Preview

Slavery: The Southern States During The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
631 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Slavery: The Southern States During The Civil War
In the mid-1800s, there was conflict surrounding the idea of slavery. This conflict led to a division of the nation and had a huge impact on the 1860 election of Abraham Lincoln. Slavery was considered necessary in the Southern States, but as a united nation both the North and the South couldn’t have their way. The Northern States wanted to prohibit slavery, however the Southern States wanted to allow slavery. This led to many disputes, violent uproars, and protest throughout the nation.
In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska act was passed allowing two states located in the middle of the states to decide whether they wanted to allow slavery within their borders. Nebraska became a free state due to its position being so far North, however the choice for Kansas was not as easy. Slavery was allowed in Kansas, but on a much smaller scale than in Southern States. The Civil War was a war fought between the people of the Union (Northern States) and those of the Southern States (Confederates) from 1861-1865 where the confederacy fought to establish itself a separate nation. As Lincoln states in Document A, “I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free.” In this document Lincoln discusses how the nation needs to be as one and either all be slave states or all be free states because the division would cause
…show more content…
The document discusses points such as that “a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization”. Southern States argued that slavery was a necessary means and a way of living. These slaves were their mean to make necessary products. The State of Mississippi felt that “there was no choice left but submission to the mandates of abolition.” Abolition in this case meant to get rid of slavery. The Southern States knew if they didn't secede from the Union, slavery would be prohibited nation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When Abraham Lincoln was elected president and vowed to abolish slavery, he promised that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists” (Source C). However, South Carolina did not believe in his ideas of slavery and chose to secede on December 20, 1860 along with six other states, which are Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas. They seceded because the secessionists thought that the new Republican administration would subvert the right of southern slaveholders to carry their human property into the territories (pg. 407), but they did not believe that Lincoln would not interfere with slavery where it already existed. Due to the strong belief that…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years of 1830-1860, there were many conflicts on the views of slavery within our country. The North was working to bring an end to slavery with the creation of the routes to free slaves. The South was enthusiastic about the continuation of slavery with the help of the courts. The conflicts were put on hold with many compromises, but were dismantled by future legislation leading to bloodshed in America.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The non-extension of slavery into the western territories disrupted the nation in the 1800s. President Lincoln’s indifferent attitude towards slavery interfered with the nation southern states and states where slavery existed. Lincoln cared about the union as it was unraveling. Most people at that in the North supported a war to restore the Union but not as a military crusade to end slavery. The American Civil War was an economic conflict not a race issue between the Union and the Confederacy.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Slavery was a major cause of sectional crisis in nineteenth century America. Northern representatives detested the slave trade and wanted it to end immediately, while Southerners avoided using the word "slavery" and argued for it. When Northern delegates pushed too hard for reform, Southern delegates, especially those in South Carolina, threatened to leave the convention. This would destroy any hope of establishing a strong central government.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    South Vs North The South did wanted slaves ,while the North did not want nothing to do with slavery. In the united states there use to be equal amount of slave states. The South and the North had different opinions on slavery. The south wanted slavery while the North opposed to have slavery in the territory. The north wanted to move because they did not want slavery.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people did not like the idea of slavery being banned in large areas. The southerners feared that if territories didn’t have slavery, then they would become states and might take some of their…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery; North The North during the civil war era saw no need for slavery as factory production boomed. Most of the workers in the factories were woman and children who worked for a low wage, so slavery was not a hot commodity. The political cartoon to the left is considered a northern view based upon how the north fought for the freedom and equality of slaves. The cartoon depicts the blacks and the whites uniting through a waltz. The definition of Amalgamation is to unite or combine two.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Black slavery in the South created a bond among white Southerners and cast them in a common mold. Slavery was also the source of the South 's large agricultural wealth, which led to white people controlling a large black minority. Slavery also caused white Southerners to realize what might happen to them should they not protect their own personal liberties, which ironically included the liberty to enslave African Americans. Because slavery was so embedded in Southern life and customs, white leadership reacted to attacks on slavery after 1830 with an ever more defiant defense of the institution, which reinforced a growing sense among white Southerners that their values eventually divided them from their fellow citizens in the Union. The South of 1860 was uniformly committed to a single cash crop, cotton. During its reign, however, regional differences emerged between the Lower South, where the linkage between cotton and slavery as strong, and the Upper South, where slavery was relatively less important and the economy more diversified. Plantations were the leading economic institution in the Lower South. Planters were the most prestigious social group, and, though less than five percent of white families were in the planter class; they controlled more than forty percent of the slaves, cotton, and total agricultural wealth. Most had inherited or married into their wealth, but they could stay at the top of the South 's class structure only by continuing to profit from slave labor. Planters had the best land. The ownership of twenty or more slaves enabled planters to use a gang system to do both routine and specialized agricultural work, and also permitted a regimented pace of work that would have been impossible to impose in free agricultural workers. Teams of field hands were supervised by white overseers and black drivers, slaves selected for their management skills and agricultural knowledge.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secession Dbq

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800s, slavery was a very important talked about subject matter in politics, economics, and culture. It was such an important aspect of the time period that it was on everyone’s mind, and everyone had an opinion on it. This tore the country in half, and forced the South into secession. Many people wonder if this was legal, but due to the fact that the North had also broken laws and that the lawbook was in their favor, the South was entitled to secession.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was a commonly debated issue during the early 1800’s. The issue of slavery caused individuals to question if slavery was against the Constitution. Slavery slowly was dying out in America, most prominently in the North, but when Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, the hope of slavery dying out in the South ended. Slaves were now a very important part of Southern economy, because unlike the industrialized North, the main source of income for the South was cotton farmed by thousands of slaves on plantations.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery is the central conflict in which northern and southern states disagree whether or not to abolish it. Frederick Douglass wrote, “The fact that this is a slaveholder's rebellion and nothing else - all point out that slavery as the thing to be struck down, as the best means of the successful and permanent establishment of peace and prosperity of the nation.” There were many factors that resulted in the uprising of the Civil War, but disagreement over slavery was the main one. Without slavery, our nation would finally establish unity and peace.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery was an issue in slave states from South and Free states North in 1800s. South states were the agricultural area so they needed slaves and support it, but not the North state. Several disputes exists, Congress performed compromises to settle these disputes. But these compromises could not hold for longer. (1820 - 1861: HOLDING THE UNION TOGETHER) Missouri Compromise in 1820, Nat Turner's Rebellion in 1831,…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1860s election,the topic of slavery brought many political tensions to the Republicans and Democrats.The Republicans was an anti-slavery party.The Republicans disagree of the spreading of slavery and would take this issue to Congress,whenever they can,to stop its expansion.They viewed slavery as an a problem that would last forever,and thought the problem would soon lead to extinction (http://www.tulane.edu/~latner/Background/BackgroundElection.html). As for the Democrats,they were pro-slavery party.They viewed slavery was good not only for the slave holder,but also for the slave(John C. Calhoun).In the 1850s Abraham Lincoln said that slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” but later on in his first Inaugural Address he said that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.”Abraham Lincoln personally didn't like slavery but as a Republican he wished to abolish it.But as the President of America,he made a promise to the Constitution,which protected slavery (http://www.history.com/topics/emancipation-proclamation). Therefore the tension that rose from slavery resulted in constant fighting of the Republicans and Democrats.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery In Secession

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This was an argument that was used mainly by Georgia when they decided to leave union. “A united north was now strong enough to control the government in all of its departments.” This statement was their basis for leaving the union. It was a belief that the south could no longer defend slavery while within in the union from the more populous north. Mississippi had a similar stance “We must either submit to degradation, and to the loss of property (slaves) worth billions of money, or we must secedes” Mississippi also saw the ultimate destruction of slavery in their near future if they remained in the union. Mississippi and all of the other Deep South states believed that if the Border States remained in the Union, the federal government would eventually take away their slaves. It was due in part to this belief that the Deep South argued to the Border States that secession from the Union was their only viable option to retain…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1800’s there was much turmoil over the debate of slavery and whether it was inhumane or not. Slavery caused the nation to separate into 2 factions; the north, who believe in abolishing slavery and the south who thought that slavery was a “benign institution” as quoted by Ulrich B. Phillips. There is much debate whether slavery was the prominent cause of the Civil War. Contrary to popular belief, slavery was not the ultimate cause of the Civil War; in fact the economic, cultural, and political differences between the North and South played more prominent roles in the instigation of the Civil War and influenced the beginnings of slavery.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays