Steroids Should Be Banned Research Paper

The issue of whether people, sport organisations such as the IOC (International Olympic Committee), should ban drug cheats for life has been extensively discussed and debated.
This argument is important because of the fundamental and social issues that come with banning athletes affect their lives. Several different arguments have been put forward to support and disapprove this topic. This essay will look at arguments that support the banning of drug cheats for life from many different types of sports and competitions that are played all around the world.

Athletes that use drugs to enhance their performance and increase their chance of winning are playing unfairly. If athletes use drugs to win, other competitors are robbed of their chances of a fair game and prize. Expand Explanation For instance, a woman by the name of Wu Yanyan, a former 200m individual medley world record holder, was found guilty of taking anabolic steroids and later banned for four years from competing. Because of the reason Yanyan won, it was unfair to the other competitors who just wanted a fair chance of winning.

Drug use can be harmful for athlete’s health if they are not needed for specific medical reasons. There have been many cases of drug
use in sports that lead to mental as well as physical harm. When using certain types of drugs they can take affect on your body and organs just as much as your mental thoughts. For example, a former West Coast star Chris Mainwaring died of a violent heart attack, in his backyard, on a Sunday night after yelling for help an hour or so before.The sudden death of the 41-year-old premiership player had a mystery around it that everyone kept questioning. It has been recorded that Mainwaring told the paramedics he had taken cannabis and ecstasy some time before. “Illicit drugs were probably involved in his death.” Mainwaring’s father told the ABC radio. Taking this example of drugs that took effect on an athlete's body, people can see what kind of horrible damage could happen.

It is argued that it is unfair to ban an athlete for life after they have only made one “mistake”.This argument is not without credit, however, if you don't execute serious punishment for drug cheats then how will we know that competitors and athletes won't make “mistakes” again?
To illustrate, there was a slight altercation at the Seoul Olympics in 1988. Ben Johnson, a Canadian athlete, ran 100m in 9.79 seconds and became the fastest human in history. Until three days later he was ripped of his title as he was positive for steroids. Then in 1993, he was tested positive another time and was banned for life by the International Amateur Athletics Federation. No one can really trust athletes to not repeat the “mistake” again so why take second
chances?

In conclusion, if people put a ban on drug cheats from participating in sports and competitions then it will make the competitions fair, which would also drastically decrease the amount of altercations with drugs and steroids. If people continue letting drug cheats slip through their hands and HE make more mistakes in the future there no end to its disastrous extent.