo meant to create a more democratic process that would not be mucked up by individuals with their own self-interest . Sir Winston Churchill High opposition and his own Democratic party but she said it was made famous for individuals to try and further their own hidden agendas not to serve the will of the people. He basically gave way to the notion that Being in the political Arena had nothing to do with popularity and had everything to do with the will of the individuals that put them there. So those big business's and Companies and self interest groups that wanted to have their say with in Parliament We're not of the first agenda that should have been looked at it should be the will of the people in the firmament of the people's self

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    He claimed that the most able men were rarely placed in the positions they deserved—those at the head of affairs. He also said ordinary citizens ignored important issues of public policy, refused to elect their intellectual superiors to office, and willingly assented to the politicians and leaders that lied to gain people’s support.…

    • 2713 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    and to show respect where respect is deserved. These points in his speeches show that he had a great mind, and was a very respectable guy. He wanted to the union to work and at the same time teach the people a lesson while he was succeeding.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lloyd George's post as primeminister was in a way doomed from the beginning. He came to power at the head of a coalition party making enemies along the way. Most notably Asquith and many other Liberal MPs people whom should have been supporters. Instead he became a prisoner of the Conservative Party the main bulk of the coalition. Lloyd George's policies of reform and views on the Irish question were incompatible with many conservatives. Whom when it came to 1922 would abandon him. This incompatibility stifled the coalition's progress. The high hopes of a "land fit for heroes" meant this lack of progress especially hurt his reputation in office.…

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jefferson vs Hamilton

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He was a political genius, and worked as leader of his party to give the Republicans in Congress direction.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    “What is our task? To make Britain a fit country for heroes to live in”. David Lloyd George , Wolverhampton 1918…

    • 4686 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    He argued that man was born naturally stable and desired good and needed to watch the government around them to guarantee that the government does not fail to protect those basic rights. He also argues that there shouldn’t be laws that affect only some people, like the rich versus the poor, but rather affect everyone.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Churchill's speech, back in October 29, 1941 for the Harrow School for Boys, the use of rhetorical devices such as ethos, logos, and pathos made the speech very well executed. Due to this, he truly connected, made an impact on, and influenced the public audience.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamilton wanted a stronger government and he did a lot to accomplish that. He influenced a lot of political thought and his contributions were more significant that people tend to…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He focused on more political advancement than an extension of suffrage. He referred to Gladstone as “God's Only Mistake” when others referred to him as “Grand Old Man.” The goal was to regain government and to use reform as a leverage of civility. He gave votes to working men and increased the number of voters. The bill was passed under Disraeli and his craftiness, receiving a feeling of accomplishment and credit for the work of Gladstone.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When giving a speech a speaker must be able to connect with his audience, the speaker wants his/her speech to be easy to follow and easy to understand. It is for those specific reasons that speakers purposely put in lots of logos, pathos, and ethos into their speeches so that the audiences can connect emotionally, ethically, and intellectually with what they are talking about. A particular speech that uses many examples of pathos, logos, and ethos is The Great Arsenal of Democracy given by President Roosevelt on December 29, 1940. Throughout the speech President Roosevelt uses excessive amounts of pathos to connect with his people emotionally. He plays on their pride, fear, and the feelings of shame. He uses logos to express the facts and reasoning behind why the American people should help the British. The president knows that his people won’t go on blind faith; they need facts and reasoning to help the British. It is also because of the knowledge that the American won’t go blindly into war just to help, that he also puts lots of ethos into it to appeal to their ethical side. FDR wants the American people to see him as a strong leader who has a plan, as well as; the best interest for his people in mind. He is truthful and honest with them and lays down the line that if they don’t help the UK that America will be in even greater danger if the UK was to fall to the Nazis. It is for the safety of America that the president wants his people to feel emotionally, ethically, and intellectually unified with Great Britain so that by saving them they can save themselves from an even bigger threat down the road.…

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Jenkins

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He embodied the counsel to “count others more significant” than ourselves, looking “not only to our own interests, but to the interests of others.”…

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Resulted in different demands being placed on political parties as they had to win over working classes…

    • 265 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Balfour was a leader of the commons until his uncle Lord Salisbury retired 1902, after this he succeeded his position as prime minister and leader of the conservative party. This upset a majority of people as Balfour was not voted in to the position but took over from his uncle. Balfour wasn’t good at speaking out loud and struggled with leadership as he was very indecisive unlike his uncle which made it fairly obvious that he wasn’t a good leader for the conservatives and meant that some people no longer supported the conservative party because of him.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hackneyed, yet apt and succinct, definition of Democracy by Abraham Lincoln as contained in the concluding part of his famous Gettysburg Address as ‘’…government of the people, by the people, for the people…’’ remains today as the most quoted statement on Democracy. However, a careful examination of our democratic experiment leaves one to wonder if this definition perfectly encapsulates our experience. Our government is, granted, elected by the ordinary people, which bears testimony to the fact that we practise a form of democracy which is ‘’of the people’’. However, I contend that our form of government is not a government whose workings have, wholly, over the years, proven to be in the interest of the people. We are constantly saddled with the unfortunate and despicably capricious abrupt abrogation of government’s contracts shortly after a change from one democratically-elected head of state to another of different political persuasions. Our constitution, under The Directive Principles of State Policy, explicitly, states in Article 35, Clause (7) that, ‘’As far as practicable, a government shall continue and execute projects and programmes commenced by the previous Governments.’’ When a successive Government arbitrarily abrogates a contract, most of the time for political expediency, those who bear the brunt of this ill-advised action have always been the ordinary tax payer. Classic cases in point are the payments of judgment debts by the current and previous Governments, which were shrouded in some amount of secrecy until recent revelations. Governments engage in this reprehensible act in a sophomoric attempt to make their predecessors unpopular. Such a practice does not engender development, which democracy seeks to attain for all. Democracy must result in meaningful development for the populace, otherwise it is of no significance; we do not practise democracy just for the sake of it. It is to afford…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays