Starbucks Open Carry Weapon Laws

Summarize the opposing viewpoints regarding Starbucks' policy on firearms in its stores, providing the rationale for both. Then, explain which line of reasoning you consider stronger, and why
People are being upset because Starbucks is letting people with license walk around with guns. I “Forty-three states have instituted "open-carry" weapon laws. These laws permit gun owners to carry a firearm in plain sight when in public” THis means that the people are allowed to carry their guns. Guns don't kill people, people kill people with guns. Without the force of pulling the trigger it is basically not dangerous. It as dangerous as a rock, but in the hands of a human it can be very dangerous. Starbucks, allows customers to carry guns in all states
where it's legal. In some of these states, businesses reserve the right to declare their stores gun-free zones. (Just as stores have the right to deny service to barefoot . "[Starbucks is] putting their workers in harm's way by allowing people to carry guns into their stores, especially open carry," said Brian Mantel of the Brady Campaign Customers.) Mantel is against the whole gun thing, but doesn't realize guns are not the problem with today.