This argument is important because of the fundamental and social issues that come with banning athletes affect their lives. Several different arguments have been put forward to support and disapprove this topic. This essay will look at arguments that support the banning of drug cheats for life from many different types of sports and competitions that are played all around the world.
Athletes that use drugs to enhance their performance and increase their chance of winning are playing unfairly. If athletes use drugs to win, other competitors are robbed of their chances of a fair game and prize. Expand Explanation For instance, a woman by the name of Wu Yanyan, a former 200m individual medley world record holder, was found guilty of taking anabolic steroids and later banned for four years from competing. Because of the reason Yanyan won, it was unfair to the other competitors who just wanted a fair chance of winning.
Drug use can be harmful for athlete’s health if they are not needed for specific medical reasons. There have been many cases of drug …show more content…
To illustrate, there was a slight altercation at the Seoul Olympics in 1988. Ben Johnson, a Canadian athlete, ran 100m in 9.79 seconds and became the fastest human in history. Until three days later he was ripped of his title as he was positive for steroids. Then in 1993, he was tested positive another time and was banned for life by the International Amateur Athletics Federation. No one can really trust athletes to not repeat the “mistake” again so why take second