With only three or four subjects being pushed through the tests many other subject areas are being “put on the back burner”. According to late education researcher Gerald W. Bracey, PhD, qualities that standardized tests cannot measure include “creativity, critical thinking, resilience, perseverance, self-discipline, leadership, honesty, and integrity” just to name a few(www.washingtonpost.com). A national 2007 study by the Center on Education Policy reported that since 2001, 44% of school districts had reduced the time spent on science, social studies, and art by an average of 145 minutes per week in order to focus on reading and math(www.nea.org). With all these cuts backs to time spent in other classes not deemed important it seems to be leaving a more desirable group of students, skill set, or interest in a particular subject . Like those that are good at math, science, and english are more valuable than those who are into the music and art programs. These are the students who are getting swept under the …show more content…
That without them you would not have measurable data to assess comprehension and or lack of knowledge in a subject. Many argue that standardized tests don’t narrow the curriculum, but they highlight the important basic skills which students should master. A 2013 Associated Press Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that 75% of parents say standardized tests “are a solid measure of their children’s abilities”, and 69% say the tests “are a good measure of the school's’ quality”(www.apnorc.org). In the 2009 edition of the PISA test China displaced Finland as number one in reading, math, and science(www.nytimes.com). With calls to reduce standardized tests China seems to prove that they are a good thing in boosting learning and education. Chester E. Finn, Chairman of the Hoover Institution’s Koret Task Force on K-12 Education, predicts that Chinese cities will top the PISA charts for the next several