Social Consequences Of Intersectionality

Economic deficiency is not an exclusionary term fixated on the idea of financial stability and state of poverty; instead, it is a factor of intersectionality. Economic deficiency is measured along with other variables relating to inequality such as social class, gender, and race. These variables can be an added perspective to measure economic deficiency since they all tend to overlap and affect the person; furthermore, it may be more significant to examine the consequences of economic deficiency and its relation to crime when all variables are considered as well. The notion of economic deficiency as part of intersectionality is significant because it may reform the way crime is viewed, and how policies are created in response to those ideas of crime and
Instead of the deterministic view that criminals behave the way they do because of their static features of criminality-prone characteristics or decisions, this concept of intersectionality with the inclusion of economic deficiency may provide a way of understanding of how structural inequalities and differences may influence the decision to deviate or to offend. Structural differences in class and socioeconomic status, along with racial and gender differences, all create unique experiences pertaining to an individual or to a community of shared experiences. When there is class inequality, followed by the widening gap of the poor and the rich, there is less similarities in how the two groups may view what goals or values are important and how they can be achieved. There are different exposures to what one’s reality appears like, and what types of behaviors may be influenced from those circumstances. Less emphasis may be placed at the hands of the individuals if intersectionality and its impact on criminality and deviancy is legitimatized and