Preview

Statements of Material Fact

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6399 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Statements of Material Fact
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

ROY FERRAND, LUTHER SCOTT, JR., CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-cv-00926 and LOUISIANA STATE CONFERENCE LMA – JCW
OF THE NAACP, for themselves and all other persons similarly situated

v.

TOM SCHEDLER, in his official capacity as the Louisiana Secretary of State, RUTH
JOHNSON, in her official capacity as
Secretary of the Louisiana Department of
Children & Family Services, and BRUCE
D. GREENSTEIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals

DEFENDANT JOHNSON’S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS WHICH PRESENT GENUINE ISSUES IN
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant, Ruth Johnson, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Children and Family Services, hereinafter referred to as “Secretary Johnson” or “Defendant Johnson”, pursuant to Local Rule 56.2, submits this statement of genuine issues in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (R. Doc. 112 and 112-1). Items 1 through 101 below correspond to the alleged facts presented in Plaintiffs’ Statement of Uncontested Material Facts (R. Doc. 112-1). Defendant Johnson asserts that there exist genuine issues of material fact in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
1. Defendant Johnson agrees that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA”) is codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg, et seq.; however, the codification of the NVRA is not at issue and it is a statement of law, not material fact.

2. Defendant Johnson agrees that in enacting the NVRA, Congress found the following; but the same is not a statement of material fact and Plaintiffs are simply citing a statement of law:

(1) the right of citizens of the United States to vote is a fundamental right;

(2) it is the duty of the Federal, State, and local governments to promote the exercise of that right; and

(3)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: (One or two sentences about what the case is trying to answer – should be in the form of a question). Were the actions of Mrs. Mitchell constituted misconduct under § 59-90-5(b), N.M.S.A.1953?…

    • 340 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff sued the defendants, claiming that she was sexually assaulted and beaten by hospital employees while she was hospitalized. The defendants were granted a dismissal of the case for non pros. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff failed to meet her requirement to file a certificate of merit within 60 days. As a result, the Court of Common Pleas,…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court decided that plaintiff's complaint states a cognizable cause of action against the defendants for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Accordingly, the defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint is denied.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fifth Circuit Case Summary

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A deeper focus and analysis on the Fifth Circuit’s jurisprudence in this area was required. The analysis focused on the past history of how the Fifth Circuit approached sufficiency arguments, and how its approach had shifted to the present (with Rubio’s case as the newest example). See footnote 3 and 4, and the enormous research required (footnote 4 as roughly 36 or more cases firming up a consistent pattern of Jackson’s application in sufficiency cases). By extension, additional time was necessary to detail how and why the Fifth Circuit had shifted in its application of Jackson over time.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 4 Pros And Cons

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We affirm resolved: “The supreme court rightly decided that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.”…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author did not make any vague, ambiguous or unsupported statements in the note. Connolly supported all of her facts with evidence and laws. In the introduction she laid out exactly what was going to be discussed in the three parts of the article so that there would be no confusion and then went on to thoroughly explain each part with support from other journals she found. Each state has the ability to interpret the Tenth Amendment and private party standing the way they want. “Relying on the third-party standing bar, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has ruled that the…

    • 1561 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Flu Vaccine Case Study

    • 3011 Words
    • 13 Pages

    3. What are the social values the Federal government should protect? State government should protect?…

    • 3011 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    the United States Constitution, certain duties were imposed upon the several states, and the exercise of certain…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011) Retrieved from sblog.s3.amaxonaws.com Academic database < http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/11-9307-Henderson-v.-U.S.-Petition.pdf>…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Grandparent Visitation

    • 3454 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Based on the limited facts, the Johnson Superior Court should, at the least, modify the Agreed Entry between the parties that, among other things, granted Catherine McHugh (hereinafter the “grandmother”) visitation of the minor child Christopher A. Cronin (hereinafter the “child”). There is an issue as to whether the grandmother is entitled to visitation rights to the minor child and whether the bad relationship between the Alice Cronin (hereinafter the “mother”) and grandmother is a consideration in determining the child’s best interest.…

    • 3454 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the…

    • 2765 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas V. Johnson

    • 7943 Words
    • 32 Pages

    The demonstration ended in front of Dallas City Hall, where Johnson unfurled the American flag, doused it with kerosene, and set it on fire. While the flag burned, the protestors chanted, "America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you." After the demonstrators dispersed, a witness to the flag burning collected the flag's remains and buried them in his backyard. No one was physically injured or threatened with injury, though several witnesses testified that they had been seriously offended by the flag burning. [p400]…

    • 7943 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriage speech

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A. As American citizens we are promised rights our unalienable rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness as it states in the Declaration of Independence.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Malayan Law Journal Reports/1953/Volume 1/BERENGER v ROZARIO (MW) - [1953] 1 MLJ 239 - 1 July 1953…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The general rule is that ‘where there is a right there is a remedy’ ubi jus ibi remedium; which provides the fundamental concept that the complainant who has a grievance cognizable by the law may be assured of a remedy through the courts. Ubi jus ibi remedium has been a fundamental concept of our legal system, and the complainant who has a grievance cognizable by the law may be assured of a remedy through the courts.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays