Speeches Essay/
An inherent tension between the actual and the possible is revealed through the development of ideas in a speech. This is seen through an intrinsic connection between reality and what can become reality, made obvious by notions presented through, rhetorical devices. This is seen in the prescribed speeches. .
An intrinsic connection between reality and what can become reality is made obvious by notions presented through rhetorical devices. This is seen in Anwar Sadat's speech "Statement to the Knesset", through a succinct presentation that remains strong without a sense of belligerence, allowing in tern for a sense of unification and a call for peace. He accomplishes this throughout the speech by escalating his tone alongside constant frequent reference to religion, grouping Islam, Christianity and Judaism together in his plea for peace "We all, on this land, the land of God; we all, Muslims, Christians and Jews, worship God and no one but God." which brings a great sense of unity especially through the use of the inclusive "we all" phrase. This is somewhat the reality of the situation, but does not manifest itself enough (in Anwars belief) within the social consciousness - so it ends up being the possible. This is furthered at the conclusion of the speech, through the utilisation of the personal pronoun of "I" and the inclusive "we" repeatedly. This choice of language contributes strongly to the escalating strength of the speech by pulling the audience in as one, achieving a sense of unification. He believes it is possible that complete unity can be achieved, and he is attempting to attains this unity within his speech. So an intrinsic connection between the actual and the possible revealed through the development of ideas in the speech. This is presented and made stronger through the rhetorical devices.
Similarly in Faith Bandler's Speech: "Faith, Hope and reconciliation", an inherent tension between reality and what can become reality is revealed through
An intrinsic connection between reality and what can become reality is made obvious by notions presented through rhetorical devices. This is seen in Anwar Sadat's speech "Statement to the Knesset", through a succinct presentation that remains strong without a sense of belligerence, allowing in tern for a sense of unification and a call for peace. He accomplishes this throughout the speech by escalating his tone alongside constant frequent reference to religion, grouping Islam, Christianity and Judaism together in his plea for peace "We all, on this land, the land of God; we all, Muslims, Christians and Jews, worship God and no one but God." which brings a great sense of unity especially through the use of the inclusive "we all" phrase. This is somewhat the reality of the situation, but does not manifest itself enough (in Anwars belief) within the social consciousness - so it ends up being the possible. This is furthered at the conclusion of the speech, through the utilisation of the personal pronoun of "I" and the inclusive "we" repeatedly. This choice of language contributes strongly to the escalating strength of the speech by pulling the audience in as one, achieving a sense of unification. He believes it is possible that complete unity can be achieved, and he is attempting to attains this unity within his speech. So an intrinsic connection between the actual and the possible revealed through the development of ideas in the speech. This is presented and made stronger through the rhetorical devices.
Similarly in Faith Bandler's Speech: "Faith, Hope and reconciliation", an inherent tension between reality and what can become reality is revealed through