Preview

Stanley Milgram's Justification Of Aggression

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1745 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanley Milgram's Justification Of Aggression
justifications have been identified by Bandura and Kelman that are used to reduce the psychological discomfort an individual may feel about aggressive actions. These four kinds of aggression justification involve manipulating one’s perception of the aggressive action, motivation, harm, or victim to provide comfort for individuals’ aggressive behavior. The aggressors’ justifications for aggression serve as a “distancing” function making it easier for the aggressor to engage in harmful actions. The first justification provided is finding ways to excuse the aggression. By sanctioning it or calling on moral principles the aggressor feels his actions are excused. The aggressor can also compare their action to something much worse, or using a label …show more content…
The Milgram study was based off Stanley Milgram’s curiosity about the issues of obedience. Milgram wanted to investigate the question is Germans were particularly susceptible to showing obedience to authority figures since that was the excuse for so many Nazi’s during World War 2. The experiment used one subject, “the learner” as an actor to see how far the other participant, “the teacher”, would obey to authority. The task included “the teacher” asking “the learner”, who was strapped to an electric chair, a series of questions. If “the leaner” answered any of these questions wrong, Milgram would order “the teacher” to administer electric shocks to the participant hooked up to the electric shock generator. While progressing into the experiment, “the teacher”, who was aware of Milgram’s study, would act more and more in pain after each shock distributed by “the teacher” acting on Milgram’s authority. While at times the participant showed discomfort and sometimes objections to administering high shock volts to “the teacher”, “the teacher’s” belief that their participation was essential to the experiment resulted in the 65% of the participants continuing to administer shocks to the highest volt level, even when “the teacher” saw that “the learner” was “in pain”. Milgram concluded that average people were likely to obey authority figure, even in the Nazi’s cases. Milgram decided that situational factors could impact and foster obedience. One factor was the legitimacy of the environment. During the exhumation of the Jewish corpses in Schindler’s List, Jewish people obeyed doing the horrendous task of digging up people’s bodies and throwing them into the fire like an object. This was due to the fact that the environment of mass corpses and Nazi intimidation cause the Jews to obey their orders. Proximity of the victim is also a situational factor that heightens obedience. When Schindler’s Jewish women arrive at Auschwitz in the film, they are instructed that they are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Milgram experiment demonstrated that people have been socially conditioned to follow instructions by an authoritarian figure. The participants in the Milgram experiment are pressured and almost verbally forced into continuing to deliver shocks to other participants for giving false answers. They had falsely been told the experiment was to determine the influence of punishment on memory. The results showed that 65% of the participants delivering the shocks delivered a fatal amount of voltage even knowing the destruction of it. It is hard for people to disobey because they have been socially conditioned to follow orders.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree with doing something horrific to another person, since it is easier to conform, than to fight, people tend to protect themselves before protecting a stranger. Stanley Milgram put a study together to prove that Germans are more likely to be obedient to authority then American are. The study was called “If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You? Probably.” Milgram explains the character aspects of why people listen to authority and why they afraid not to. Social structure and the organization of society have a powerful affect on people. Milgrams set out to New Haven to start the study ad later on planed to go to Germany to do the study on the society there.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the experiment, the subject is told by the experimenter to give shocks from a scale of low to dangerously high to the person in the electric chair (who was an actor) when they give a wrong answer. The shocks were not real, but prior to the experiment, the subjects were given a small shock to influence them that the shocks in the experiment were true. After the experiment, Milgram assesses that “between the command and the outcome, there is a paramount force, which is the subject’s capacity for choosing their own behaviour” (p. 851). Although there were people who acted in immoral ways and increased the shock levels, there were also those who chose to renounce the unjust commands of authority, “providing affirmation of human morals and ideals” (p. 851). Therefore, people do have a choice in refusing to abide by authority’s rules and demands, but they choose not to because they do not want to suffer the…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milgram did a lab experiment, varying different situational pressures to see which had the greatest effect on obedience. He told 40 male volunteers that it was a study of how punishment affects learning. After drawing lots, the real participant was assigned the role of 'teacher'. The learner was a confederate. The teachers job was to administrate a learning task and deliver 'electric shocks' to the learner (in another room) if he got a question wrong. The shocks began at 15 volts and increased in increment of 15 volts to a maximum of 450 volts.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    milgrams obedience study

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects' [participants'] strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects' [participants'] ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not. The…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clearly shown when the difference in people's malicious behavior when shocking the students in the presence of authority and when given the freedom to choose the level of shock. The thesis of Milgram's essay was that obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency; indeed, a potent impulse overriding reining ethics, sympathy and moral conduct is right on the dot. He also discusses the extreme willingness of man to obey authority at any length. This shows that "ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process." This is proven by the fact that the majority of people were willing to shock students almost to the assumed point of death when instructed to do so by a…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first Milgram believed that the idea of obedience under Hitler during the Third Reich was appalling. He was not satisfied believing that all humans were like this. Instead, he sought to prove that the obedience was in the German gene pool, not the human one. To test this, Milgram staged an artificial laboratory "dungeon" in which ordinary citizens, whom he hired at $4.50 for the experiment, would come down and be required to deliver an electric shock of increasing intensity to another individual for failing to answer a preset list of questions. Meyer describes the object of the experiment "is to find the shock level at which you disobey the experimenter and refuse to pull the switch" (Meyer 241). Here, the author is paving the way into your mind by introducing the idea of reluctance…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram is one of the leading researchers into the psychology of obedience. Rice et al (2008) and was interested why thousands of German soldiers blindly obeyed orders that resulted in the death of millions of Jewish people during World War II. However if a soldier is obeying orders from their superiors, then should responsibility for the consequences be held to those superiors? But evidence suggests that there was a mass willingness of tens of thousands of people to cooperate with the Nazi regime, even to the extent of shopping neighbours to the Gestapo. Rice et al (2008). The Allies saw the Germans as an authoritarian, militaristic and obedient nation. Suggesting an explanation for this extreme behaviour. Adorno et al (1950) claimed that it was the authoritarian personality that was responsible for the persecution of the Jews in Nazi Germany. Milgram was sceptical of this, believing that obedience was owed more to the situation than to the national character of a particular nation. So in the early 1960s Milgram conducted a series of experiments to support his theory.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yale University psychologist, Stanley Milgram, conducted an experiment in 1961 focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiors. Milgram's experiment, which he told his participants was about learning, was to have participants (teacher) question another participant (learner), and when the learner got a question wrong the teacher would shock the learner. For every question wrong, the teacher would increase the amount of volts used in the shock. Of course the experiment was actually about obedience, the learner was an experimenter, and the shock was faked (McLeod). Milgram's was one of the first psychology experiments to use…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s infamous 1963 study into the nature of obedience is often portrayed in the media as strong evidence for an innate human predisposition to obedience, “resistance is futile” (Parker, 2007) when it comes to the human condition to obey – even in a “destructive” (Milgram, 1963) sense. As Milgram (1963) himself states, obedience as a concept is one of the most fundamental aspects of society, and much has frequently been made of drawing parallels with the atrocities carried out by the Third Reich and the data produced by Milgram’s obedience studies [most notably the dramatic results of the baseline study (Haslam, 2012)]. The ideation is frequently asserted that Nazis themselves were displaying blind obedience (Debattista, 2012) to their superiors, and this blind obedience is what is captured in Milgram’s 1963 experiment, although this proposition must be questioned in lieu of a scientific analysis of Milgram’s actual works,…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram was a psychologist at the University of Yale. Milgram decided to conduct an experiment that would focus on the conflict between authority and a person's personal conscience. Milgram did this study to find the meaning and a new understanding of the acts of the people that occurred during World War II. Milgram wanted to figure out if the Germans were particularly obedient toward authoritative figures. He was eager to find out just how far people would be willing to go in order to obey a certain order even if the act meant hurting another person in the process.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was created to show how well people react when obeying the orders of authority. The subjects who ask the questions were the teachers, and the test subjects who had to answer were the learners. If the learner answers the question incorrectly, the teacher will punish them by giving them a shock that was harmful, but not life-threatening. During the experiment, the intensity of the shock increased, which made the learner yell and scream…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The GAM discusses how a chain of events can lead to blatant aggression through the input of situational and person factors (Branscombe & Baron, 2017). The GAM functions as a cycle with input variables and a person’s own internal state which then leads to either a thought out action or an aggressive act. The internal states that influence the decisions of aggressive acts include arousal, which increases physiological arousal, affective, which generates hostile feelings, and cognitions, which cause individuals to think aggressive thoughts (2017). The GAM has been important in integrating the numerous theories of aggression that exist into one straightforward framework.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s study had been introduced by Stanley Milgram in 1963, who was a psychologist who wanted to understand why Nazi soldiers followed orders. Milgram argued that the soldiers were following orders through successive obedience and decided that it was the social situation of the time, that caused these normal soldiers to kill innocent people(Yogi,2015). Milgram had used 40 male participants during his experiment who he paid $4 an hour for their time, who he told that the experiment would be about a “learning and memory” game (Yogi,2015). Milgram’s experiment was extremely assessed, mainly from an ethics point of view. The study was a catalyst in which experiments were ruled by.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Milgram Study was carried out by Stanley Milgram. Stanley Milgram was working at Yale University as a psychologist. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Milgram selected participants for his experiments by advertising his experiment through the newspaper to participate in his study. He chosen men that ranged from the ages of 25 to 50 and chosen 40 men to participate who were unskilled workers. The objective for his experiment is that Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing unethical behaviors towards…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays