Introduction: Academic tests can’t provide valueable measurements of students’ and schools’ comprehensive abilities.
Outline
I. Temperory Skills vs. Life Skills
A. Most of the skills are temperory skills, a lot of people don’t need these skills for lifelong.
B. Some teachers hold the idea “ teach to the test”, just care about students’ grades rather than teaching them some learning skills. C. Some of the students even don’t know some basic life skills.
II. A bad Judgement of students ability A. Some Students tend to cheat in order to get good grades, which adapt bad behaviors B. Different students have different dreams; teachers and parents should aim on students’ interests. C. Some students have talents in different fields, parents should teach them on their talent fields.
III. The standarlized tests creates pressure A. Pressure on students 1) From parents 2) From the competition between students B. Take away a lot of time from the school academic work which is a better represention of a students ability.
IV. An unfair measurements of the school’s educational abilities. A. Different wealth power B. Different degrees of emphasize of the standarlized tests
Conclusion: The standarlized test is not a suitable measurement for both students and schools since it lacks fairness and comprehensiveness.
Resolve: A national standardized test is a good measurement of high school student ability and school quality.
Introduction: Academic tests can’t provide valueable measurements of students’ and schools’ comprehensive abilities.
Outline
I. Temperory Skills vs. Life Skills
A. Most of the skills are temperory skills, a lot of people don’t need these skills for lifelong.
B. Some teachers hold the idea “ teach to the test”, just care about students’ grades rather than teaching them some learning skills.