Preview

States Ought Not Possess Nuclear Weapons Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
612 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
States Ought Not Possess Nuclear Weapons Essay
Affirmative Case
Resolved: States ought not possess nuclear weapons.
The affirmative value for this case will be Human Life. Human life is defined as a personal life, the course of an individual's life, especially when viewed as the sum of personal choices contributing to one's personal identity. Being secure is ones right to live in the fundamental need of humankind. Life is a value, and without it, we cannot fully engage in the pursuit of other, secondary societal values, such as justice, equality, or liberty. Nuclear weapons threaten human life and countries around the world shall not possess it. This leads to my criterion, which is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is defined as the doctrine that actions are right if they are useful or for the benefit of a majority. Utilitarianism states that in moral decision, we shall do whatever action will produce the greatest number of people. A future where life is constantly threatened by a nuclear weapon attack or accident is the best option for humankind. Only when countries agree to get rid of nuclear weapons, it is when the world will be in peace.
I have three contentions to support an affirmation of the resolution:
Contention 1 : Proliferation of nuclear weapons increases the chances of nuclear accidents.
Contention 2: Terrorists will steal nuclear weapons from …show more content…
There are numerous documented cases of safety mechanisms failing on nuclear weapons, very nearly causing nuclear launches. New proliferating states often have crude security measures and are not as advanced as established nuclear powers, increasing the chance of an accident. Moreover, some nuclear programs are also secretive, decreasing the transparency and ability for groups to scrutinize and criticize the process. Instead of risking a potentially catastrophic accident, nuclear weapons should simply be
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06
    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U.S World History 05.06

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Scare
    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scare

    In addition to the reduction in weapons, the number of countries which were developing, had developed or were seriously discussing nuclear programs has dropped since the 1980’s. This was due to a combination of factors that still determine such decisions today, including security, expense, need for status or prestige, internal politics and other factors.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Proliferation Argumentative Analysis
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nuclear Proliferation Argumentative Analysis

    I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Bomb Argumentative Essay
    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nuclear Bomb Argumentative Essay

    6 august, 1945 America had attacked Hiroshima, Japan with nuclear bomb named little boy. Nuclear bomb has taken around 10000 lives in the provenience of explosion. Three days later again an attack had occurred with the same type of the bomb named fat man in Nagasaki. The intensity of the bomb was 12500 TNT and it had caused around 4000 degree Celsius. It was enough to vaporize the flesh and bones of humans. It was a nightmare for the people of Japan.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons
    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

    A nuclear weapon is a weapon that gets it’s destructive power by turning matter into energy. All nuclear weapons are explosives(usually missiles).They can be transported by missiles, bombs,tank shells,mines, or torpedoes. The most destructive nuclear weapons are far more poweful than any conventional(non nuclear) weapon. A nuclear weapon used in a large city could kill millions of people. A large nuclear war could devastate the Earth’s climate and ability to support life(a.k.a nuclear winter).…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing
    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

    Many people wonder about the future of the world as more powerful nuclear weapons are developed. The U.S. should learn from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and discontinue the development and production of nuclear weapons because the bombs will create unforeseen damage, prompt other countries to produce…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bombs
    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Bombs

    The nuclear bomb is dangerous and scary weapon that really should have never been thought of or invented. Nuclear bombs have been the focal point of every country's scientists ever since World War II when the U.S. dropped them on Japan. Just seeing the death and destruction a nuclear bomb can cause to people and the environment just proves my point. Not one person should have the power to just be able to push a button and have the ability to tear another country to shreds.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Mass Destruction Of Nuclear Weapons
    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Mass Destruction Of Nuclear Weapons

    Every time I hear a word "War" as a child, I still have to hear a word "Nuclear Weapons". From that time, I didn't know what they are. But when I grow up, I learned that Nuclear Weapons are the device that can destroy many people or one small country. So I believe that They are the killing device. From these reasons…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Gun Control In The United States
    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Gun Control In The United States

    I believe that the biggest problem with nuclear weapons and the public is the fear factor also. As we look back at the different wars fought there was only two nuclear bombs that were dropped. If you listen to conversations today you would believe that they had been used in every major war. According to Mauroni "there has been no public confirmation that a terrorist group has ever obtained, is about to get, or currently has a nuclear weapon, anxieties over that end-state have been converted into conclusions"(2012, p 10). I can understand wanting to have the same power as another country but I think that is where things get tricky. Look at the fact of gun control in America today. I have plenty of guns and I have always had access to them…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    nuclear weapons advocate peace
    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages

    nuclear weapons advocate peace

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Weapons Persuasive Essay
    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Atomic Weapons Persuasive Essay

    The US propelled atomic weapons in the mornings of August sixth and August ninth of 1945 to Japan, producing a huge number of honest deads, without tallying the back ones caused by the radiation that was in the place. Atomic weapons are probably the most huge executing gadgets weapons that have ever existed. This weapon can burn people that are in the epicenter of the bomb and the spots encompassing it in not more than seconds. This weapon ought to be dispensed with from earth since it is a peril to the planet and people, a reality that is much more terrible than creating a few many years of "worldwide peace". Likewise, it is an unfeeling approach to murder a person, that is against to any sort of good esteem.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay.
    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay.

    Whilst the atomic bomb is considered as one of the greatest inventions of all time, in terms of how it could protect a nation, is it really worth having numerous amounts of governments on edge at the thought of a weapon so powerful? Ronald Reagan described nuclear weapons as:…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Nuclear Deterrence
    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page

    Arguments Against Nuclear Deterrence

    On the other hand, one could produce an equally valid argument against the use of nuclear deterrence. While nuclear deterrence helps with reducing the chance of nuclear war, it is by no means a guaranteed barrier. It is easily seen that nuclear weapons hold the potential for the loss of innocent life; around 150,000 were lost in the U.S. attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In addition to the loss of life, the loss of large sums of government money is a second argument against nuclear deterrence. It is estimated that between 1940 and 2000, $5.5 trillion were spent on nuclear weapons programs, and nearly $350 billion is estimated to be spent in the next ten years. It can easily be argued this money would be better spent on government projects…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Should The United States Use Nuclear Weapons?
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Should The United States Use Nuclear Weapons?

    Nuclear weapons were introduced to the Asian continent in 1945, by the United States. The United States succeeded in nuclear weapon development all thanks to the Manhattan Project team. Thus the United States developing its nuclear weaponry, the fears of the Soviet Union amplified and many other powers joined the nuclear arms race.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear Weapons In The Cold War Essay
    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Nuclear Weapons In The Cold War Essay

    Nuclear weapons in the Cold War changed how wars were fought because it was the beginning of an era where wars were no longer fought in the conventional sense. The creation of nuclear weapons meant that people lived in a constant state of fear of nuclear war. In order to ensure national security and protection states, primarily the United States and Russia the leading superpowers in the Cold War, needed to have a strong deterrence policy to prevent the other state from launching a nuclear attack. In theory deterrence is an effective approach as it prevents nuclear war and states are successfully able to protect themselves and are therefore not viewed as vulnerable. The film “Dr. Strangelove, or how I learned to stop worrying and love the…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics