Preview

Socrates Was In Fact Wise About God

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1618 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates Was In Fact Wise About God
Socrates was in fact wise about God in his life and death as a philosopher in the classical Athens time period. To fully show he was wise about God, one must investigate what wisdom and who God is, and use textual evidence, or dialogues of Socrates, to prove his wisdom of God.
In order to show that Socrates was in fact wise about God, one must first define what wisdom itself is. An English word with the stem word, weid, wid meaning “to see” (Mohr, p. 4). It can be defined as a type of knowledge. For someone to posses knowledge one must see a subject and an object. A subject can also be called the knower and an object can be referred to as the thing that the knower, knows. Both the subject and object are connected by means of an idea. An idea
…show more content…
So in order to possess wisdom of something, communication must be fully understood. Communication has the definition of different things that have something in common that allow them to be called by the same name. This strikes a similar definition to that of an idea. Therefore we can say that someone who communicates expresses ideas. The etymology of communication also helps fully express what it means to communicate. From the Indo- European etymology, “ko” meaning “together” and “moin” meaning “exchange”. This etymology infers that a “sharing” of ideas must occur in order to effectively communicate (Mohr, p. 4).
While Socrates can be seen communicating through the act of questioning, he attains his wisdom through a “union” of one’s “consciousness” with that of God and others which fits the definition of Socratic wisdom. Socrates believed that to be wise, one must question everything around them including themselves. Socrates questioned poets, politicians, and craftsmen and discovered that that true wisdom is that questioning with a union of one’s consciousness with that of God (Mohr, p. 39). Because he has this consciousness of God and is able to communicate with God, he must be wise about
…show more content…
The cave in this analogy can be a representation of the material world. The prisoners only knew of what they saw which was a sensible reality in the material world. It was not until the one prisoner left that he realized what reality truly was. The source of this reality is sharing. The sun is a symbol of the ultimate reality. In Socrates’ case, the ultimate reality is called the idea of the good, as seen in the Republic. Both the sun and the idea of the good are all powerful and a source of life. Like the sun gives life to things out of the cave on earth, all knowledge comes from the ultimate reality. Like the sun, without the ultimate reality there can be no existence or awareness. Although the sun can not be the ultimate reality as it is limited and the idea of the good is not. All of the ideas in this story are copies of the idea of the good. Socrates again shows his wisdom of God by showing that his ultimate reality is God or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Book Vii of the Republic

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One day a prisoner escapes. He looks towards the cave’s entrance. Fantasized by the sun’s light, he realizes that the objects he sees in the light are the real versions of the shadows he saw on the walls of the cave.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On pages 35-37 of Plato’s philosophical dialogue “Apology” (389 BCE), Socrates argues that if he is wise it’s because he, unlike others, knows that he is not wise and he knows that people can not know when they think they know. In the beginning of the dialogue socrates sets up the question on why he is in trouble with the court(for corrupting the youth) and where did his reputation come from. He explains to the court that the oracle pronounced him as being the most wise and that no one else was wiser than him. Being confused on why the Gods would say this, Socrates explains the stories to the court on how he ventured out to search for wiser man to prove the oracle wrong but along the way he realizes that the politicians, poets, and artisans…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2) Socrates did not always think that he was wise, many people labeled him as a teacher. Socrates did not really care for this label. He did not really think that he knew much. Socrates had a friend named Chaerephon who went to the oracle the God of Delphi. Cheaerephon asked the oracle is there any one wiser then Socrates, the oracle answered no (21a). Socrates did not understand this and set out to prove the oracle wrong. While out to prove the oracle wrong Socrates realized he is wise but not because he knew everything, but because he realized he knew nothing and didn’t act as if he did.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonard Nelson in a critical essay defines the Socratic method as “the art of teaching not philosophy but philosophizing, the art not of teaching about philosophers but of making philosophers of the students” (Nelson). Socrates way of teaching was not simply telling his students something directly and having them accept an answer without doubt like most straightforward teachers of the time did, but rather to propose a question or series of questions and see what his students had to say about it. Socrates would listen to his student’s arguments and either gun down their answers or show an example, which obviously contradicts and proves their ideas wrong. As an example, in The Republic, Polemarchus is arguing with Socrates that it is the right thing to do harm to those who do evil to you. Socrates rejects his answer by telling a horse analogy which he says that harming a bad horse will only make the horse worse, therefore it is not right to do return evil for evil. With his questions, he helped his listeners realize that they lacked a full understanding of the topic they were discussing. Socrates did not teach his own ideas and beliefs. Through his method, he acted as a type of catalyst for others to search and find the truth for themselves. Socrates peculiar teaching method was radically different than those methods of his time and proves another reason why Socrates was a very intriguing…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato vs Isocrates

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Plato encouraged in his writings that the view that sophists were concerned with was “the manipulative aspects of how humans acquire knowledge.” (Lecture) Sophists believed that only provisional or probable knowledge was available to humans but both Plato and Isocrates did not agree with a lot of what the Sophists had to say. They both believed in wisdom and having a connection with rhetoric but vary in defining wisdom in itself. Wisdom for Socrates and Plato is having an understanding of speech, knowledge of truth and being able to question the speaker in order to seek and reveal truth. Isocrates defined wisdom as having a sense of integrity and character along with the ambition and ability to speak well with others.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While describing the form of good, Socrates is not able to entirely convince the reader what he speaks of and that is when he decides to compare this form to the source which to him is the sun. According to his argument, it is only after a man gets hold of the form of goodness that he finally achieves the highest understanding and cognitive level. To him, all philosophers have attained that level and they are highly cognitive and…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apology by Plato

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    For the majority of his life, Socrates spent a good deal of his time asking questions of the people of Athens. His goal was to arrive at a set of political and ethical truths. Contrary to many people at the time, Socrates did not lecture about the things he knew; he actually claimed to be rather ignorant. He claimed he was wise only because he recognized his ignorance and did not claim to know what he did not know (Grube 26). The questions Socrates asked forced his audiences to think through a problem and arrive at a logical conclusion. At times, the answers seemed so obvious his opponents often looked foolish. His “Socratic Method” of questioning as it came to be called later, was adored by Socrates’ followers but despised by others throughout Athens (“Socrates Biography.”).…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Socrates Not Wise

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He first went with a politician " who had the reputation of wisdom." As they began to converse Socrates noticed he really wasn't all that wise as the people and the politician himself believed. Since the politician believed he was wise but really wasn’t Socrates really knew he wasn’t wise because at least he knew he wasn’t wise. After examining the politician he went to a poets of all sort but they all had the same diagnostic, that they weren't wise.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The charges that were brought against Socrates were corrupting the young and Impiety. Socrates says “If you ask me what kind of wisdom, I reply, wisdom such as may perhaps be attained by man, for to that extent I am inclined to believe that I am wise; Whereas the persons of whom I was speaking have a superhuman wisdom, which I may fail to describe, because I have it not myself; and he who says that I have Speaks falsely and is taking away my character” (Pg 5).…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    socrates

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    that he knows what he does not. On the supposedly wise man he found after the…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates first addressed the old accusations, which he described as prejudices implanted in the minds of the jurors, by many, when the jurors were quite young. Believing that it would be more difficult to remove such prejudices, Socrates first attempted to refute the old preconceived ideas about him (18b-e). In early societies, such as Athens, people made sense of the world and themselves in terms of the gods and by telling stories about the gods. In this case, the gods were viewed as the powers that fashioned and ruled the world. Various Greek philosophers attempted to make sense of the world in terms of various elements and ‘mechanical’ principles. Philosophy, thus, was perceived as arising in opposition to traditional religious beliefs. However, Socrates disproves these accusations by claiming he, in fact, has no interest in how the earth is made, nor does he hold any expertise in this particular topic (19d). Socrates also dismisses the accusation of teaching others these things by asserting he is not a teacher (19e). In Athens, only the wealthy could afford teachers, making teachers very rich during this time period. However, Socrates asks his…

    • 1073 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Voltaire seem to both share the idea that there could be a supreme being in the universe, but they differed on opinion for the relationship between reasoning and religion. Socrates, though not outright denying the existence of the gods, believed that a concept cannot be true if it cannot have definite proof. His belief– infamously known as the Socratic method–was that man’s interpretation of religion could be dangerous to follow blindly due to the numerous contradictions attached. He revealed such contradictions through a cross examination after somebody explained their stance on the argument, but religion was a debate that Socrates could never find an absolute answer for. For instance, when having a discussion with Euthyphro about the meaning of piety, Socrates seems to indirectly mock the absurdity of Euthyphro's blind faith; since he could not give a straightforward answer: “If you had not certainly known the nature of piety and impiety, I am confident that you would never, on behalf of a serf, have charged your aged father with murder.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays