Social Conflict Approach Essay

I believe that the social-conflict approach is the best theory that explains social movements. A social movement can be defined as an organized activity that encourages or discourages social change. There are four different types of social movements. They are alternative, redemptive, reformative, and revolutionary. When looking at the social-conflict approach, it can be described as a framework for building theory that sees society as an arena of inequality that generates conflict and change. Looking at the definition alone, you can see how it could explain the reasons for social movements. The last few words of the definition are “generates conflict and change”. You can see how a social movement could come out of this approach. The social-conflict
Again, all these relations I just mention have led to or are leading to social movements. The text also states that many sociologists use the social-conflict theory as a part of their efforts to reduce inequality. Inequality is another huge reason for social movements around the world. When looking at social movements as a whole, they are trying to promote some sort of social change. This social change that these people want to see can be for a number of different reasons, many of which the social-conflict approach describes. The social-conflict approach describes how it pushed for conflict and change which is exactly what a social movement is. When trying to find which is the best explanation for why social movements occur, the social-conflict approach is the best primary theory to use because it is the only theory that is explain that conflict and change is necessary in order to have stability. These all relate back to what a social movement is, as it is an organized acidity that encourages or discourages social