Preview

Social Darwinism Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
427 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Darwinism Speech
Taylor Hamilton
May 19, 2014
Period 7
Social Darwinism speech

Let me start by giving you my name: I am T. Phillips Thompson, and I am a Canadian poet and a social reformer. I wrote “The Political Economist and the Tramp”. I have strong beliefs that Social Darwinism is wrong. My poem ridicules Social Darwinism, and the very idea that we could leave fellow Americans behind. Leaving poor Americans without any government aid is wrong and immoral. Government assistance should be a moral obligation. “Survival of the fittest” should be left to the animals in the wild, not to the civilized humans, when have the ability and tools to help the ones who need assistance.
Many of our greatest inventors and innovators were born poor. If those individuals would have never been helped, where would we be without their inventions and grants for society?
Many of my colleagues say that failure is directly tied to genetics, so we should involuntarily sterilize those who are failing, a tactic also known as eugenics. But, it has been proven that failure is tied to the environment we were raised in, not our DNA. Who is to say a rich man cannot come out of a poor family? If the poor and unstable are left to fend for themselves, some are likely to commit crimes so they are arrested. They will be given food and shelter for free by the government. Could you imagine, having to be arrested and placed with criminals, just because you can’t afford food or a home to live in? Nobody should have to resort to such methods of survival. If you ask me, that is animalistic (and primitive?).
It takes all kinds to make the world go round, and the people who don’t make as much money as the big businessmen are part of that world, just as much as the people like Andrew Carnegie are.

It is not only the government’s obligation and duty to help the impoverished, but it is also our duty not to let fellow Americans be left to their own devices when our government decides they don’t
need

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Carnegie has inspired women and men to use their funds to their communities. Although he advised other wealthy to use their money to benefit the communities and help in the preservation of the political system and America economy. I believe Mr. Carnegie’s argument is persuasive and is still relevant today. The wealthy, as well as small business owners, are the job creators in our society today. Their vision and leadership help to support the lower class in earning a decent living while allowing them to realize their own potential. The lower class today has more opportunities that were not available to them generations ago. While government is there to provide a safety net for those less fortunate, it is the wealthy and job creators that…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Beginning in the Elizabethan Era, unworthy poor was a label placed on able bodied people that appeared to choose to not work. They were often treated harshly and in extreme cases, put to death (Shelly, 2011). In today’s society such treatment would be unheard of. The act of even labeling this group of people or other groups is discouraged and even against the NASW’s The Code of Ethics (2008). When faced with the multi billion dollar price tag of welfare, we need to make a distinction of who is worthy or unworthy to receive government assistance. The question arises on how this can be done without impeding the rights of the poor.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gilded Age - Paper 2

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Successful businessmen and captains of industry such as Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, and William Vanderbilt enjoyed astonishing profits. But while the rich and wealthy like Carnegie, Morgan, and Vanderbilt enjoyed this unprecedented rise in profits and spent lavishly on things such as diamonds, homes, and clothes, many of the poor wore rags and lived in crowded tenements. Many of the poor were immigrants with limited education, limited work skills, and limited knowledge of the English language. They often labored in hazardous factories on a rigid, regimented, and exhaustive work schedule.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion Failure is not an illness- it is not a permanent condition. (Duckworth, 2016).…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the topic of welfare is brought into an ethical discussion most individuals would surely see it as an ethical act that genuinely helps those in need. This is true to an extent, but is it possible that welfare does more harm than good? Most would argue that the hand out of money to those less fortunate is being socially responsible. The question that drives this ethical issue is where does social responsibility end and personal responsibility pick up? This question is difficult to answer because every family in need is in a different situation. Government benefits are supposed to be used as a crutch for families to get back on their feet, but about twenty percent of all families receiving welfare stay on the program for more than five years. {text:bibliography-mark} This is the base of ethical issues surrounding government assistance and social responsibility for the needy. Many individuals believe that receiving a government hand-out allows people to become satisfied with being on welfare. If programs like food stamps and welfare aren’t effective, they are essentially a black hole for the tax dollars of working Americans. There is no denying the fact that there are needy families out there who are so impoverished that they need aid, but it is nearly impossible to separate the abusers from the desperate. It is for this reason many arguments can be made for both sides of government assistance. The most common question is, how far should a government’s social responsibility stretch? The issuing of government benefits derived from tax dollars is a strong ethical dilemma that has both social and economical repercussions. {text:bibliography-mark}…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism fueled imperialism by making imperialistic nations believe that their imperialistic ventures were a natural turn of events and not a cruel, opressionistic system of government. These imperialistic nations exploited other nations and cultures and their troops' motivation was the glory of the nation and the eradication of the weaker races on earth. These soldiers believed in Social Darwinism. Also, nations were able to become imperialistic because of the support of their people. They "marketed" imperialism through Social Darwinism. Finally, when these weaker countries were taken over, they were brainwashed to believe that the invasion and oppression of their people were just a result of nature. These oppressed people believed this because, according to Social Darwinism, only the fittest survive. And so, the imperialistic nations would survive and multiply while the oppressed civilizations were invaded and changed.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trying Juveniles as Adults

    • 2749 Words
    • 11 Pages

    First, criminologists who deal with juveniles believe poverty, family factors, the environment, media influence, and declining social morality are the main reasons for juvenile crime. It is considered out-dated to say that poverty causes crime, but nearly 22% of children under the age of eighteen live in poverty. Disorganization, dilapidation, deterioration, and despair are all associated with social isolation and economic stress, which are two main factors of poverty (O'Connor). Police patrol through run-down, poverty-stricken areas more frequent in large cities. To the kids in these areas, this only backs up the idea that the enemy is society. Another indicator of juvenile crime is fatherless children. In the United States we see fathers as the ones who provide economic stability, act as role models, and alleviate the stress of mothers. Without a father, many young men have no one to turn to as a role model. About 50% of marriages in the US end in…

    • 2749 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you believe that the basic concepts of Social Darwinism created a legitimate theory for explaining the social and economic rewards within our American society that certain individuals achieved during the gilded age of our past? Explain ….…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We see many positive examples of social Darwinism today, from small things like a sport that requires…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Social Darwinism is the belief that the individual is more powerful than society. It encourages a ruthless system of self-interest and intolerant treatment of others. Those who believe in Social Darwinism believe that the society is inferior to the needs of the individual. Often those who believe in Social Darwinism are racist and believe that the white origin is the superior race of society. Social Darwinism is the opposite of socialism. Socialists believe that society comes before the individual while those who follow Social Darwinism believe the individual comes before society. However, Social Darwinism has been incorporated into the belief of socialism mainly with the fact that people believe that they can rise about the "natural law" and through planning they can create the perfect society. They believe that they can live their lives in a utopian society. Socialism believes in government intervention to control the means of production. Therefore, the state controls the production within the country and control the direction, which the country goes.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Social Darwinism is the theory developed in England and the United States that includes the ideas of Natural Selection and Survival of the Fittest. It generally states that the strong will survive, gain power, be wealthy and prosper in society while the weak will die off, lose power, be poor and not prosper in society. The stronger you are the generally better your life will be in society. It is not something that you choose, but something that fate has chosen for you. You can be the hardest working person in the world and only achieve half of what someone else has, when it was just handed directly to them. That is how the world works, it is not a pretty place where everyone is happy and taken care of. The world is a battleground where you have to fight for what you want and what you want to achieve. The idea of everything being "fair" in society is a long lost dream. There is no way around it, people will be starving on the streets of Detroit while a movie producer in Los Angeles eats a three course meal and throws half of it in the garbage. There are a couple different views on Social Darwinism and in the paragraphs that follow I will try to help you understand them and then give you my own personal opinion on this idea that has so many people thinking deeply today.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the wild, animals compete against one another for survival, fighting to keep their spot in the world. America, along with every other country goes through tough economic struggle, where the population has to fight in order to survive. Social Darwinism is a term used to describe the idea that humans, like animals and plants, compete in a struggle for existence in which natural selection results in "survival of the fittest." People living in the United States indeed, have to fight for many things in life such as jobs, sports, and ___ thus showing that social Darwinism is something that occurs.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through the course of history primarily in the late 19th century to the early 20th century,…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the discussions having to do with heredity seem to be accusing the person of inheriting an ill-suited trait. This could be because in general people want to appear as though everything good that happens to them is a direct result of something they themselves did. Anything bad that happens is always someone else’s fault.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case study above is part of a wider debate known as the ‘nature vs. nurture’ debate. This discussion has two opposing views, with sociologists on one hand and socio-biologists and biologists on the other. Genetics plays a large part in this…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays